Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support urlencoding/decoding for hostname #181

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Dec 12, 2022
Merged

Conversation

Dresdn
Copy link
Contributor

@Dresdn Dresdn commented Sep 1, 2022

This resolves the conflicts within PR #148, and (I believe) supersedes PR #113. Issue #132 will be closed after nearly 4 years.

jared-hardy and others added 4 commits October 6, 2021 10:13
Use URL Parse library for what it's good for: to decode % URL encode strings. Don't do it here -- we're already importing a better library for that!
Add synthetic test correlating to Google Cloud SQL connector socket, to make sure Issue jazzband#132 is solved.
Testing port and connector socket path together is unnecessary, possibly excessive.
@Dresdn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dresdn commented Sep 1, 2022

Paging @mattseymour - this can close out nearly 4 years of open issues and PRs.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 1, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #181 (fd0b22e) into master (d2e4719) will increase coverage by 2.98%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #181      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.56%   89.55%   +2.98%     
==========================================
  Files           1        1              
  Lines          67       67              
  Branches       14       14              
==========================================
+ Hits           58       60       +2     
+ Misses          4        3       -1     
+ Partials        5        4       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
dj_database_url.py 89.55% <100.00%> (+2.98%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@palfrey
Copy link
Member

palfrey commented Dec 11, 2022

@Dresdn #183 appears to have removed EXPECTED_POSTGRES_ENGINE so if you can fix the tests I can get this merged in.

@Dresdn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dresdn commented Dec 12, 2022

@Dresdn #183 appears to have removed EXPECTED_POSTGRES_ENGINE so if you can fix the tests I can get this merged in.

All set @palfrey

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants