Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Qt use in SVL examples #42

Open
pkazanzides opened this issue Feb 1, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Qt use in SVL examples #42

pkazanzides opened this issue Feb 1, 2016 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@pkazanzides
Copy link
Contributor

I just updated cisstStereoVision (6ec2e33) to add cisstQt to the list of required cisst libraries for the cameraviewer and videoplayer examples. Without this change, it does not compile on Windows with VS 2008 and Qt 4.8.5 (64-bit) because the compiler cannot find <QApplication>.

I noticed, however, that the CMakeLists.txt initially specifies that cisstStereoVisionQt (and now cisstQt) are required, whereas later in the file it checks the CISST_HAS_QT4 setting to determine whether to link with the cisstStereoVisionQt library. This does not seem to be the best implementation. Also, what about Qt5?

@pkazanzides
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also, what is the difference between the videoplayer/cameraviewer SVL examples and the cisstVideoPlayer and cisstCameraViewer SVL applications? Are the former obsolete? If so, should we delete them?

@bvagvol1
Copy link

bvagvol1 commented Feb 1, 2016

The examples and applications are somewhat different now. They were split while I was away. I will take a look and see if there’s a way to simplify.

On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:43 AM, Peter Kazanzides notifications@github.com wrote:

Also, what is the difference between the videoplayer/cameraviewer SVL examples and the cisstVideoPlayer and cisstCameraViewer SVL applications? Are the former obsolete? If so, should we delete them?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #42 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants