You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Before I get into my issue, I just want to say (again), thanks for all your efforts on this package. I've found it much easier to use than many of the other similar python libraries.
I'm using v0.5.28. I'm faced with a scenario where I would like to specify different tolerances for the x and y directions when it comes to 'snapping' parallel lines into one.
I see the exact same request had been made some years ago, and it looks as it had been accepted and implemented back then into the v0.6 branch, but hasn't made its way into the master one.
Do you have plans to include this into the master branch? If not, can you suggest any workarounds for how I could get this to work?
Thanks and kind regards,
Ratul
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I haven't investigated a solution yet, but I have seen that this feature has been previously requested, and is in fact part of the v0.6 alpha branch.
I have not yet looked deeply into the architecture of the v0.6 branch and its differences with the stable branch, but would it be possible to include this feature that is already in that branch, and merge it into the stable branch? Please refer to PR #51.
Hi Jeremy
Before I get into my issue, I just want to say (again), thanks for all your efforts on this package. I've found it much easier to use than many of the other similar python libraries.
I'm using v0.5.28. I'm faced with a scenario where I would like to specify different tolerances for the x and y directions when it comes to 'snapping' parallel lines into one.
I see the exact same request had been made some years ago, and it looks as it had been accepted and implemented back then into the v0.6 branch, but hasn't made its way into the master one.
Do you have plans to include this into the master branch? If not, can you suggest any workarounds for how I could get this to work?
Thanks and kind regards,
Ratul
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: