Advice for using mise on projects where collaborators use asdf?

[KyleKing]

With the recent mise update, there are stricter errors when a tool can't be found, such as pipx-installed Python dependencies

As an example, this is the .tool-versions file

textract-py3 2.0.1

Which generates a lot of noisy mise errors with:

mise ERROR [~/Developer/project/.tool-versions] textract-py3@2.0.1: textract-py3 not found in mise tool registry
mise ERROR error resolving versions
mise ERROR Run with --verbose or MISE_VERBOSE=1 for more information

I have a mise.toml in the same directory that contains:

[tools]
"pipx:textract-py3" = "2.0.1"

But mise still errors. Shouldn't mise.toml take precedence?

Replacing .tool-versions with mise.toml isn't viable because of the high switching cost to change our tooling right now. I was the one that migrated us to asfd in the first place when I joined before mise existed

Edit: just updated mise and looks like the errors are gone even if mise.toml doesn't exist (and the new feature for converting .tool-versions to mise's config 🎉)

[jdx]

But mise still errors. Shouldn't mise.toml take precedence?

no because pipx:textract-py3 is not the same as textract-py3. It's possible different backends could provide different tools, e.g.: npm:foo and pipx:foo so they can't override.

I don't have a great suggestion other than just ignoring .tool-versions or the tool.

[KyleKing]

Thanks! TIL about disable_tools, which addresses my needs

mise settings disable_tools textrat-py3,extract-msg