Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Docs] scope: replace duplicate scope word #799

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 13, 2021
Merged

[Docs] scope: replace duplicate scope word #799

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 13, 2021

Conversation

rafaelss95
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 13, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #799 (ecf7a27) into master (952af25) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #799   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.24%   99.24%           
=======================================
  Files          98       98           
  Lines        1453     1453           
  Branches      477      477           
=======================================
  Hits         1442     1442           
  Misses         11       11           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 952af25...ecf7a27. Read the comment docs.

@ljharb ljharb merged commit ecf7a27 into jsx-eslint:master Jul 13, 2021
@ljharb ljharb changed the title docs: [scope] replace duplicate scope word [Docs] scope: replace duplicate scope word Jul 13, 2021
@ljharb ljharb changed the title [Docs] scope: replace duplicate scope word [Docs] scope: replace duplicate scope word Jul 13, 2021
@rafaelss95 rafaelss95 deleted the patch-1 branch July 13, 2021 23:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants