Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[5.3] Removing calls to legacy ->set() #44011

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 5, 2024

Conversation

Hackwar
Copy link
Member

@Hackwar Hackwar commented Sep 2, 2024

Summary of Changes

This PR removes a series of calls to LegacyPropertyManagement::set() where easily possible. The method is deprecated.

Testing Instructions

Codereview and testing numerous changes. There should be no change.

Link to documentations

Please select:

  • Documentation link for docs.joomla.org:

  • No documentation changes for docs.joomla.org needed

  • Pull Request link for manual.joomla.org:

  • No documentation changes for manual.joomla.org needed

@Hackwar Hackwar force-pushed the 5.3-legacyproperty-set1 branch from 7261997 to 3e224b7 Compare September 5, 2024 19:55
Copy link
Contributor

@rdeutz rdeutz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we remove the use statement?

@Hackwar
Copy link
Member Author

Hackwar commented Sep 27, 2024

No, since that would change the interface of the respective object and be a b/c break.

@laoneo laoneo self-assigned this Oct 4, 2024
@laoneo
Copy link
Member

laoneo commented Oct 4, 2024

Can you fix the conflicts here?

@Hackwar
Copy link
Member Author

Hackwar commented Oct 4, 2024

done.

@laoneo laoneo merged commit 6ab1ee9 into joomla:5.3-dev Oct 5, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
@laoneo
Copy link
Member

laoneo commented Oct 5, 2024

Thanks!

@laoneo laoneo added this to the Joomla! 5.3.0 milestone Oct 5, 2024
@Hackwar Hackwar deleted the 5.3-legacyproperty-set1 branch October 6, 2024 18:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants