Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue #4631 - Warning about skipping of <Arg> nodes is in wrong place for <Configure> #4632
Issue #4631 - Warning about skipping of <Arg> nodes is in wrong place for <Configure> #4632
Changes from all commits
b839ce6
cfdffd1
89f2cad
3ee3246
da7e8ed
69fa180
cc80ebe
ad3149c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like to see a test where there is a
Arg
misplaced, as below, so that we define in a test how we should behave.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gregw pointed out that the Configure_9_3.dtd (and Configure_10_0.dtd) does not allow a
<Arg>
anywhere but the start of the element list.https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/blob/678385bfda0f90a0bcccf7f86aa272073c1b4f29/jetty-xml/src/main/resources/org/eclipse/jetty/xml/configure_10_0.dtd#L45-L46
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A test that is expected to fail in this scenario is dependent on the dtd used (or not used) I would think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then shouldn't we do the same for
Call
andNew
? I don't think the DTD has the same enforcement for those.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Opened #4658 for these new test cases.
Also
<Call>
https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/blob/678385bfda0f90a0bcccf7f86aa272073c1b4f29/jetty-xml/src/main/resources/org/eclipse/jetty/xml/configure_10_0.dtd#L168-L169
And
<New>
https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/blob/678385bfda0f90a0bcccf7f86aa272073c1b4f29/jetty-xml/src/main/resources/org/eclipse/jetty/xml/configure_10_0.dtd#L209-L210
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also opened #4659 for the missing
Id?,Name?,Class?,Arg*
in the<Configure>
section onConfigure_10_0.dtd
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sbordet we had such a test, but that is invalid XML against the DTD. I don't think we should be required to process non-valid XML
Note that I'm doing a cleanup in 10 - see #4656