Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(*): Lower Node requirement to 16.10 #12754

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 27, 2022
Merged

Conversation

lukeapage
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Node JS 16.11 brings in a change that has significant memory and performance issues with Jest - #11956. It has been identified as a upstream bug, but it has not been fixed. Since people who use yarn get the engine enforced (or decide to opt out for all packages) this pushes people upgrading to Jest 28 on to the buggy node version, which for large projects makes jest unworkable and small projects slower. So, as agreed on the bug I am lowering the required node v16 minor version to allow this work-around to continue to work.

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@SimenB SimenB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks!

@SimenB SimenB changed the title fix(*): Lower node requirement to 16.10 fix(*): Lower Node requirement to 16.10 Apr 27, 2022
@SimenB SimenB merged commit 9241321 into jestjs:main Apr 27, 2022
@lukeapage lukeapage deleted the node-16-10 branch April 27, 2022 07:03
F3n67u pushed a commit to F3n67u/jest that referenced this pull request May 2, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 28, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants