-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug; footnotes produce wrong markdown syntax? #6348
Comments
You're right, this isn't being recognized as a footnote; that could be improved. |
As I was looking at some of the recent JATS writer improvements the other day, it occurred to me to check if anyone else had noticed footnote reading issues. It's something we're running into increasingly with PubPub, so I wondered if there's been any interest or progress here. I may be getting way too ahead of myself here, but if I understand this correctly and it's a fairly simple parsing issue in the reader, it might be something I could try if someone wanted to point me in the right direction. |
Go for it! Look in the JATS reader code. I think this is roughly what needs to be done: we need to add special parsing for It looks like the treatment of @tarleb any thoughts? |
I'll be a bit slow to respond over the next couple of days, but I can take a look after that. |
Footnotes in `<fn-group>` elements are collected and re-inserted into the document as proper footnotes in the place where they are referenced. Fixes: jgm#6348
Footnotes in `<fn-group>` elements are collected and re-inserted into the document as proper footnotes in the place where they are referenced. Fixes: #6348
Problem
Hey there! I'm trying to convert JATS to markdown and I think Pandoc is producing incorrect markdown sytnax. Please let me know what you think!
Actual output
Expected output
or possibly
Additional info
Pandoc version
Command used
$ cat example.xml | pandoc -f jats -t markdown
Input used (example.xml from cmd)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: