Add CometAPI integration and update documentation #6570
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds CometAPI as a new remote model provider to the application, enabling access to 500+ AI models through a unified API. The integration follows the established patterns for other model providers.
Key changes:
- Added CometAPI provider configuration with 20+ predefined models including GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, and Qwen series
- Created comprehensive documentation with setup instructions and troubleshooting guide
- Updated utility functions to support CometAPI logo and title display
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 6 out of 8 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| web-app/src/lib/utils.ts | Added CometAPI provider logo/title support and fixed string quote consistency |
| web-app/src/consts/providers.ts | Added complete CometAPI provider configuration with 20+ model definitions |
| tests/checklist.md | Added CometAPI to remote model providers testing checklist |
| docs/src/pages/docs/remote-models/cometapi.mdx | Created comprehensive CometAPI integration documentation |
| docs/src/pages/docs/remote-models/_meta.json | Added CometAPI navigation entry to documentation |
| autoqa/checklist.md | Added CometAPI to automated QA testing checklist |
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to 3d5142a in 2 minutes and 53 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
415lines of code in6files - Skipped
2files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
8draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. autoqa/checklist.md:102
- Draft comment:
CometAPI checkbox added to the Remote Model Providers list. Verify it appears correctly in the UI. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. docs/src/pages/docs/remote-models/_meta.json:30
- Draft comment:
CometAPI entry in _meta.json is correct with proper title and href. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
3. docs/src/pages/docs/remote-models/cometapi.mdx:1
- Draft comment:
The new CometAPI documentation is comprehensive. Verify the relative image path ('../_assets/cometapi.png') resolves correctly in the deployed docs. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
4. tests/checklist.md:108
- Draft comment:
CometAPI checklist item added in tests is consistent with the provider updates. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
5. web-app/src/consts/providers.ts:345
- Draft comment:
The CometAPI provider configuration is implemented correctly; however, review the models list for consistency with the documentation. For example, the GPT series in docs includes 'chatgpt-4o-latest' which is missing here, the Grok series names differ ('grok-4-0709' expected vs 'grok-4' provided), and some DeepSeek models (e.g., 'deepseek-v3' and 'deepseek-r1-0528') mentioned in the docs are omitted. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50% The comment is speculative since it references documentation we don't have access to. It's asking for verification rather than pointing out a definite issue. The comment also uses language like "review" and compares against models that "are mentioned in the docs" without providing concrete evidence that these models should definitely be included. The models listed could be intentionally different from the documentation - maybe they represent a newer or different set of supported models. Without access to the official CometAPI documentation, we can't verify if this is actually an issue. Even if the documentation exists, asking for verification or review without concrete evidence of an issue violates our rules about speculative comments and asking authors to verify things. The comment should be deleted as it's speculative, asks for verification, and doesn't provide strong evidence that there's actually an issue to fix.
6. web-app/src/lib/utils.ts:31
- Draft comment:
Addition of CometAPI in getProviderLogo and getProviderTitle looks correct and consistent. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
7. autoqa/checklist.md:108
- Draft comment:
There seems to be a typographical error in "Modesl". It should probably be "Models". - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
8. tests/checklist.md:115
- Draft comment:
Typographical: The sentence 'Ensure that a deleted model also not selectable or appear in old threads that used it.' is grammatically off. Consider rephrasing it (e.g., 'Ensure that a deleted model is not selectable and does not appear in old threads that used it.') - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
Workflow ID: wflow_N8CDWPZj6chfnFXL
You can customize 
- Added CometAPI to the remote model providers checklist. - Updated _meta.json to include CometAPI documentation link. - Modified yarn.lock to reflect changes in dependencies. - Implemented CometAPI provider in providers.ts with model configurations. - Enhanced utility functions to support CometAPI logo and title retrieval. - Created comprehensive documentation for CometAPI integration in cometapi.mdx. - Added CometAPI SVG logo to the public images directory.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
TensorNull
force-pushed
the
feat/cometapi
branch
from
249619e to
5e602d5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
Copilot reviewed 6 out of 8 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
Copilot reviewed 6 out of 8 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
|
@Minh141120 |
|
HI @TensorNull, Really appreciate the time and effort you’ve put into this PR, thank you for taking the initiative. I just wanted to clarify that integrations with cloud model providers are generally coordinated through our business development (BD) process, rather than being added directly through open PRs Sorry for any confusion here and thanks again for your work on this and for your understanding! |
|
@Minh141120 |
|
Really appreciate your kind words, I’ve cc’d @eckartal , who handles our business development partnerships, to continue the conversation with you and your team regarding the cooperation details. Looking forward to the discussion |
Hey @TensorNull, it'd be awesome. Please ping me on Slack at emre@menlo.ai. |
@eckartal Thanks ,well noted. I've sent Emre an invitation on Slack（This is Chen, Commercial Director from CometAPI） |
4 participants
Describe Your Changes
Fixes Issues
Self Checklist
Screenshot
Important
Add CometAPI integration with model configurations, update documentation, and modify utility functions for support.
providers.tswith model configurations and API settings.utils.tsto support CometAPI logo and title retrieval.cometapi.mdxfor comprehensive CometAPI integration guide._meta.jsonto include CometAPI documentation link.autoqa/checklist.mdandtests/checklist.mdunder Remote Model Providers.yarn.lockto reflect changes in dependencies.This description was created by
for 3d5142a. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.