Skip to content

Conversation

@aylen384
Copy link
Contributor

@aylen384 aylen384 commented Oct 2, 2025

No description provided.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Oct 2, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

name: "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
url: "https://download.opensuse.org/distribution/leap/15.6/iso/openSUSE-Leap-15.6-NET-x86_64-Media.iso",
name: "openSUSE Leap 16.0",
url: "https://download.opensuse.org/distribution/leap/16.0/offline/Leap-16.0-online-installer-x86_64.install.iso",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't that be https://download.opensuse.org/distribution/leap/16.0/offline/Leap-16.0-offline-installer-x86_64.install.iso (note the 16.0-offline vs 16.0-online)?

Also, I'm getting a 403 for all releases at https://get.opensuse.org/leap/16.0 so this release might not actually be valid?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@aylen384 aylen384 Oct 2, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The release is official since yesterday. The image is the right one (I don't know why the folder has this unintuitive name, though) because one is the network install image and one is the desktop image.
Due to the file size and the (I suspect) less efficient random access to the virtual cdrom drive that are (I guess) mapped to http range requests, I would use the netboot image instead of the offline installation media (which is 4.7GB large).

The 403 only happens when accessing via web browser but not via curl/wget.
This seems to be an issue with the CDN that I just reported to the openSUSE admins.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Due to the file size and the (I suspect) less efficient random access to the virtual cdrom drive that are (I guess) mapped to http range requests, I would use the netboot image instead of the offline installation media (which is 4.7GB large).

Got it... wasn't sure you intentionally didn't point at a fully-offline install, but given we're just proxying the image, I see where the Network image is more reasonable.

@adamshiervani adamshiervani merged commit e755a6e into jetkvm:dev Oct 7, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants