Toplevel_expect_test is a modified OCaml toplevel that captures its output and compares it against an expected one. The primary goal is to test various kind of errors:
- pre-processing errors,
- typing errors,
- compilation errors,
- runtime errors
Since the toplevel is able to print most things out of the box, this gives an easy way to test the result of an evaluation as well.
Simply write a .ml file containing the same phrases you would write in
a toplevel, and wherever you want to check the output write
[%%expect]
. Then run the tool on the file. It will fill the
[%%expect]
nodes with the real output and write the result in a
.corrected
file. For convenience, the tool will output the diff
between the original file and the corrected one. You can then copy the
.corrected
file.
For instance:
$ cat test.ml
let x = 1 + 'e'
[%%expect]
type t = intt
[%%expect]
$ ocaml-expect test.ml
---test.ml
+++test.ml.corrected
@@@@@@@@@@ -1,6 +1,14 @@@@@@@@@@
let x = 1 + 'e'
-|[%%expect]
+|[%%expect{|
+|Line _, characters 12-15:
+|Error: This expression has type char but an expression was expected of type
+| int
+||}]
type t = intt
-|[%%expect]
+|[%%expect{|
+|Line _, characters 9-13:
+|Error: Unbound type constructor intt
+|Hint: Did you mean int?
+||}]
$ cp test.ml.corrected test.ml
$ ocaml-expect test.ml && echo success
success
Warning: be sure to write [%%expect]
with 2 percent signs
Note that you can use whatever directives you use in the toplevel:
#load
, #use
, ...
The matching of the toplevel output against the expectation is done
using ppx_expect. This
mean that you can use the same modifiers such as (glob)
or
(regexp)
in expectations.
ocaml-expect doesn't print the toplevel outcome in case of success.
This is because it is often used to test errors. You can change this
behavior at any time using the directive #verbose
:
#verbose true;;
let x = 6 * 7
[%expect{|
val x : int = 42
|}]
By default ocaml-expect hides line numbers in error messages, as they
can change often and produce useless diffs. You can enable them using
the directive #print_line_numbers
:
#print_line_numbers true;;
let x = 1 + 2
[%%expect{|
Line 2, characters 12-15:
Error: This expression has type char but an expression was expected of type
int
|}]
You can also enable just column numbers, which change less often due to
edits in preceding code. Use the directive #print_column_numbers
:
#print_column_numbers true;;
let x = 1 + 2
[%%expect{|
Line _, characters 12-15:
Error: This expression has type char but an expression was expected of type
int
|}]
Sometimes values contains line numbers, either from a ppx rewriter or
from some special value such as Pervasives.__LOC__
. Whenever the
expection before some code capturing the line number changes, the line
number will change. This can create annoying differences in a test
suite.
There are three ways to make line numbers predictable:
- write tests sensitive on the location in a file with a single
[%%expect]
node - force the line number with the directive
#reset_line_numbers
- force line numbers repeatedly with a single use of the directive
#reset_line_numbers_after_expect
For instance:
Array.make n 0
[%expect{|
- : int array = [|0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0|]
|}]
#reset_line_numbers;;
__LINE__
[%expect{|
- : int = 1
|}]
Or:
#reset_line_numbers_after_expect true;;
let _ = __LINE__
[%expect{|
- : int = 1
|}]
let _ = __LINE__
[%expect{|
- : int = 1
|}]
Whatever the value of [n] is, the line number of __LINE__
will
always be 1.
Instead of the normal mode, you can ask the toplevel to produce a structured document containing a list of code blocks with the toplevel response.
This is useful when you want to include some code examples with their
output in a document. For that pass the flag -sexp
:
$ cat test.ml
#verbose true;;
let x = 42
[%%expect {|
val x : int = 42
|}]
$ ocaml-expect -sexp test.ml
((parts
(((name "")
(chunks
(((ocaml_code "#verbose true;;\
\n\
\nlet x = 42\
\n")
(toplevel_response "\
\nval x : int = 42\
\n")))))))
(matched false))
You can use the library toplevel_expect_test.types
to interpret the
output. You can see the types in types/toplevel_expect_test_types.mli
.
In addition you can add [@@@part "blah"]
attributes in your code to
organize it. This gives you an easy way to split the results in
different part of the final document.
You can build a custom toplevel following this example:
$ echo 'Toplevel_expect_test.Main.main ()' > main.ml
$ ocamlfind ocamlc -linkpkg -linkall -predicates create_toploop \
-package toplevel_expect_test -o foo