You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When running plot_tree and displaying taxa (OTU) names, if an OTU has a zero value, the OTU name doesn't display.
See example with 9 samples:
Only those with 9 circles have the taxa_names.
I'm not certain if those are exactly zero values, or just very low. Since the Abundance scale as a small circle when the count=1, I assume those without circles are zeroes.
> R.version
_
platform x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0
arch x86_64
os darwin13.4.0
system x86_64, darwin13.4.0
status
major 3
minor 2.0
year 2015
month 04
day 16
svn rev 68180
language R
version.string R version 3.2.0 (2015-04-16)
nickname Full of Ingredients
> packageVersion("phyloseq")
[1] ‘1.13.2’
> packageVersion("ggplot2")
[1] ‘1.0.1’
Jeff
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the careful problem description, Jeff. My first impression is that this is indeed a minor bug. I can't think of the explanation off the top of my head, but I'll tag this for a fix and keep this open until it is solved.
Hi Joey,
about the name list not correctly shown in the "justified" image, I acted directly on the 0 values in the .biom matrix.
I simply replace the 0 otu values with 1. Even though the little spots will correspond to 1, it is easy to discriminate between them and the bigger values.
What do you think about?
Thanks!
When running plot_tree and displaying taxa (OTU) names, if an OTU has a zero value, the OTU name doesn't display.
See example with 9 samples:
Only those with 9 circles have the taxa_names.
I'm not certain if those are exactly zero values, or just very low. Since the Abundance scale as a small circle when the count=1, I assume those without circles are zeroes.
Jeff
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: