Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Link to the rocker/binder image as an alternative #2065

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 21, 2023

Conversation

yuvipanda
Copy link
Contributor

Describe your changes

Link to the rocker/binder image
as a potential alternative, maintained by the R focused rocker-project.

I think of the rocker project as the R equivalent of jupyter/docker-stacks (they maintain
many images in that field!) and it would be good to crosslink.

Checklist (especially for first-time contributors)

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests
  • I will try not to use force-push to make the review process easier for reviewers
  • I have updated the documentation for significant changes

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@mathbunnyru mathbunnyru merged commit 1494233 into jupyter:main Dec 21, 2023
4 checks passed
yuvipanda added a commit to yuvipanda/rocker-website that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2024
rocker/binder contains some Jupyter things, but the rocker project
as a whole is not focused on Jupyter. This links them out to the
jupyter/docker-stacks project, which is more Jupyter focused to
serve users who are looking for more Jupyter focused container images.
I think a lot of communities / users use a combination of Python (from
various sources) and R (from the rocker project) already anyway.

I link to the rocker project from jupyter/docker-stacks since
last month (jupyter/docker-stacks#2065),
and one of the maintainers asked if I could provide a link
back as well.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants