Skip to content

Vocabulary definitions need not be formal or published depending on usage. #1103

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions jsonschema-core.xml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -399,6 +399,13 @@
of any vocabulary, there is no analogous mechanism to indicate individual
keyword usage.
</t>
<t>
A schema vocabulary can be defined by anything from an informal description
to a standards proposal, depending on the audience and interoperability
expectations. In particular, in order to facilitate vocabulary use within
non-public organizations, a vocabulary specification need not be published
outside of its scope of use.
</t>
</section>
<section title="Meta-Schemas">
<t>
Expand Down