Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bug 139 3.x #141

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 7, 2021
Merged

Bug 139 3.x #141

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 7, 2021

Conversation

paustint
Copy link
Collaborator

@paustint paustint commented Mar 7, 2021

  1. Date functions were not properly parsed when used in order by clauses. (Date functions should be allowed in ORDER BY clause #139)
  2. Modified names of functions / types (internal)
  3. Removed improper import of isString from node utils

resolves #139

paustint added 6 commits March 6, 2021 17:40
@paustint
Date functions should be allowed in ORDER BY clause #139
59b7537 
Added date functions to order by clause
Modified names of functions / types (internal)
Removed improper import of `isString` from node utils

#139 (version 2.5.6)
@paustint
Release 2.5.6
279b22b
@paustint
Updated docs version
6ba7021
@paustint
merge 2.5.6 to 3.0.2
8b2c287
@paustint
Release 3.0.2
a0cbcea
@paustint
Updated docs version
9579d87
@paustint paustint merged commit ba41279 into master Mar 7, 2021
@paustint paustint deleted the bug-139-3.x branch March 7, 2021 01:02
@paustint paustint restored the bug-139-3.x branch March 7, 2021 01:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Date functions should be allowed in ORDER BY clause
1 participant
@paustint