Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

From Line #131

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Oct 21, 2023
Merged

From Line #131

merged 13 commits into from
Oct 21, 2023

Conversation

quizas211
Copy link
Collaborator

  1. Unified variable names & brackets
  2. Added some semi-trivial theorems in Line
  3. Added a theorem that still needs to be proved in Ray
  4. Added two theorems that still need to be proved in Colinear
  5. My local files can be compiled successfully

quizas211 and others added 13 commits September 20, 2023 16:33
… 3. Added a theorem that still needs to be proved in Ray 3. Added a theorem that still needs to be proved in Colinear
… in Line 3. Added a theorem that still needs to be proved in Ray 3. Added a theorem that still needs to be proved in Colinear"

This reverts commit 851516c.
…theorems in Line 3. Added a theorem that still needs to be proved in Ray 3. Added a theorem that still needs to be proved in Colinear""

This reverts commit ff67bab.
@@ -9,15 +9,22 @@ section setoid

variable {P : Type _} [EuclideanPlane P]

def same_extn_line : Ray P → Ray P → Prop := fun r₁ r₂ => r.toProj = r.toProj ∧ (r.source LiesOn r ∨ r.source LiesOn r.reverse)
def same_extn_line : Ray P → Ray P → Prop := fun r r' => r.toProj = r'.toProj ∧ (r'.source LiesOn r ∨ r'.source LiesOn r.reverse)
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your effort in making variables uniform!


theorem pt_pt_lies_on_iff_seg_toLine {A B : P}{l : Line P}(h : B ≠ A) : A LiesOn l ∧ B LiesOn l ↔ (Seg_nd.mk A B h).toLine = l := by
constructor
· sorry
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still a sorry here to be filled

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I was way too spleepy yesterday.

theorem maximal (l : Line P) {A B : P} (h₁ : A ∈ l.carrier) (h₂ : B ∈ l.carrier) (h : B ≠ A) : (∀ (C : P), colinear A B C → (C ∈ l.carrier)) := sorry
theorem maximal' {l : Line P} {A B : P} (h₁ : A LiesOn l) (h₂ : B LiesOn l) (h : B ≠ A) : (∀ (C : P), colinear A B C → (C LiesOn l)) := by
intro C Co
sorry
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this theorem can be reforulate even better. we can move C,colinear A B C into hypothesis.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This theorem was written by otheres. So our team didn't make changes.

@jjdishere jjdishere merged commit c408087 into jjdishere:master Oct 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants