-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
From Line #131
From Line #131
Conversation
quizas211
commented
Oct 21, 2023
- Unified variable names & brackets
- Added some semi-trivial theorems in Line
- Added a theorem that still needs to be proved in Ray
- Added two theorems that still need to be proved in Colinear
- My local files can be compiled successfully
… 3. Added a theorem that still needs to be proved in Ray 3. Added a theorem that still needs to be proved in Colinear
… in Line 3. Added a theorem that still needs to be proved in Ray 3. Added a theorem that still needs to be proved in Colinear" This reverts commit 851516c.
…theorems in Line 3. Added a theorem that still needs to be proved in Ray 3. Added a theorem that still needs to be proved in Colinear"" This reverts commit ff67bab.
@@ -9,15 +9,22 @@ section setoid | |||
|
|||
variable {P : Type _} [EuclideanPlane P] | |||
|
|||
def same_extn_line : Ray P → Ray P → Prop := fun r₁ r₂ => r₁.toProj = r₂.toProj ∧ (r₂.source LiesOn r₁ ∨ r₂.source LiesOn r₁.reverse) | |||
def same_extn_line : Ray P → Ray P → Prop := fun r r' => r.toProj = r'.toProj ∧ (r'.source LiesOn r ∨ r'.source LiesOn r.reverse) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your effort in making variables uniform!
|
||
theorem pt_pt_lies_on_iff_seg_toLine {A B : P}{l : Line P}(h : B ≠ A) : A LiesOn l ∧ B LiesOn l ↔ (Seg_nd.mk A B h).toLine = l := by | ||
constructor | ||
· sorry |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still a sorry here to be filled
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I was way too spleepy yesterday.
theorem maximal (l : Line P) {A B : P} (h₁ : A ∈ l.carrier) (h₂ : B ∈ l.carrier) (h : B ≠ A) : (∀ (C : P), colinear A B C → (C ∈ l.carrier)) := sorry | ||
theorem maximal' {l : Line P} {A B : P} (h₁ : A LiesOn l) (h₂ : B LiesOn l) (h : B ≠ A) : (∀ (C : P), colinear A B C → (C LiesOn l)) := by | ||
intro C Co | ||
sorry |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this theorem can be reforulate even better. we can move C,colinear A B C into hypothesis.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This theorem was written by otheres. So our team didn't make changes.