JBERET-561 Change visibility of scopes implementations

[chengfang]

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JBERET-561

Required by quarkiverse/quarkus-jberet#123

[luca-bassoricci]

quarkiverse/quarkus-jberet#123 (comment)

[luca-bassoricci]

quarkiverse/quarkus-jberet#123 (comment)

[liweinan]

@chengfang Can I merge this PR now? In addition, can I port this into the main branch?

[chengfang]

@liweinan changes in this PR by and large should still work. But watch out for recent changes in Quarkus api. As I noted in the related quarkus PR: "Also note that the latest quarkus InjectableContext interface has changed: there is now a destroy(ContextState) method replacing destroy(Contextual<?>)."

I was just searching for quarkus class InjectableContext, but couldn't find it anymore; it probably relocated or removed or just I didn't look carefully enough.

So need to make sure this PR will still work with latest, or recent versions of Quarkus that the user intends to support.

[luca-bassoricci]

@liweinan let me update my PR with latest Quarkus and JBeret code.
I'll ping you when I am done.

[luca-bassoricci]

@liweinan
quarkiverse/quarkus-jberet#123 (comment)
I also aligned code to latest jberet codebase but this PR is still bounded to pre-jakarta.
I'm waiting for @radcortez's response because I would like to avoid you to merge an incomplete PR.

[liweinan]

@luca-bassoricci Thanks for the update! In addition do you want to add more commits into this PR?

[luca-bassoricci]

I haven't additional modification.
From my POV what has been done since now should be enough.

[liweinan]

@luca-bassoricci Okay! If anything else need me to change please let me know.

[liweinan]

quarkiverse/quarkus-jberet#123

[liweinan]

@luca-bassoricci I'll be on PTO next week(and it will be two weeks holidays), if we can finish this by this weekend that would be great :D

[liweinan]

btw I start to do the TCK testing for this PR. @chengfang

[luca-bassoricci]

@luca-bassoricci I'll be on PTO next week(and it will be two weeks holidays), if we can finish this by this weekend that would be great :D

On I have already prepared a pipeline (quarkiverse/quarkus-jberet@a38ed7b) to build the current main on my side and use the generated artifacts as dependency; I suppose I can use this PR branch but code need to be aligned to JBeret 2.x codebase before.

[liweinan]

@luca-bassoricci Okay! When you are ready please let me know :)

Meanwhile I'll do the tck testing.

[luca-bassoricci]

On my side I'm ready: you have to align this PR to jberet 2.x because on quakus-jberet extension we dropped support for Quarkus 2.x in favor of Quarkus 3 (which use jakarta namespace).
If you don't want to merge I can use chengfang:scope-impl-public-JBERET-561 on my side to make a build and see if all is working fine; I just write quarkiverse/quarkus-jberet#123 (comment) to @radcortez for an advice because I have no experience about PR using external project as depencency.

let me know! 👍

[liweinan]

@luca-bassoricci okay I'll work on my side once I finish testing I'll merge this and do the patching for other branches.

[liweinan]

I have added CI test to the branch and I need to do the TCK testing for this PR. Today is too late for me, I'll try to finish working on this by this week(and also on branch 2.x together with the main branch). If I can't complete this by this weekend I'll finish working on this next week.

[liweinan]

@luca-bassoricci If you don't need the patch on this branch anymore, I'll close it.

[luca-bassoricci]

@luca-bassoricci If you don't need the patch on this branch anymore, I'll close it.

Feel free to close it!