James/duckdb support #30
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jpmmcneill
force-pushed
the
james/duckdb-support
branch
from
8213312 to
233d365
Compare
jpmmcneill
force-pushed
the
james/duckdb-support
branch
from
233d365 to
d471b94
Compare
jpmmcneill
force-pushed
the
james/duckdb-support
branch
from
3483bd3 to
c223853
Compare
jpmmcneill
force-pushed
the
james/duckdb-support
branch
from
6986575 to
f63ce71
Compare
jpmmcneill
force-pushed
the
james/duckdb-support
branch
from
7e7ebdb to
7b92920
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
solves #25
solves #28
at the moment this is blocked as duckdb doesn't support unions in recursive ctes (possibly this needs to be handled better in dbt-graph-theory code)