Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pod.status.start_time can be None #633

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2018

Conversation

minrk
Copy link
Member

@minrk minrk commented Apr 3, 2018

if the pod hasn’t started yet

closes jupyterhub/binderhub#510

if the pod hasn’t started yet
@consideRatio
Copy link
Member

@minrk this looks good to me, and I'm very confident that this not cause issues if I'd press merge so here goes!

My internal voice:

  • Hmmm how many should review a PR before it is merged?
  • I figure it depends, in this case, perhaps only one quick look by someone else?

@consideRatio consideRatio merged commit f9c594b into jupyterhub:master Apr 3, 2018
@betatim
Copy link
Member

betatim commented Apr 3, 2018

How many should review a PR?

I think if you aren't sure you can comment that it looks good to you and invite someone else to take a look as well. Otherwise mostly one person seems to be enough for small things. For bigger things maybe give people time to look at it and comment.

@consideRatio
Copy link
Member

@betatim sounds great! Thank you for giving me input on this!

@minrk minrk deleted the no-start-time branch April 4, 2018 13:31
@manics manics mentioned this pull request Aug 15, 2018
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Pod culler needs to be more robust
3 participants