Skip to content

Open Community Working Meeting 2022-04-01 #164

Closed
@Relequestual

Description

@Relequestual

📺 See Recording

Go To Previous Meeting

Agenda

Topic Owner Decision/NextSteps
Review last call's action items @Relequestual The action items were reviewed
Update to Code of Conduct @Relequestual The updated CoC can be read @ PR #5
Add note (CREF) about ambiguous behaviour of additionalProperties when invalid @Relequestual The note on the topic can be read @ Issue #1172
Add note (CREF) about ambiguous behaviour of additionalProperties @Releuestual The PR can be read @ PR #1203

Highlights

  • Members shared comments on ambiguous behavior of additionalProperties

  • Organizational matters concerning processes, licensing, finances etc.

  • Members shared, clarified and discussed updates to Code of Conduct

  • Brief discussion on usage of logos and licensing

Actions

  • Add note (CREF) to ambiguous behaviour additionalProperties See here

  • Calender Events with Slack

Attendees

Account
@Relequestual
@jviotti
@jdesrosiers

Details

Ambiguous behaviour of additionalProperties

The complete discussion can be followed by reading the following:

Org Discussion #57

Spec Issue #1172

Spec Pull Request #1203


Updates to Code of Conduct1

Members discussed the modifications made to contributor covenant code of conduct and further clarified that the working group takes IETF BCP542 as a guide only. i.e guidelines for conduct based on discussions with OpenJS foundation. In light of those changes, escalation is now clearly defined and provides contact emails.

In brief, BCP542 acts as a guide to how the working group conducts itself and engages with each other particularly in cases of escalation and reporting. i.e as an organizational guide.

Whereas the covenant code of conduct has to do with how to be nice, deal with biases, fair treatment etc i.e as a community guide.

Read OpenJS Code of Conduct

Read JSON Schema Code of Conduct

Org Issue #163

Org Issue #129


JSON Logo

Members discussed fair usage of logo and respective licensing. The conclusion being, there are differences in usage allowed by trademark owner for products that are in incubation phase and the one already established.


Footnotes

  1. https://github.com/json-schema-org/.github/pull/5

  2. https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp54 2

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions