-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[JENKINS-47393] Remove signature and runtime references to CommandLauncher #79
Conversation
This pull request originates from a CloudBees employee. At CloudBees, we require that all pull requests be reviewed by other CloudBees employees before we seek to have the change accepted. If you want to learn more about our process please see this explanation. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it be possible to do the change in a compatible way, e.g. by introducing bridge methods and requiring the detached plugin to be installed?
The change introduces a breaking change in the JTH library, and IMHO it needs to be justified at least
Oh no.
Unlikely to be source-incompatible (not that we care greatly), and binary incompatibility is irrelevant. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Binary compatibility may be important for things like PCT, which probably bump JTH. But I agree it's not a blocker for the test framework (though it may cause fun for plugins shipping tests
artifacts).
The code itself LGTM, hence 🐝
AFAIK it does not. That was in fact one of the benefits of splitting |
For jenkinsci/jenkins#3076.
@reviewbybees