-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Application.local_refresh method signature #1114
Conversation
c657340
to
c984a83
Compare
squashed and rebased to pass commit lint |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, thanks. You might need to (re?)sign your commits to merge.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, could you include the integration test steps in the PR description? Either just which of the pylibjuju integration tests were run, or if local refresh is not used in there, just a code snippet that tests the functionality .
172f9ea
to
ac96d6c
Compare
7b1650e
to
305b41a
Compare
305b41a
to
be8b2cb
Compare
/merge |
Fixes #1100
Closes #881
Charmers already pass a Path to refresh() in integration tests.
This PR standardises that.
Making arguments to local_refresh() explicit, as charmer don't get the default values.
Existing integration test is updated.
Jira: https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/CHARMTECH-309