Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[JENKINS-65885] Revert "Merge pull request #153 from twasyl/synchronization-for-optimisation" #158

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2021

Conversation

bitwiseman
Copy link
Contributor

@bitwiseman bitwiseman commented Jun 16, 2021

Reverting #153.

  • Make sure you are opening from a topic/feature/bugfix branch (right side) and not your main branch!
  • Ensure that the pull request title represents the desired changelog entry
  • Please describe what you did
  • Link to relevant issues in GitHub or Jira
  • Link to relevant pull requests, esp. upstream and downstream changes
  • Ensure you have provided tests - that demonstrates feature works or fixes the issue

…isation"

This reverts commit 927249b, reversing
changes made to 620362f.
@bitwiseman bitwiseman changed the title Revert "Merge pull request #153 from twasyl/synchronization-for-optim… [JENKINS-65885] Revert "Merge pull request #153 from twasyl/synchronization-for-optim… Jun 16, 2021
@bitwiseman bitwiseman requested review from jglick and timja June 16, 2021 18:00
@jglick jglick changed the title [JENKINS-65885] Revert "Merge pull request #153 from twasyl/synchronization-for-optim… [JENKINS-65885] Revert "Merge pull request #153 from twasyl/synchronization-for-optimisation" Jun 16, 2021
Copy link
Member

@jglick jglick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as a hotfix

@bitwiseman bitwiseman merged commit 77c9983 into jenkinsci:master Jun 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants