Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update compatibility matrix #1937

Closed
astrojuanlu opened this issue Jul 25, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1950
Closed

Update compatibility matrix #1937

astrojuanlu opened this issue Jul 25, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1950
Labels
docs Documentation related good first issue A good item for first time contributors to work on help wanted Request help from the community maintenance Related to maintenance processes PR wanted Feature is discussed or bug is confirmed, PR needed

Comments

@astrojuanlu
Copy link
Contributor

What's the problem this feature will solve?

After gh-1879, I don't think https://github.com/jazzband/pip-tools#versions-and-compatibility was updated.

Describe the solution you'd like

Alternative Solutions

Additional context

@atugushev atugushev added the docs Documentation related label Jul 25, 2023
@chrysle chrysle added the good first issue A good item for first time contributors to work on label Jul 25, 2023
@webknjaz webknjaz added PR wanted Feature is discussed or bug is confirmed, PR needed help wanted Request help from the community maintenance Related to maintenance processes labels Jul 25, 2023
atugushev pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 4, 2023
As noted in #1937, this matrix is out of date now that https://github.com/jazzband/pip-tools/releases/tag/7.0.0 has shipped.

Technically it could be kept around and add some more rows, but I don't think it's worth the effort... it will always be going out of date. Instead, let the internal dep constraints within `setup.py`/`pyproject.toml` constrain what versions of `python` / `pip` are compatible with that version of `pip-tools`. Most users won't care, but those who will can access that data manually. And otherwise it'll all be smoothly resolved by package managers.

So let's just remove it altogether.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation related good first issue A good item for first time contributors to work on help wanted Request help from the community maintenance Related to maintenance processes PR wanted Feature is discussed or bug is confirmed, PR needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants