Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Start to make changelog for ipywidgets 8 more friendly to users #3528

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 3, 2022

Conversation

jasongrout
Copy link
Member

This starts to make the changelog more prose instead of just bullet points.

@jasongrout jasongrout added this to the 8.0 milestone Jul 20, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

Binder 👈 Launch a binder notebook on branch jasongrout/ipywidgets/chlog8

@jasongrout
Copy link
Member Author

@ibdafna - any suggestions for this changelog? You did the highlights tour for the tutorial.

@ibdafna
Copy link
Member

ibdafna commented Jul 21, 2022

@jasongrout I glanced over it and it seems to cover everything I can think of. It's probably a good start!

@jasongrout jasongrout marked this pull request as ready for review July 26, 2022 16:54
@vidartf
Copy link
Member

vidartf commented Jul 26, 2022

Let's also have the changelog link to the spec diff for those that are interested: #3455

@vidartf
Copy link
Member

vidartf commented Jul 28, 2022

Closes #3455.

jasongrout and others added 5 commits August 2, 2022 22:38
…ommits in ipywidgets 8.

It appears that the previous date came from looking at `git merge-base master 7.x`, but there have been several merges from 7.x to master, so it's more appropriate to look at the first commits of `git log 7.x...master`. I picked a date where commits seemed to be increasing in that list as the start date of the 8.x development. It's not perfect, and the Github api doesn't allow us to just look at commits in a specific git range, but I suppose it's better than nothing.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants