-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 687
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Decode with PyJWK #886
Merged
Merged
Decode with PyJWK #886
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
39d3344
Add `algorithm` property to `PyJWK`
luhn 2fdeaa6
Allow `PyJWK` as a key when decoding JWTs.
luhn ac7db73
Use PyJWK algorithm by default when deocding JWTs.
luhn a4d6b3b
[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
pre-commit-ci[bot] 05749d1
Rename `PyJWK.algorithm` to `PyJWK.algorithm_name`
luhn 745dd47
Test `PyJWK.algorithm_name`
luhn 3a27cea
Test decode with PyJWK object.
luhn e9ecde3
Test implicit algorithm with PyJWK.
luhn 930ce80
[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
pre-commit-ci[bot] bb057c1
Flake8 fix.
luhn 1d16024
Refactor to fix a mypy error.
luhn 872dcf6
Merge branch 'jpadilla:master' into decode-with-jwk
luhn 1909433
Update sample usage.
luhn 4e6a7be
Fix test.
luhn File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Imo having both
self.algorithm
andself.Algorithm
may be too similarThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Understandable. Any suggestions?
self.algorithm_name
?self.alg
? (To match the JWK field)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
self.algorithm_name
seems alright, actually I thinkself.Algorithm
is the one being wrong, andself.algorithm_class
or something similar might be better. Anyway better not breaking any public attributeThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will do.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm +1 on @Viicos's suggestion.