Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RDS option and param groups should count only custom, not default #154

Closed
jantman opened this issue Mar 11, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

RDS option and param groups should count only custom, not default #154

jantman opened this issue Mar 11, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@jantman
Copy link
Owner

jantman commented Mar 11, 2016

Right now the usage information for RDS option and parameter groups (including cluster) is counting default ones too, not just custom. It should just count custom.

@jantman jantman added the bug label Mar 11, 2016
@jantman jantman added this to the 0.4.0 - Additional Services milestone Mar 11, 2016
@jantman
Copy link
Owner Author

jantman commented Mar 11, 2016

Default parameter groups have a name of "default." and a description of "Default parameter group for ".

Default cluster parameter groups have a name of "default." and a description of "Default cluster parameter group for ".

Default option groups have a name of "default:{engine}-{engine_version}", where engine_version has dots converted to dashes, and the engine name is a lower-cased, normalized string. Their description is "Default option group for {engine} {engine_version}" where engine is a lower-cased, normalized string but the version is the normal dot-separated one.

jantman added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2016
…escribeAccountAttributes usage information, for all limits other than those which are per-resource and need resource IDs (Max auths per security group, Read replicas per master, Subnets per Subnet Group)
jantman added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2016
jantman added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2016
jantman added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2016
@jantman
Copy link
Owner Author

jantman commented Mar 12, 2016

This has been merged to develop as of 19a2526

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants
@jantman and others