Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add PRR review and update status to be implementable. #4

Merged

Conversation

cici37
Copy link

@cici37 cici37 commented Sep 1, 2021

Add PRR review and update status to be implementable.

Update status to be implementable.
@jpbetz jpbetz merged commit c7e0896 into jpbetz:crd-expression-lang-kep Sep 1, 2021
jpbetz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2021
jpbetz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2022
jpbetz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2023
…ategy (kubernetes#3661)

* Initial KEP for improving pruning in kubectl apply

* Add design details

Co-authored-by: Katrina Verey <katrina.verey@shopify.com>

* Add another open question

* Links, clarifications, ownerRef and GKNN explanations

* Follow-on to initial feedback, address some unresolved blocks

* Fix lint errors

* Add more detail about reference implementation (#2)

* Apply prune jan25 (#3)

* More clearly delineate specification vs kubectl details

* Move design details of spec to Design Details section

* Updates from synchronous conversation

* Remove leftover paragraph (#5)

Not an alternative rejected any more, given applyset.k8s.io/inventory

* Justin has always been coauthor

* KEP-3659: production readiness etc (#4)

Fill in the testing/ PRR sections.

* Fix test failures

* Prune: document confused deputy attack and mitigations

Likely pushes us to GKNN-derived IDs.

* Constrain applyset id

We just choose the constrained applyset id to prevent "applyset ID
impersonation".

* Update KEP and PRR metadata

* Enhance testing description

* ID vs name fixes

* Fixes from soltysh's review

---------

Co-authored-by: Justin Santa Barbara <justinsb@google.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants