Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf: component names use the same letter case #4519

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

fit2bot
Copy link
Contributor

@fit2bot fit2bot commented Dec 17, 2024

perf: component names use the same letter case

@fit2bot fit2bot requested a review from a team December 17, 2024 08:20
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ export default {
kael: 'Kael',
video_worker: 'Video-Worker',
panda: 'Panda',
nec: 'NEC',
nec: 'Nec',
facelive: 'Facelive'
}
return nameMapper[this.componentMetric.type]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The given code appears to be from an Angular component file and shows a mapping of various components' names to types. No major inconsistencies or errors can immediately be detected but there might be some unnecessary repetition like naming celery instead of Celery, as it's already used elsewhere in this component.

In terms of optimization, you should ensure that the data consistency throughout is maintained across all versions which could potentially improve performance if reused frequently without re-mapping each time. Also, consider using Object.keys() for loop at start to make sure order is preserved during iteration. This will significantly enhance readability and performance especially when dealing with complex mappings where keys may change due to different versioning strategies.

@LeeEirc LeeEirc merged commit 3e3f80c into dev Dec 17, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@LeeEirc LeeEirc deleted the pr@dev@perf_component_name branch December 17, 2024 08:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants