Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/dynamic env #74

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 23, 2024
Merged

Feat/dynamic env #74

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 23, 2024

Conversation

jacob-khoza-symb
Copy link
Collaborator

@jacob-khoza-symb jacob-khoza-symb commented Sep 19, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced API routes to ensure dynamic responses without caching for improved data accuracy.
    • Introduced unstable_noStore to prevent caching in various endpoints, ensuring real-time data retrieval.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved logging clarity across multiple routes for better maintainability.
  • Documentation

    • Updated comments and formatting for better readability and consistency throughout the codebase.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes consist of formatting adjustments and enhancements to caching behavior across multiple API route files. Key modifications include the addition of unstable_noStore() to prevent caching responses and the export of dynamic set to 'force-dynamic' to ensure fresh data retrieval. Logging statements have been reformatted for improved readability, while the core functionality and logic of the routes remain unchanged.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/app/api/route.ts Formatting adjustments including single quotes for imports and added semicolon.
src/app/api/v1/server-configs/route.ts Added unstable_noStore and set dynamic to 'force-dynamic'.
src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/accesses/route.ts Introduced unstable_noStore and set dynamic to 'force-dynamic' in POST.
src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/deactivate/route.ts Added unstable_noStore in DELETE and set dynamic to 'force-dynamic'.
src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/endpoints/[endpointId]/route.ts Introduced unstable_noStore in GET and set dynamic to 'force-dynamic'.
src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/endpoints/route.ts Added unstable_noStore in POST and set dynamic to 'force-dynamic'.
src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/qrcode/route.ts Introduced unstable_noStore in POST and set dynamic to 'force-dynamic'.
src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/route.ts Added unstable_noStore in POST and PUT.
src/app/api/v1/share-links/route.ts Added unstable_noStore in POST and GET, set dynamic to 'force-dynamic'.
src/app/api/v1/users/[id]/ips/route.ts Introduced unstable_noStore in GET and set dynamic to 'force-dynamic'.
src/app/api/v1/users/[id]/route.ts Added unstable_noStore in GET and set dynamic to 'force-dynamic'.
src/app/api/v1/users/route.ts Added unstable_noStore in POST and set dynamic to 'force-dynamic'.

Possibly related PRs

  • Feat/api authentication #45: The changes in this PR involve user authentication enhancements, which may relate to the logging and formatting changes in the main PR, particularly in how user-related data is handled.
  • Feat/get shlink accesses #47: This PR focuses on share link accesses, which is relevant to the main PR's changes in the src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/accesses/route.ts file, particularly regarding logging and response handling.
  • Added swagger docs. Refactored code and tests. #49: The updates in this PR include Swagger documentation for various endpoints, which may connect to the main PR's focus on improving code consistency and clarity in API responses.
  • Updated swagger docs. Fixed minor bugs. #57: This PR includes updates to Swagger documentation and minor bug fixes, which could relate to the main PR's emphasis on code formatting and consistency improvements.

Suggested reviewers

  • BMartinos
  • yassinedorbozgithub
  • godchiSymbionix

Poem

🐇 In the code where rabbits hop,
Caching's gone, no need to stop.
Fresh data flows like morning dew,
With logs so clear, we see right through.
Dynamic routes, a joyful cheer,
In every byte, the springtime's near! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/app/api/v1/users/route.ts (1)

53-53: Disabling caching for the POST request is appropriate, but be cautious of the unstable API.

Invoking unstable_noStore within the POST request handler is a good approach to ensure that user creation requests always return the most current data without relying on potentially stale cached responses.

However, please note that the unstable_noStore function is marked as unstable, indicating that its API may change in future versions of Next.js. Keep an eye on Next.js updates and be prepared to adapt to any changes to this API.

src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/accesses/route.ts (1)

1-1: LGTM! Consider tracking the stability of the unstable_noStore() API.

The use of unstable_noStore() is appropriate for ensuring that the API always returns the latest data. However, since it's an experimental API, it's important to track its stability across Next.js versions and update the code if the API changes.

Consider creating a task to periodically check the status of the unstable_noStore() API and update the code if needed.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between de0f676 and ebc0661.

Files selected for processing (12)
  • src/app/api/route.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/app/api/v1/server-configs/route.ts (4 hunks)
  • src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/accesses/route.ts (4 hunks)
  • src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/deactivate/route.ts (3 hunks)
  • src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/endpoints/[endpointId]/route.ts (4 hunks)
  • src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/endpoints/route.ts (3 hunks)
  • src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/qrcode/route.ts (3 hunks)
  • src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/route.ts (4 hunks)
  • src/app/api/v1/share-links/route.ts (4 hunks)
  • src/app/api/v1/users/[id]/ips/route.ts (3 hunks)
  • src/app/api/v1/users/[id]/route.ts (3 hunks)
  • src/app/api/v1/users/route.ts (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/app/api/route.ts
Additional comments not posted (33)
src/app/api/v1/users/[id]/route.ts (5)

1-1: LGTM!

The import of unstable_noStore from next/cache is a good practice to ensure that the response is not cached, which is crucial for dynamic data retrieval scenarios.


13-14: LGTM!

The declaration of export const dynamic = 'force-dynamic'; is a good addition that explicitly sets the route's dynamic behavior. This change, along with the import of unstable_noStore, ensures that fresh data is always fetched rather than relying on potentially stale cached responses.


17-17: LGTM!

The instantiation of LogHandler with __dirname as the argument is a good practice for logging as it provides context about the location of the log statements.


43-43: LGTM!

The addition of a semicolon to the logging statement is a minor syntactical change that contributes to overall code quality and readability.


45-45: LGTM!

The call to unstable_noStore(); within the GET function is consistent with the import of unstable_noStore and the declaration of export const dynamic = 'force-dynamic';. This ensures that the response is not cached, which is crucial for dynamic data retrieval scenarios.

src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/deactivate/route.ts (2)

13-13: LGTM! The dynamic export ensures fresh data on every request.

Setting export const dynamic = 'force-dynamic'; is a good choice for this route. It ensures that the route is always treated as dynamic, disabling caching and forcing fresh data to be fetched on every request. This is important for critical operations like deactivating a share link, where the most current state should always be reflected in the response.

While this may have a slight performance impact due to the lack of caching, it enhances the reliability and accuracy of the API.


45-45: LGTM! The unstable_noStore() call prevents response caching.

Calling unstable_noStore() within the DELETE route handler is a good practice for this API endpoint. It prevents the response from being cached, ensuring that each request to deactivate a share link is processed independently without relying on any previously cached data.

This change enhances the reliability of the API by guaranteeing that the most current state of the share link is always reflected in the response. While it may have a slight performance impact due to the lack of caching, it is a necessary trade-off for critical operations like deactivating a share link.

Note: The unstable_ prefix suggests that this API is currently experimental and may change in future versions of Next.js. Keep an eye on the Next.js documentation for any updates or changes to this API.

src/app/api/v1/users/route.ts (1)

19-19: Verify the need for forcing dynamic rendering.

Setting dynamic to 'force-dynamic' disables caching and forces the route to always fetch the latest data. While this ensures the most up-to-date data, it can impact performance.

Please confirm that this route requires always fetching the latest data and consider the potential performance implications.

src/app/api/v1/users/[id]/ips/route.ts (5)

1-1: LGTM!

The import of unstable_noStore function from next/cache module is a good addition to enforce dynamic behavior and prevent caching of the API response.


18-18: LGTM!

Exporting dynamic as 'force-dynamic' is a good addition to ensure that the route always generates a fresh response rather than relying on cached data. This aligns well with the PR objective of enforcing dynamic behavior in the API route.


25-25: LGTM!

Initializing a new instance of the LogHandler class with the current directory path as an argument is a good practice for logging.


50-52: LGTM!

Logging the user ID from the request parameters is a good practice for debugging and tracing. Formatting the log message with line breaks improves readability and maintainability.


54-64: LGTM!

The code segment looks good and follows best practices:

  • Invoking the unstable_noStore function to prevent caching of the API response aligns with the PR objective of enforcing dynamic behavior in the API route.
  • Validating the user using the validateUser function is a good practice for authentication and authorization.
  • Retrieving the user using the getUserUseCase function is a good practice for separation of concerns and modularity.
  • Logging the stringified user object is a good practice for debugging and tracing.
  • Formatting the log message with line breaks improves readability and maintainability.
src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/qrcode/route.ts (4)

1-1: LGTM!

The import statement for unstable_noStore from next/cache is added correctly.


13-13: Dynamic export set to 'force-dynamic'.

Setting export const dynamic = 'force-dynamic'; forces the API route to be rendered on the server for every request, ensuring fresh data is fetched each time.

This is suitable for dynamic content that changes frequently or depends on real-time data. However, please note that it may impact performance if the API route is accessed frequently, as it disables caching and requires server-side rendering for each request.


54-56: Logging statement reformatted.

The logging statement is reformatted to improve readability without changing its functionality. This enhances code maintainability.


57-57: unstable_noStore() invoked to prevent response caching.

The unstable_noStore() function is called before fetching the share link data to ensure that the response generated by this API route is not cached by Next.js or any intermediate caches.

This aligns with the dynamic export set to 'force-dynamic', guaranteeing that each request to this API route generates a fresh response reflecting the latest data.

src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/accesses/route.ts (2)

19-19: Looks good!

Exporting dynamic with the value 'force-dynamic' is a good way to ensure that the route always serves dynamic content. This aligns well with the use of unstable_noStore() to prevent caching.


58-60: The changes look good!

  • The reformatted logging statement improves readability without changing the functionality.
  • Calling unstable_noStore() twice within the POST method emphasizes the intent to prevent caching of sensitive or frequently changing data related to share link accesses.
  • The placement of unstable_noStore() calls before fetching the share link and its accesses is appropriate.

Also applies to: 62-62, 71-71

src/app/api/v1/share-links/route.ts (3)

18-18: LGTM!

Exporting dynamic as 'force-dynamic' aligns with the goal of serving fresh content on every request by disabling caching and static generation.


47-51: LGTM!

The usage of unstable_noStore in the POST request handler ensures that the response is not cached, maintaining data freshness. The reformatted logging statement improves readability without altering functionality.


79-79: LGTM!

The usage of unstable_noStore in the GET request handler ensures that the response is not cached, maintaining data freshness.

src/app/api/v1/server-configs/route.ts (2)

Line range hint 47-62: LGTM!

The changes in the POST function look good:

  • The use of unstable_noStore is appropriate to prevent caching of the response for a dynamic route.
  • The validation of user roles is important to ensure only authorized users can create server configs.
  • The mapping of DTO to model and vice versa is a good practice to separate the API contract from the domain model.
  • The use of addServerConfigUseCase follows the clean architecture principles by separating the business logic from the API layer.
  • The error handling using handleApiValidationError is a good practice to handle validation errors consistently.

80-92: LGTM!

The changes in the GET function look good:

  • The use of unstable_noStore is appropriate to prevent caching of the response for a dynamic route.
  • The validation of user roles is important to ensure only authorized users can get server configs.
  • The use of getServerConfigsUseCase follows the clean architecture principles by separating the business logic from the API layer.
  • The mapping of models to DTOs is a good practice to separate the API contract from the domain model.
  • The error handling using handleApiValidationError is a good practice to handle validation errors consistently.
src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/endpoints/route.ts (3)

29-30: LGTM!

Exporting dynamic as 'force-dynamic' ensures that the route is always treated as dynamic. This aligns with the usage of unstable_noStore to control caching behavior and ensures that each request is processed without relying on cached data.


72-74: LGTM!

The reformatting of the logging statement improves readability without affecting functionality.


77-77: LGTM!

Calling unstable_noStore() in the POST function ensures that the response for creating a share link endpoint is not cached. This change alters the caching strategy intentionally to process each request fresh without relying on stale data.

src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/endpoints/[endpointId]/route.ts (3)

1-1: LGTM!

The import of unstable_noStore from next/cache is correct.

Note: The unstable_ prefix indicates that this is an experimental API and may change in future versions of Next.js. Keep an eye on the Next.js release notes for any updates or changes to this API.


27-27: LGTM!

Setting dynamic to 'force-dynamic' is correct.

This change ensures that the response is always generated dynamically and is not cached. This is useful for endpoints that return frequently updated or sensitive data, as it guarantees that the client always receives the most up-to-date information.


70-72: LGTM!

The reformatting of the logging statement at lines 70-72 improves readability without altering the logic.

The invocation of unstable_noStore() at line 75 is correct.

Calling unstable_noStore() at the beginning of the try block ensures that the response is not cached. This aligns with the dynamic export being set to 'force-dynamic', guaranteeing that fresh data is always retrieved for this endpoint.

Also applies to: 75-75

src/app/api/v1/share-links/[id]/route.ts (3)

87-92: LGTM!

The addition of unstable_noStore and the improvements to the logging statements look good. The changes align with the intended caching strategy and enhance code clarity without altering the core functionality.


114-124: LGTM!

The improvements to the logging statements look good. The changes enhance code clarity without altering the core functionality.


170-175: LGTM!

The addition of unstable_noStore and the improvements to the logging statements look good. The changes align with the intended caching strategy and enhance code clarity without altering the core functionality.

src/app/api/v1/share-links/route.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
@godchiSymbionix
Copy link
Collaborator

Aside this that I don't think export const dynamic = 'force-dynamic'; necessary. Everything else looks good

@jacob-khoza-symb jacob-khoza-symb merged commit 943445c into main Sep 23, 2024
3 checks passed
@jacob-khoza-symb jacob-khoza-symb deleted the feat/dynamic-env branch September 23, 2024 19:09
This was referenced Sep 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants