-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Various cleanups of Handler.insertHandler #10792
Merged
Merged
Changes from 12 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5302c29
Various cleanups of Handler.insertHandler
gregw 0198671
Various cleanups of Handler.insertHandler
gregw d6334f5
Various cleanups of Handler.insertHandler
gregw da9115c
Various cleanups of Handler.insertHandler
gregw 7eedb0e
Various cleanups of Handler.insertHandler
gregw f13848d
Merge branch 'jetty-12.0.x' into fix/jetty-12.0.x/9297/insertHandler
gregw a3dba53
Various cleanups of Handler.insertHandler
gregw 4d5f309
Various cleanups of Handler.insertHandler
gregw 98b62dd
Merge branch 'jetty-12.0.x' into fix/jetty-12.0.x/9297/insertHandler
gregw f0c76e9
Various cleanups of Handler.insertHandler
gregw 5c945a4
Various cleanups of Handler.insertHandler
gregw c59df50
Merge branch 'jetty-12.0.x' into fix/jetty-12.0.x/9297/insertHandler
gregw de76d91
Various cleanups of Handler.insertHandler
gregw 25631a3
Merge branch 'jetty-12.0.x' into fix/jetty-12.0.x/9297/insertHandler
gregw 3335350
Added missing call to relinkHandlers() in setHandler() after calling …
sbordet File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this logic is right.
Calling
setHandler()
with one of the 3 handlers will never work.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It has been this way for several years at least. So we are not making it special. It is already special.
I'm not sure we want to put a breaking change into the API without thought. I found a few places in the code that did rely on this behaviour, so other users may also.
I think if we want to change setHandler, that should be a different PR with more consideration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sbordet I've put the implementation of setHandler back to exactly what it has been for some time. However, this PR removes any usage of it that depends on that behaviour. If it is an issue, then we can make the method always warn if called on SCH.