Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #91 from mathzhuonichi/master
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Team_F_project_changed_Ray_ex.lean
  • Loading branch information
jjdishere authored Sep 20, 2023
2 parents 62cc3b5 + 4a5b2d5 commit fd01b0a
Showing 1 changed file with 316 additions and 29 deletions.
345 changes: 316 additions & 29 deletions EuclideanGeometry/Foundation/Axiom/Linear/Ray_ex.lean
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -18,12 +18,19 @@ def Seg.reverse (seg : Seg P): Seg P where
target := seg.source

-- reversing the toDir does not change the nontriviality of a generalized directed segment.
theorem nd_of_rev_of_nd {seg : Seg P} (nd : seg.is_nd) : seg.reverse.is_nd := sorry
theorem nd_of_rev_of_nd {seg : Seg P} (nd : seg.is_nd) : seg.reverse.is_nd := by
-- sorry
simp only [Seg.is_nd]
push_neg
symm
apply nd

def Seg_nd.reverse : Seg_nd P := ⟨seg_nd.1.reverse, nd_of_rev_of_nd seg_nd.2

-- double reverse a ray gets back to itself
theorem Ray.rev_rev_eq_self : ray.reverse.reverse = ray := sorry
theorem Ray.rev_rev_eq_self : ray.reverse.reverse = ray := by
-- sorry
simp only [reverse, neg_neg]

-- double reverse a generalized directed segment gets back to itself
theorem Seg.rev_rev_eq_self : seg.reverse.reverse = seg := rfl
Expand All @@ -33,48 +40,328 @@ theorem Seg_nd.rev_rev_eq_self : seg_nd.reverse.reverse = seg_nd := rfl
theorem Seg_nd.rev_toSeg_eq_toSeg_rev : seg_nd.1.reverse = seg_nd.reverse.1 := rfl

-- reversing the toDir does not change the property that a point lies on the generalized directed segments.
theorem Seg.lies_on_rev_iff_lie_son {A : P} (lieson : A LiesOn seg) : A LiesOn seg.reverse := sorry

theorem eq_source_iff_lies_on_ray_lies_on_ray_rev {A : P} : A = ray.source ↔ (A LiesOn ray) ∧ (A LiesOn ray.reverse) := sorry

theorem not_lies_on_of_lies_int_rev {A : P} (liesint : A LiesInt ray.reverse) : ¬ A LiesOn ray := sorry

theorem not_lies_int_of_lies_on_rev {A : P} (liesint : A LiesOn ray.reverse) : ¬ A LiesInt ray := sorry

-- A point lies on the directed segment if and only if it lies on the ray associated to the segment and the ray associated to the reverse of this segment.
theorem lies_on_iff_lies_on_toRay_and_rev_toRay {A : P} : A LiesOn seg_nd.1 ↔ (A LiesOn seg_nd.toRay) ∧ (A LiesOn seg_nd.reverse.toRay) := sorry
theorem Seg.lies_on_rev_iff_lie_son {A : P} (lieson : A LiesOn seg) : A LiesOn seg.reverse := by
-- sorry
unfold lies_on Carrier.carrier instCarrierSeg
simp only [Set.setOf_mem_eq]
rcases lieson with ⟨a,⟨h1,⟨h2,h3⟩⟩⟩
use 1-a
constructor
linarith
constructor
linarith
simp only [reverse]
rw[sub_smul,sub_eq_add_neg]
simp only [one_smul]
have h:-(a • VEC seg.target seg.source)=a • (-1) • VEC seg.target seg.source:=by
rw[smul_algebra_smul_comm]
rw[neg_smul]
simp only [Complex.real_smul, one_smul]
have h':VEC seg.target A=VEC seg.target seg.source+VEC seg.source A:=by
rw[←neg_vec seg.source seg.target,add_comm,←sub_eq_add_neg,vec_sub_vec]
rw[h]
rw[h',←neg_vec seg.source seg.target]
simp only [smul_neg, neg_smul, one_smul, neg_neg, Complex.real_smul, add_right_inj]
exact h3

theorem eq_source_iff_lies_on_ray_lies_on_ray_rev {A : P} : A = ray.source ↔ (A LiesOn ray) ∧ (A LiesOn ray.reverse) := by
-- sorry
constructor
intro h
constructor
use 0
simp only [le_refl, zero_smul, true_and]
rw[h,vec_same_eq_zero]
use 0
simp only [le_refl, Dir.toVec_neg_eq_neg_toVec, smul_neg, zero_smul, neg_zero, true_and]
simp only [Ray.reverse]
rw[h,vec_same_eq_zero]
simp only [and_imp]
rintro ⟨a,⟨anneg,h⟩⟩ ⟨b,⟨bnneg,h'⟩⟩
simp only [Ray.reverse] at h'
simp only [Dir.toVec_neg_eq_neg_toVec, smul_neg] at h'
rw[h,←add_zero a,← sub_self b,add_sub,sub_smul] at h'
simp only [sub_eq_neg_self, mul_eq_zero] at h'
have h'': a+b=0:=by
contrapose! h'
apply smul_ne_zero
exact h'
apply Dir.toVec_ne_zero
have:a=0:=by
linarith
rw[this] at h
simp only [zero_smul] at h
rw[eq_iff_vec_eq_zero,h]

theorem not_lies_on_of_lies_int_rev {A : P} (liesint : A LiesInt ray.reverse) : ¬ A LiesOn ray := by
-- sorry
by_contra h
rcases liesint with ⟨h',nsource⟩
have: A LiesOn ray.reverse:=by
apply h'
have :A=ray.source:=by
rw[eq_source_iff_lies_on_ray_lies_on_ray_rev]
constructor
exact h
exact this
trivial

theorem not_lies_int_of_lies_on_rev {A : P} (liesint : A LiesOn ray.reverse) : ¬ A LiesInt ray :=by
-- sorry
by_contra h
rw[←Ray.rev_rev_eq_self ray] at h
have:¬A LiesOn ray.reverse:=by
apply not_lies_on_of_lies_int_rev
exact h
trivial

-- `This theorem really concerns about the total order on a line`
theorem lies_on_pt_toDir_of_pt_lies_on_rev {A B : P} {ray : Ray P} (hA : A LiesOn ray) (hB : B LiesOn ray.reverse) : A LiesOn Ray.mk B ray.toDir := sorry

theorem Ray.toDir_of_reverse_eq_neg_toDir : ray.reverse.toDir = - ray.toDir := rfl

theorem Ray.toProj_of_reverse_eq_toProj : ray.reverse.toProj = ray.toProj := sorry

theorem Seg.toVec_of_reverse_eq_neg_toVec : seg.reverse.toVec = - seg.toVec := sorry

theorem Seg_nd.toVec_nd_of_reverse_eq_neg_toVec_nd : seg_nd.reverse.toVec_nd = - seg_nd.toVec_nd := sorry

theorem Seg_nd.toDir_of_reverse_eq_neg_toDir : seg_nd.reverse.toDir = - seg_nd.toDir := sorry

theorem Seg_nd.toProj_of_reverse_eq_toProj : seg_nd.reverse.toProj = seg_nd.toProj := sorry
theorem Ray.toProj_of_reverse_eq_toProj : ray.reverse.toProj = ray.toProj := by
-- sorry
--@HeRunming: Simply imitate the proof of theorem "eq_toProj_of_smul" in Vector.lean
unfold Ray.reverse
unfold Ray.toDir
unfold Ray.toProj
apply Quotient.sound
unfold HasEquiv.Equiv instHasEquiv PM.con PM
simp only [Con.rel_eq_coe, Con.rel_mk]
unfold EuclidGeom.Ray.toDir
right
rfl

theorem Seg.toVec_of_reverse_eq_neg_toVec : seg.reverse.toVec = - seg.toVec := by
-- sorry
unfold toVec reverse
simp only [reverse]
rw[neg_vec]

theorem Seg_nd.toVec_nd_of_reverse_eq_neg_toVec_nd : seg_nd.reverse.toVec_nd = - seg_nd.toVec_nd := by
-- sorry
apply Subtype.eq
apply Seg.toVec_of_reverse_eq_neg_toVec
-- simp

theorem Seg_nd.toDir_of_reverse_eq_neg_toDir : seg_nd.reverse.toDir = - seg_nd.toDir := by
-- sorry
unfold toDir
symm
have :seg_nd.reverse.toVec_nd.1=(-1)•seg_nd.toVec_nd.1:=by
rw[neg_smul,one_smul]
rw[Seg_nd.toVec_nd_of_reverse_eq_neg_toVec_nd]
rfl
apply @neg_normalize_eq_normalize_smul_neg _ _ (-1)
rw[this]
simp only [ne_eq, neg_smul, one_smul]
norm_num

theorem Seg_nd.toProj_of_reverse_eq_toProj : seg_nd.reverse.toProj = seg_nd.toProj := by
-- sorry
apply @eq_toProj_of_smul _ _ (-1)
rw[neg_smul,one_smul]
rw[Seg_nd.toVec_nd_of_reverse_eq_neg_toVec_nd]
apply neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mp
rfl

-- reversing the toDir does not change the length
theorem length_eq_length_of_rev : seg.length = seg.reverse.length := sorry
theorem length_eq_length_of_rev : seg.length = seg.reverse.length := by
-- sorry
unfold Seg.length
have h:Vec.norm seg.toVec=norm seg.toVec:=by
rfl
have h':Vec.norm seg.reverse.toVec=norm seg.reverse.toVec:=by
rfl
rw[←h,←h']
rw[Seg.toVec_of_reverse_eq_neg_toVec]
have eq: (-Seg.toVec seg)=-(Seg.toVec seg):=by
rfl
rw[eq]
simp only [Vec.norm]
norm_num

-- A point lies on the directed segment if and only if it lies on the ray associated to the segment and the ray associated to the reverse of this segment.
-- need to be refined
theorem lies_on_iff_lies_on_toRay_and_rev_toRay {A : P} : A LiesOn seg_nd.1 ↔ (A LiesOn seg_nd.toRay) ∧ (A LiesOn seg_nd.reverse.toRay) := by
-- sorry
constructor
intro liesonseg
constructor
apply Seg_nd.lies_on_toRay_of_lies_on
trivial
apply Seg_nd.lies_on_toRay_of_lies_on
apply Seg.lies_on_rev_iff_lie_son
trivial
rintro ⟨⟨a,anneg,h⟩,b,bnneg,h'⟩
unfold Dir.toVec Ray.toDir Seg_nd.toRay at h h'
rw[Seg_nd.toDir_of_reverse_eq_neg_toDir] at h'
have tria:(-Seg_nd.toDir seg_nd).1=(-1)•(Seg_nd.toDir seg_nd).1:=by
rw[Dir.toVec_neg_eq_neg_toVec _]
rw[neg_one_smul]
unfold Dir.toVec at tria
rw[tria] at h'
simp only [Seg_nd.toDir] at h h'
have trib:b • -1 • (Vec_nd.normalize (Seg_nd.toVec_nd seg_nd)).1=(-b)• (Vec_nd.normalize (Seg_nd.toVec_nd seg_nd)).1:=by
simp only [neg_smul, one_smul, smul_neg, Complex.real_smul]
unfold Dir.toVec at trib
rw[trib] at h'
set v:=(Vec_nd.normalize (Seg_nd.toVec_nd seg_nd)).1 with v_def
unfold Dir.toVec at v_def
simp only [Seg_nd.reverse,Seg.reverse] at h'
rw[←v_def] at h h'
have asumbv:(a+b)•v=VEC seg_nd.1.source seg_nd.1.target:=by
rw[← vec_add_vec _ A _,←neg_vec seg_nd.1.target A,h,h',add_smul]
simp
have tri1:VEC seg_nd.1.source seg_nd.1.target=seg_nd.toVec_nd.1:=by
rfl
rw[tri1,←Vec_nd.norm_smul_normalize_eq_self seg_nd.toVec_nd] at asumbv
have tri2:(a+b-(Vec.norm seg_nd.toVec_nd))•(seg_nd.toDir).1=0:=by
rw[sub_smul,asumbv]
simp
have asumb:a+b=(Vec.norm seg_nd.toVec_nd):=by
have asumb:a+b-(Vec.norm seg_nd.toVec_nd)=0:=by
rcases smul_eq_zero.mp tri2 with hyp1|hyp2
exact hyp1
exfalso
apply Dir.toVec_ne_zero seg_nd.toDir
assumption
linarith
have norm_pos_vec:0<Vec.norm seg_nd.toVec_nd:=by
simp only [ne_eq]
apply norm_pos_iff.mpr (seg_nd.toVec_nd.2)
have norm_nonzero:Vec.norm seg_nd.toVec_nd≠0:=by
linarith
have alenorm:a≤Vec.norm seg_nd.toVec_nd:=by
linarith
have tri3:1=Vec.norm seg_nd.toVec_nd*(Vec.norm seg_nd.toVec_nd)⁻¹:=by
rw[mul_inv_cancel norm_nonzero]
use a*(Vec.norm seg_nd.toVec_nd)⁻¹
constructor
apply mul_nonneg
exact anneg
simp only [ne_eq, inv_nonneg]
linarith
constructor
rw[tri3]
apply mul_le_mul
exact alenorm
trivial
simp only [ne_eq, inv_nonneg]
apply le_trans anneg
exact alenorm
apply le_trans anneg
exact alenorm
rw[h,mul_smul,tri1]
nth_rw 3[←Vec_nd.norm_smul_normalize_eq_self]
simp only [v_def]
rw[smul_smul,smul_smul,mul_assoc,←smul_smul]
rw[mul_comm] at tri3
rw[←tri3]
simp only [Complex.real_smul, one_smul]

end reverse

section extension

-- Define the extension ray from a nontrival segment
def Seg_nd.extension : Ray P := (seg_nd.reverse.toRay).reverse

theorem extn_eq_rev_toray_rev : seg_nd.extension = seg_nd.reverse.toRay.reverse := sorry

theorem eq_target_iff_lies_on_lies_on_extn {A : P} : (A LiesOn seg_nd.1) ∧ (A LiesOn seg_nd.extension) ↔ A = seg_nd.1.target := sorry

theorem target_lies_int_seg_source_pt_of_pt_lies_int_extn {A : P} (liesint : A LiesInt seg_nd.extension) : seg_nd.1.target LiesInt SEG seg_nd.1.source A := sorry

theorem extn_eq_rev_toray_rev : seg_nd.extension = seg_nd.reverse.toRay.reverse :=by
-- sorry
--@HeRunming
rfl

theorem eq_target_iff_lies_on_lies_on_extn {A : P} : (A LiesOn seg_nd.1) ∧ (A LiesOn seg_nd.extension) ↔ A = seg_nd.1.target := by
-- sorry
constructor
rintro ⟨hyp1,hyp2⟩
have h:seg_nd.1.target=seg_nd.extension.source :=by rfl
rw[h]
apply (eq_source_iff_lies_on_ray_lies_on_ray_rev seg_nd.extension).mpr
constructor
exact hyp2
have h':seg_nd.reverse.toRay=seg_nd.extension.reverse:=by
unfold Ray.reverse Seg_nd.toRay Ray.source Seg.source Seg_nd.reverse Seg.reverse
simp only [Seg_nd.extension,Ray.reverse]
unfold Ray.source Seg_nd.reverse Seg.reverse Ray.toDir Seg_nd.toRay
simp only [neg_neg]
rw[←h']
apply Seg_nd.lies_on_toRay_of_lies_on
apply Seg.lies_on_rev_iff_lie_son
apply hyp1
intro hyp
constructor
use 1
simp only [zero_le_one, le_refl, one_smul, true_and]
rw[hyp]
use 0
simp only [le_refl, Dir.toVec_neg_eq_neg_toVec, smul_neg, zero_smul, neg_zero, true_and]
rw[hyp]
have :(Seg_nd.extension seg_nd).source=seg_nd.1.target:=by
rfl
rw[this]
simp only [vec_same_eq_zero]

theorem target_lies_int_seg_source_pt_of_pt_lies_int_extn {A : P} (liesint : A LiesInt seg_nd.extension) : seg_nd.1.target LiesInt SEG seg_nd.1.source A :=
by
-- sorry
rcases liesint with ⟨⟨a,anonneg,ha⟩,nonsource⟩
have raysourcesegtarget:seg_nd.1.target=seg_nd.extension.1:=by
rfl
have sourcetargetA:VEC seg_nd.1.source seg_nd.1.target+VEC seg_nd.1.target A=VEC seg_nd.1.source A:=by
rw[vec_add_vec]
have vec_ndtovec:VEC seg_nd.1.source seg_nd.1.target=seg_nd.toVec_nd.1:=by
rfl
have apos:0<a:=by
contrapose! nonsource
have:a=0:=by linarith
rw[this] at ha
simp only [Dir.toVec_neg_eq_neg_toVec, smul_neg, zero_smul, neg_zero] at ha
apply (eq_iff_vec_eq_zero _ _).mpr
exact ha
have raysourcesource:seg_nd.extension.source=seg_nd.1.target:=by
rfl
have seg_pos:0< Vec_nd.norm (Seg_nd.toVec_nd seg_nd):=by
simp only [ne_eq, norm_of_Vec_nd_eq_norm_of_Vec_nd_fst,Vec.norm]
apply norm_pos_iff.mpr (seg_nd.toVec_nd.2)
have seg_nonzero:Vec_nd.norm (Seg_nd.toVec_nd seg_nd)≠0:=by linarith
have aseg_pos:0<Vec_nd.norm (Seg_nd.toVec_nd seg_nd)+a:=by
linarith
have aseg_nonzero:Vec_nd.norm (Seg_nd.toVec_nd seg_nd)+a≠ 0:=by
linarith
have raydir:seg_nd.extension.toDir.toVec=seg_nd.toVec_nd.normalize.toVec:=by
rw[Ray.toDir_of_reverse_eq_neg_toDir,←Seg_nd.toDir_eq_toRay_toDir,Seg_nd.toDir_of_reverse_eq_neg_toDir]
simp only [neg_neg]
have segleaseg:Vec_nd.norm (Seg_nd.toVec_nd seg_nd)≤Vec_nd.norm (Seg_nd.toVec_nd seg_nd)+a:=by
linarith
constructor
use (seg_nd.toVec_nd.norm)*(seg_nd.toVec_nd.norm+a)⁻¹
constructor
apply mul_nonneg
linarith[seg_pos]
norm_num
rw[←norm_of_Vec_nd_eq_norm_of_Vec_nd_fst]
linarith
constructor
rw[←mul_inv_cancel aseg_nonzero]
apply mul_le_mul
linarith
linarith
norm_num
rw[← norm_of_Vec_nd_eq_norm_of_Vec_nd_fst]
linarith
linarith
simp only [Seg.target]
rw[←raysourcesegtarget] at ha
rw[←sourcetargetA,ha,vec_ndtovec,←Vec_nd.norm_smul_normalize_eq_self (seg_nd.toVec_nd),←norm_of_Vec_nd_eq_norm_of_Vec_nd_fst,raydir]
rw[←add_smul,← mul_smul,mul_assoc,inv_mul_cancel,mul_one]
linarith
constructor
exact seg_nd.2
rw[←raysourcesegtarget] at nonsource
symm
exact nonsource
end extension

end EuclidGeom

0 comments on commit fd01b0a

Please sign in to comment.