Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Amend Javadocs #3

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2018
Merged

Conversation

svanoort
Copy link

Implements the requested Javadoc clarification from jenkinsci#67

@jglick jglick merged commit 11b84be into jglick:VirtualFile-JENKINS-49635 Jun 15, 2018
@svanoort svanoort deleted the remote-docs branch June 15, 2018 16:40
jglick added a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2022
…r882853693

Example from `ExecutorStepDynamicContextTest.parallelNodeDisappearance`:

```
"Computer.threadPoolForRemoting [#3]" jenkinsci#89 daemon prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007f30d0c6a800 nid=0x6d0f9 in Object.wait() [0x00007f31047fe000]
   java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (on object monitor)
	at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
	at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:460)
	at hudson.remoting.AsyncFutureImpl.get(AsyncFutureImpl.java:97)
	- locked <0x00000000f83dd1e8> (a hudson.remoting.AsyncFutureImpl)
	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.support.steps.ExecutorStepDynamicContext.resume(ExecutorStepDynamicContext.java:108)
	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.support.steps.ExecutorStepExecution.onResume(ExecutorStepExecution.java:201)
	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.flow.FlowExecutionList$ParallelResumer.lambda$run$5(FlowExecutionList.java:369)
	at org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.flow.FlowExecutionList$ParallelResumer$$Lambda$350/265274739.run(Unknown Source)
	at jenkins.util.ContextResettingExecutorService$1.run(ContextResettingExecutorService.java:28)
	at jenkins.security.ImpersonatingExecutorService$1.run(ImpersonatingExecutorService.java:68)
	at …
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants