fix for Value too long for column EXECUTIONEXCEPTION #19
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
With @lob, is there a way to limit the length of the text value for this EXECUTIONEXCEPTION column? With jdbc job repository, we try to truncate this value to a reasonable limit before saving to the table. |
|
Yes, this should do it ! |
chengfang
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2023
|
Thanks @amoscatelli ! |
|
@chengfang is there an ETA for the next release ? |
|
I'll try to release it this week. |
|
https://github.com/jberet/jberet-jpa-repository/releases/tag/2.1.4.Final is released today 02/02/2023. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@chengfang hi !
I noticed that sometime I get an exception, Value too long for column, probably because the stacktrace is longer.
Without the @lob annotation, max length is 255.
According to the EXECUTION_EXCEPTION_LENGTH_LIMIT, defined also in the jdbc implementation, this limit should be 2048.
I didn't notice this before, can you merge please ?