Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
The ARC shrinker callback `arc_shrinker_count/_scan()` is invoked by the kernel's shrinker mechanism when the system is running low on free pages. This happens via 2 code paths: 1. "direct reclaim": The system is attempting to allocate a page, but we are low on memory. The ARC shrinker callback is invoked from the page-allocation code path. 2. "indirect reclaim": kswapd notices that there aren't many free pages, so it invokes the ARC shrinker callback. In both cases, the kernel's shrinker code requests that the ARC shrinker callback release some of its cache, and then it measures how many pages were released. However, it's measurement of released pages does not include pages that are freed via `__free_pages()`, which is how the ARC releases memory (via `abd_free_chunks()`). Rather, the kernel shrinker code is looking for pages to be placed on the lists of reclaimable pages (which is separate from actually-free pages). Because the kernel shrinker code doesn't detect that the ARC has released pages, it may call the ARC shrinker callback many times, resulting in the ARC "collapsing" down to `arc_c_min`. This has several negative impacts: 1. ZFS doesn't use RAM to cache data effectively. 2. In the direct reclaim case, a single page allocation may wait a long time (e.g. more than a minute) while we evict the entire ARC. 3. Even with the improvements made in 67c0f0d ("ARC shrinking blocks reads/writes"), occasionally `arc_size` may stay above `arc_c` for the entire time of the ARC collapse, thus blocking ZFS read/write operations in `arc_get_data_impl()`. To address these issues, this commit limits the ways that the ARC shrinker callback can be used by the kernel shrinker code, and mitigates the impact of arc_is_overflowing() on ZFS read/write operations. With this commit: 1. We limit the amount of data that can be reclaimed from the ARC via the "direct reclaim" shrinker. This limits the amount of time it takes to allocate a single page. 2. We do not allow the ARC to shrink via kswapd (indirect reclaim). Instead we rely on `arc_evict_zthr` to monitor free memory and reduce the ARC target size to keep sufficient free memory in the system. Note that we can't simply rely on limiting the amount that we reclaim at once (as for the direct reclaim case), because kswapd's "boosted" logic can invoke the callback an unlimited number of times (see `balance_pgdat()`). 3. When `arc_is_overflowing()` and we want to allocate memory, `arc_get_data_impl()` will wait only for a multiple of the requested amount of data to be evicted, rather than waiting for the ARC to no longer be overflowing. This allows ZFS reads/writes to make progress even while the ARC is overflowing, while also ensuring that the eviction thread makes progress towards reducing the total amount of memory used by the ARC. 4. The amount of memory that the ARC always tries to keep free for the rest of the system, `arc_sys_free` is increased. 5. Now that the shrinker callback is able to provide feedback to the kernel's shrinker code about our progress, we can safely enable the kswapd hook. This will allow the arc to receive notifications when memory pressure is first detected by the kernel. We also re-enable the appropriate kstats to track these callbacks. Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <ryan@iXsystems.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> Co-authored-by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com> Closes openzfs#10600
- Loading branch information
