You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'd like your opinion on the matter. In the original source code, Grunt is referenced in the comments. However, I like both Grunt and Webpack, with WP2 being just a little higher.
I kind of get Gulp, but it's more a fault of mine than theirs, as I have properly configured it before. To me, though, it doesn't feel quite right. Of course, I'd like your opinions on the matter, as well as pull requests being open.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So we have a dependency chart now, using [`yarn`][yarn] and NPM. The
entries to the `.gitignore` file are for various editors, as well as if
you just need a temp folder to try something in.
[yarn]: https://yarnpkg.com
I know the original used [`grunt`][grunt-cli] (the references to it are
all over the license.js file), but maybe something like Webpack moving
forward? (See #1)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Sifuentes <jayands@users.noreply.github.com>
I'd like your opinion on the matter. In the original source code, Grunt is referenced in the comments. However, I like both Grunt and Webpack, with WP2 being just a little higher.
I kind of get Gulp, but it's more a fault of mine than theirs, as I have properly configured it before. To me, though, it doesn't feel quite right. Of course, I'd like your opinions on the matter, as well as pull requests being open.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: