Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[y sweet] support optional initialClientToken for YSweetProvider #319

Conversation

rolyatmax
Copy link
Member

This updates the YSweetProvider (and the React <YDocProvider>) to take an optional initialClientToken. This can be used to cut out one server roundtrip if the client token is obtained at render time.

@rolyatmax rolyatmax requested a review from paulgb October 15, 2024 18:34
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 15, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
y-sweet-debugger ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 15, 2024 6:35pm
y-sweet-demos ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 15, 2024 6:35pm
y-sweet-gendocs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 15, 2024 6:35pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 15, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant updates to the provider.ts and main.tsx files within the js-pkg directory. In provider.ts, the YSweetProviderParams type is enhanced with a new optional property, initialClientToken, which allows for specifying an initial client token during the creation of a YSweetProvider. Additionally, the ySweetProviderWrapper function's parameter name is changed from providerParams to wrapperParams, and the logic for obtaining the client token is updated to prioritize the initialClientToken if provided.

In main.tsx, the YDocProviderProps type is updated to import and utilize the ClientToken type, clarifying the docId and authEndpoint properties. An optional initialClientToken property is also added, enabling its specification in the YDocProvider. The createYjsProvider function is modified to include the initialClientToken in its parameters, and minor documentation updates are made for clarity.

Possibly related PRs

  • [y sweet/client] support provider.on() #301: The changes in this PR involve modifying the event handling for the provider object, which is relevant to the updates made in the ySweetProviderWrapper function in the main PR, as both involve handling events related to the provider.

Suggested reviewers

  • paulgb: Suggested as a reviewer for expertise related to the changes in provider functionality.

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
js-pkg/client/src/provider.ts (2)

530-533: LGTM: Updated ySweetProviderWrapper function signature

The changes to the function signature and parameter handling are well-implemented:

  1. Renaming providerParams to wrapperParams more accurately represents the function's purpose.
  2. Destructuring initialClientToken allows for its separate handling.

Consider renaming the providerParams variable on line 533 to something like remainingParams or otherParams to better reflect its content after destructuring initialClientToken.


544-544: LGTM: Implemented initialClientToken handling

The implementation of initialClientToken handling is well done:

  • It uses the nullish coalescing operator (??) to elegantly handle the case when initialClientToken is not provided.
  • The logic maintains the existing functionality of fetching a new token when necessary.

This change successfully implements the PR objective of allowing the use of an initial client token when available.

For improved readability, consider extracting the token retrieval logic into a separate function:

function getInitialToken(initialToken: ClientToken | undefined, authEndpoint: AuthEndpoint, roomname: string): Promise<ClientToken> {
  return initialToken ?? getClientToken(authEndpoint, roomname);
}

// Usage
let _clientToken = await getInitialToken(initialClientToken, authEndpoint, roomname);

This extraction would make the main function body cleaner and the token retrieval logic more reusable.

js-pkg/react/src/main.tsx (1)

Line range hint 194-205: Include authEndpoint and initialClientToken in the dependency array of the useEffect.

The useEffect hook depends on authEndpoint and initialClientToken, but they are not included in the dependency array. Omitting these dependencies can lead to issues when either authEndpoint or initialClientToken changes, as the effect won't re-run to reflect the updated values.

Apply this diff to include all necessary dependencies:

 useEffect(() => {
   let canceled = false
   let provider: YSweetProviderWithClientToken | null = null
   const doc = new Y.Doc()

   ;(async () => {
     provider = await createYjsProvider(doc, docId, authEndpoint, {
       initialClientToken,
       // TODO: this disables local cross-tab communication, which makes
       // debugging easier, but should be re-enabled eventually
       disableBc: true,
     })

     if (canceled) {
       provider.destroy()
       return
     }

     setCtx({ doc, provider })
   })()

   return () => {
     canceled = true
     provider?.destroy()
     doc.destroy()
   }
- }, [docId])
+ }, [docId, authEndpoint, initialClientToken])
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 17779f7 and 9d2ed3f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • js-pkg/client/src/provider.ts (3 hunks)
  • js-pkg/react/src/main.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: rolyatmax
PR: jamsocket/y-sweet#294
File: js-pkg/react/src/main.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-09-30T18:35:52.941Z
Learning: The `getProvider` logic is the main difference between `YDocProvider` and `YDocProviderFromClientToken` components, so refactoring to eliminate duplication may not be appropriate.
Learnt from: rolyatmax
PR: jamsocket/y-sweet#294
File: js-pkg/react/src/main.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:32:21.105Z
Learning: The `getProvider` logic is the main difference between `YDocProvider` and `YDocProviderFromClientToken` components, so refactoring to eliminate duplication may not be appropriate.
js-pkg/react/src/main.tsx (2)
Learnt from: rolyatmax
PR: jamsocket/y-sweet#294
File: js-pkg/react/src/main.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:32:21.105Z
Learning: The `getProvider` logic is the main difference between `YDocProvider` and `YDocProviderFromClientToken` components, so refactoring to eliminate duplication may not be appropriate.
Learnt from: rolyatmax
PR: jamsocket/y-sweet#294
File: js-pkg/react/src/main.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-09-30T18:35:52.941Z
Learning: The `getProvider` logic is the main difference between `YDocProvider` and `YDocProviderFromClientToken` components, so refactoring to eliminate duplication may not be appropriate.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
js-pkg/client/src/provider.ts (2)

227-227: LGTM: Addition of initialClientToken to YSweetProviderParams

The addition of the optional initialClientToken property to YSweetProviderParams aligns well with the PR objective of allowing developers to provide a client token at render time. This change enhances the flexibility of the YSweetProvider while maintaining backwards compatibility.


Line range hint 227-544: Summary: Successfully implemented optional initialClientToken support

The changes in this file successfully implement the PR objective of supporting an optional initial client token for the YSweetProvider. The implementation is well-thought-out, maintaining backwards compatibility and integrating smoothly with the existing codebase.

Key points:

  1. Added initialClientToken to YSweetProviderParams.
  2. Updated ySweetProviderWrapper to handle the new initialClientToken.
  3. Implemented logic to use initialClientToken when available or fetch a new token otherwise.

The code is clean, and the changes are minimal yet effective. The minor suggestions provided in the review comments could further enhance readability and maintainability.

js-pkg/react/src/main.tsx (1)

175-183: Documentation clarity for YDocProviderProps.

The updated documentation for docId, authEndpoint, and initialClientToken enhances clarity. The descriptions accurately reflect the purpose and usage of each property.

Comment on lines +181 to +183
/** An optional initial client token to use for the Y.Doc. This will be used initially, and if
* the client token expires, the `authEndpoint` will be called to get a new client token. */
initialClientToken?: ClientToken
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Oct 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Evaluate merging YDocProviderFromClientToken into YDocProvider.

With the addition of the initialClientToken property to YDocProvider, it appears that the functionality overlaps significantly with YDocProviderFromClientToken. This presents an opportunity to reduce code duplication by consolidating these components.

Based on previous learnings, refactoring was deemed inappropriate due to differences in the getProvider logic. However, now that YDocProvider can accept an initialClientToken, please reassess whether combining the components is feasible and beneficial.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

YDocProviderFromClientToken doesn't exist

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rolyatmax, thank you for pointing out that YDocProviderFromClientToken doesn't exist. My apologies for the oversight. It seems that the previous learnings about YDocProviderFromClientToken may no longer be relevant. Would you like me to remove these learnings from the knowledge base?

(^_^;)


🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: rolyatmax
PR: jamsocket/y-sweet#294
File: js-pkg/react/src/main.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-09-30T18:35:52.941Z
Learning: The `getProvider` logic is the main difference between `YDocProvider` and `YDocProviderFromClientToken` components, so refactoring to eliminate duplication may not be appropriate.

Learnt from: rolyatmax
PR: jamsocket/y-sweet#294
File: js-pkg/react/src/main.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:32:21.105Z
Learning: The `getProvider` logic is the main difference between `YDocProvider` and `YDocProviderFromClientToken` components, so refactoring to eliminate duplication may not be appropriate.

@rolyatmax rolyatmax merged commit d098663 into main Oct 15, 2024
8 checks passed
@rolyatmax rolyatmax deleted the taylor/dis-2789-y-sweet-support-optional-initialclienttoken-for-the branch October 15, 2024 18:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants