Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update pyjwt to 1.5.1 #259

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

pyup-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

There's a new version of PyJWT available.
You are currently using 1.4.2. I have updated it to 1.5.1

These links might come in handy: PyPI | Changelog | Repo

Changelog

1.5.1

1.5.0

1.4.21.4.2


Fixed

  • A PEM-formatted key encoded as bytes could cause a TypeError to be raised 213

1.4.11.4.1


Fixed

  • Newer versions of Pytest could not detect warnings properly 182
  • Non-string 'kid' value now raises InvalidTokenError 174
  • jwt.decode(None) now gracefully fails with InvalidTokenError 183

Got merge conflicts? Close this PR and delete the branch. I'll create a new PR for you.

Happy merging! 🤖

@pyup-bot pyup-bot mentioned this pull request Jun 22, 2017
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #259 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #259   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files           5      5           
  Lines          64     64           
=====================================
  Hits           64     64

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 104a0ef...c23a64a. Read the comment docs.

@pyup-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing this in favor of #260

@pyup-bot pyup-bot closed this Jun 22, 2017
@jayfk jayfk deleted the pyup-update-pyjwt-1.4.2-to-1.5.1 branch June 22, 2017 16:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants