Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Manual file upload bug fix #261

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

MatthewErispe
Copy link
Collaborator

@MatthewErispe MatthewErispe commented Jun 22, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved stability by adding null checks for configuration settings in the file upload process, reducing the likelihood of errors during file uploads.

@rcrichton
Copy link
Member

Task linked: CU-86bzappvg Manual File Upload Fix

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes in SPInteractions.java include an addition of a null check for uploadConfig before accessing the uploadWorkflow. This change affects the branching logic within the open method, ensuring that the null condition for uploadConfig is handled properly before performing subsequent equality checks for UPLOAD_WORKFLOW_EM.

Changes

File Change Summary
...src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/controller/SPInteractions.java Added a null check for uploadConfig in the open method, altering the branching logic related to uploadWorkflow.

Poem

In code's deep heart where branches glide,
With careful checks and logic tied,
A null appears, but fear no more,
For SPInteractions now ensures the score.
Upload flows with grace and might,
Our code is strong, the future bright!
🚀✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef76459 and 0d6679c.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Controller/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/controller/SPInteractions.java (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Controller/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/controller/SPInteractions.java (1)

48-53: Ensure null safety in branching conditions.

The added null check before accessing uploadWorkflow is a good practice to avoid null pointer exceptions. However, ensure that the uploadConfig object's properties are properly initialized elsewhere in the code to prevent any unexpected null values.

Verification successful

Ensure null safety in branching conditions.

The UploadConfig class uses the record keyword and includes properties that can potentially be null. Since uploadWorkflow is an Integer, it can be null unless properly initialized. The added null check in the branching logic is a good practice to avoid null pointer exceptions. However, it is crucial to ensure that wherever UploadConfig is instantiated, it is properly initialized to prevent any unexpected null values.

  • File: JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Controller/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/controller/SPInteractions.java
  • Lines: 48-53
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the initialization of uploadConfig properties.

# Test: Search for `uploadConfig` initializations. Expect: Proper initializations without any `null` values.
rg --type java $'uploadConfig = new UploadConfig'

Length of output: 50



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the initialization and assignment of uploadConfig properties.

# Search for assignments to uploadConfig.
rg --type java 'uploadConfig\s*='

# Search for method calls that might initialize uploadConfig.
rg --type java '\.setUploadConfig\('

Length of output: 255



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Inspect the context of `uploadConfig` assignment in `Routes.java`.

# Extract lines around the assignment to understand the context.
rg --type java --context 10 'var uploadConfig =' JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibAPI/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/libapi/Routes.java

Length of output: 2516



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Inspect the `UploadConfig` class for proper initialization of its properties.

# Extract the `UploadConfig` class definition.
rg --type java 'class UploadConfig' --context 20

Length of output: 50



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for `UploadConfig` class definition across the entire codebase.

# Search for the `UploadConfig` class definition.
rg 'class UploadConfig' --context 20

Length of output: 38



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for references or imports of `UploadConfig` to locate its definition.

# Search for references to `UploadConfig`.
rg 'UploadConfig'

# Search for imports of `UploadConfig`.
rg 'import .*UploadConfig'

Length of output: 2344



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Inspect the `UploadConfig` class definition in the found file.

# Extract the `UploadConfig` class definition.
rg --type java --context 20 'public record UploadConfig' JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/models/UploadConfig.java

Length of output: 987

Comment on lines +59 to +63
.uploadConfig() == null || batchPatient.sessionMetadata()
.commonMetaData()
.uploadConfig()
.uploadWorkflow()
.equals(UploadConfig.UploadWorkflow.UPLOAD_WORKFLOW_LINK);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refactor branching logic for clarity.

Consider refactoring the branching logic to separate the null check from the workflow check to enhance readability. This change can help future developers quickly understand the conditions being checked.

- .uploadConfig() == null || batchPatient.sessionMetadata()
-                                        .commonMetaData()
-                                        .uploadConfig()
-                                        .uploadWorkflow()
-                                        .equals(UploadConfig.UploadWorkflow.UPLOAD_WORKFLOW_LINK);
+ boolean isUploadConfigNull = batchPatient.sessionMetadata()
+                                           .commonMetaData()
+                                           .uploadConfig() == null;
+ boolean isUploadWorkflowLink = batchPatient.sessionMetadata()
+                                              .commonMetaData()
+                                              .uploadConfig()
+                                              .uploadWorkflow()
+                                              .equals(UploadConfig.UploadWorkflow.UPLOAD_WORKFLOW_LINK);
+ return isUploadConfigNull || isUploadWorkflowLink;

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

@martino-jembi martino-jembi merged commit 26611b3 into dev Jun 28, 2024
5 checks passed
@martino-jembi martino-jembi deleted the CU-86bzappvg_Manual-File-Upload-Fix branch June 28, 2024 06:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants