Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

📦 Migrate to ESM only packages #417

Merged
merged 39 commits into from
Jun 9, 2023
Merged

📦 Migrate to ESM only packages #417

merged 39 commits into from
Jun 9, 2023

Conversation

rowanc1
Copy link
Member

@rowanc1 rowanc1 commented Jun 9, 2023

We are migrating to ESM Only packages, which is the norm adopted by a lot of packages recently. There is a good writeup here:

https://gist.github.com/sindresorhus/a39789f98801d908bbc7ff3ecc99d99c

This also means moving to vitest over jest. As a plus, the CI is 4x faster. 🚀

See also:
https://github.com/orgs/executablebooks/discussions/981

@rowanc1 rowanc1 merged commit 1a2cb3a into main Jun 9, 2023
@rowanc1 rowanc1 deleted the feat/esm branch June 9, 2023 20:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant