Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 18, 2024. It is now read-only.

Added Default for Utf8Array #1169

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 20, 2022
Merged

Conversation

ritchie46
Copy link
Collaborator

Improves ergonomics when using std::mem::take.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 19, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1169 (3a63129) into main (3fdb33f) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1169      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.73%   83.70%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         365      365              
  Lines       35847    35873      +26     
==========================================
+ Hits        30018    30028      +10     
- Misses       5829     5845      +16     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/array/utf8/mod.rs 83.64% <0.00%> (-2.94%) ⬇️
src/io/ipc/read/array/boolean.rs 90.74% <0.00%> (-7.41%) ⬇️
src/io/parquet/read/deserialize/simple.rs 82.83% <0.00%> (-0.97%) ⬇️
src/array/utf8/mutable.rs 89.77% <0.00%> (-0.76%) ⬇️
src/io/parquet/read/deserialize/mod.rs 85.81% <0.00%> (-0.10%) ⬇️
src/io/ipc/read/reader.rs 96.32% <0.00%> (+0.33%) ⬆️
src/io/ipc/read/file_async.rs 61.19% <0.00%> (+0.74%) ⬆️
src/array/binary/mod.rs 90.12% <0.00%> (+1.23%) ⬆️
src/io/ipc/read/stream_async.rs 76.71% <0.00%> (+1.36%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3fdb33f...3a63129. Read the comment docs.

ritchie46 and others added 2 commits July 19, 2022 22:02
Co-authored-by: Jorge Leitao <jorgecarleitao@gmail.com>
@jorgecarleitao jorgecarleitao merged commit dc77578 into jorgecarleitao:main Jul 20, 2022
@jorgecarleitao jorgecarleitao changed the title implement Default for Utf8Array Added Default for Utf8Array Jul 20, 2022
@jorgecarleitao jorgecarleitao added the enhancement An improvement to an existing feature label Jul 20, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement An improvement to an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants