feat(readme): add tooling section to highlight djot tools for code editors #311
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Ryan Brue <ryanbrue.dev@gmail.com>
|
This is a good idea. I'll merge this, but we should probably also add https://github.com/treeman/tree-sitter-djot and perhaps the WIP https://gist.github.com/jgm/17e17d6730efc253078b23e12aefd3df |
jgm
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I propose we add a section to highlight tooling for djot from various editors. I've included the ones I know about, which are the vim tooling from this repo, and two visual studio code extensions (one of them my own, the other being an older extension I was using before making my own)