Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#162] Don't cancel possible transitions even though it is the future of one of those that is cancelled #168

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 20, 2020

Conversation

javrasya
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@javrasya javrasya force-pushed the issue-162-dont-cancel-possible-transitions branch from b04159c to 0c46393 Compare July 20, 2020 09:34
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 80.217% when pulling 0c46393 on issue-162-dont-cancel-possible-transitions into f693cdb on master.

3 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 80.217% when pulling 0c46393 on issue-162-dont-cancel-possible-transitions into f693cdb on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 80.217% when pulling 0c46393 on issue-162-dont-cancel-possible-transitions into f693cdb on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 80.217% when pulling 0c46393 on issue-162-dont-cancel-possible-transitions into f693cdb on master.

…le future just because they are also in the future of impossible transition path
@javrasya javrasya merged commit 80b3359 into master Jul 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants