Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test quadratic code on Travis... #227

Closed
IainNZ opened this issue Jul 18, 2014 · 11 comments
Closed

Test quadratic code on Travis... #227

IainNZ opened this issue Jul 18, 2014 · 11 comments
Milestone

Comments

@IainNZ
Copy link
Collaborator

IainNZ commented Jul 18, 2014

... by implementing a QCQP MPB interface to Ipopt, probably.

@joehuchette joehuchette added this to the 0.6 milestone Aug 15, 2014
@joehuchette
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging as 0.6, I think this should be a (fairly) high priority.

@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented Aug 15, 2014

Agreed. This includes quadratic MPS writer.

@IainNZ IainNZ changed the title [Testing] Test quadratic code on Travis... Test quadratic code on Travis... Sep 2, 2014
@IainNZ IainNZ modified the milestones: 0.7, 0.6 Sep 2, 2014
@IainNZ IainNZ added the QCQP label Sep 19, 2014
@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented Nov 17, 2014

Ipopt now supports QP (but not QCQP).

@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented Dec 11, 2014

I'm wondering how crazy it would be to translate quadratic SOC constraints x'x <= t^2 to the convex form x'x/t - t<= 0 before giving them to ipopt.

@joehuchette
Copy link
Contributor

How well would Ipopt handle the case where t is very small (or zero)?

@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented Dec 11, 2014

Not well at all.

@joehuchette
Copy link
Contributor

Well enough for testing, if we choose problems carefully?

@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented Dec 11, 2014

If we implement it, it'll probably have to be a solver option. Anyway we can probably get the tests to pass even if we give Ipopt the nonconvex form.

mlubin added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2014
@mlubin mlubin removed this from the 0.7 milestone Dec 18, 2014
@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented Dec 18, 2014

We still need tests for the quadratic MPS writer, but untagging for 0.7.

@joehuchette
Copy link
Contributor

Is this done yet? What's the status of the quadratic MPS writer?

@joehuchette joehuchette added this to the 0.10 milestone Jun 30, 2015
@mlubin
Copy link
Member

mlubin commented Jun 30, 2015

Still untested
On Jun 30, 2015 12:14 PM, "Joey Huchette" notifications@github.com wrote:

Is this done yet? What's the status of the quadratic MPS writer?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#227 (comment).

@mlubin mlubin closed this as completed in 4848950 Jul 30, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants