Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[JENKINS-71506] Support custom refspec in lightweight checkout - experiment #1552

Draft
wants to merge 24 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

balakine
Copy link

No description provided.

ckullabosch and others added 24 commits June 19, 2023 09:06
Let user specify a custom refspec to fetch.
Add support for branch names FETCH_HEAD or a commit hash.

This allows to use lightweight checkout for:

* Fetch the pipeline from a Gerrit change (refspec:
  refs/changes/*/change/patchset and branch: FETCH_HEAD).

* Fetch the pipeline from a fixed commit of a branch, instead of head
  (refspec: branch and branch: commit hash).
No need to apply that technique in one location when there are many
others that have the same issue.

This reverts commit 080cfb8.
Not clear to me how to resolve the spotbugs warning
Using the same string for the local as is used in the HeadNameResult
class was confusing me.  Rather than risk being confused when I read it
again later, let's rename it now.
Silences a spotbugs warning and helps my testing
The tests are passing null and have encountered no error with the null
argument
The field was only needed to calculte remoteHeadName, which is now
done inside the calculate() method.
@github-actions github-actions bot added the tests Automated test addition or improvement label Feb 14, 2024
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite added bug Incorrect or flawed behavior enhancement Improvement or new feature and removed tests Automated test addition or improvement bug Incorrect or flawed behavior labels Apr 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improvement or new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants