pinctrl: sunxi: sun7i: fix bad irq assignments on PIO I port #3
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Linux 4.2-rc2
…-watchdog-4.3' into ibs-for-mfd-merged
Constify the ACPI device ID array, it doesn't need to be writable at runtime. Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
The function arizona_irq_thread (the threaded handler for the arizona IRQs) calls pm_runtime_get_sync at the start to ensure that the chip is active as we handle the IRQ. If the chip is part way through a runtime suspend when an IRQ arrives the PM core will wait for the suspend to complete, before resuming. However, since commit 4f02164 ("mfd: arizona: Add better support for system suspend") the runtime suspend function may call disable_irq, if the chip is going to fully power off, which will try to wait for any outstanding IRQs to complete. This results in deadlock as the IRQ thread is waiting for the PM operation to complete and the PM thread is waiting for the IRQ to complete. To avoid this situation we use disable_irq_nosync, which allows the suspending thread to finish the suspend without waiting for the IRQ to complete. This is safe because if an IRQ is being processed it can only be blocked at the pm_runtime_get_sync at the start of the handler otherwise it wouldn't be possible to suspend. Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Device tree and ACPI primarily deal with unsigned ints, many of the pdata members in the Arizona driver are signed ints but are only ever assigned positive values. Changing these pdata fields to unsigned ints avoids us having to choose between overly verbose code and Sparse warnings. Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
The ChromeOS EC SPI transport driver has a dependency on OF because it uses some OF helpers from the <linux/of.h> header. But there isn't a need for an explicit dependency since the header has stub functions if CONFIG_OF is not defined. Also, MFD_CROS_EC_SPI already depends on MFD_CROS_EC which in turn has a dependency on OF so in practice can't be selected without CONFIG_OF. Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Instead of hard coding the shift for bit definition, use BIT() macro. Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
The latest valid register is TPS6586X_VERSIONCRC. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
o Making pdata NULL check to (!pdata) as coding standard and all other checks in file. o Removing redundant check of pdata, because we already check for pdata, and also derefernced before this check. Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Add MFD core driver support for DA9062 Signed-off-by: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Add device Tree Bindings for the DA9062 driver Signed-off-by: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
The regmap register definitions have been a source of many small fixes as issues are discovered. As such I made a small automated tool to check these definitions. This patch fixes the issues (mostly harmless) located by that tool, the issues fall into three catagories: 1) Volatile registers that have a default in the defaults table (default has been removed from the table since it is redundant) 2) Registers that are marked as volatile but unreadable (register has been removed from the volatile list since it is obviously not being used) 3) Registers that arn't readable but have an entry in the defaults table (again removed since it is redundant) 4) Readable non-volatile registers that are missing a default, these are dangerous as they won't get synced during a cache sync. Fortunately, most of them seem to be registers that shouldn't be there (for example wm5102 had readable registers for DRC2 and ISRC3 which is doesn't have) Hopefully another tool will be produced to check the actual default values themselves but that is outside the scope of this patch. Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
These reg_default tables are not modified after initialized, so make them const. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
i2c_driver does not need to set an owner because i2c_register_driver() will set it. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Qualcomm Debug Subsystem clock is used by CoreSight components. Add required definitions for it. qcom_rpm_resource::status_id is not used by driver, so just mark it as ~0. Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <ivan.ivanov@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Add devicetree binding documentation for the AXP152 PMIC, this is a stripped down version of the AXP202 PMIC with the battery charging function removed. Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
…PLD driver This patch adds the DMI system ID of the Kontron COMe-bBL6 and COME-cBW6 boards to the Kontron PLD driver. The list of supported products in the module description is also updated. Signed-off-by: Michael Brunner <michael.brunner@kontron.com> Acked-by: Christian Rauch <christian.rauch@kontron.com> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
The axp152 is a stripped down version of the axp202 pmic with the battery charging function removed as it is intended for top-set boxes. Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Linux 4.2-rc4
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2024
…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.12, take #3 - Stop wasting space in the HYP idmap, as we are dangerously close to the 4kB limit, and this has already exploded in -next - Fix another race in vgic_init() - Fix a UBSAN error when faking the cache topology with MTE enabled
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2024
Hou Tao says: ==================== The patch set fixes several issues in bits iterator. Patch #1 fixes the kmemleak problem of bits iterator. Patch #2~#3 fix the overflow problem of nr_bits. Patch #4 fixes the potential stack corruption when bits iterator is used on 32-bit host. Patch #5 adds more test cases for bits iterator. Please see the individual patches for more details. And comments are always welcome. --- v4: * patch #1: add ack from Yafang * patch #3: revert code-churn like changes: (1) compute nr_bytes and nr_bits before the check of nr_words. (2) use nr_bits == 64 to check for single u64, preventing build warning on 32-bit hosts. * patch #4: use "BITS_PER_LONG == 32" instead of "!defined(CONFIG_64BIT)" v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241025013233.804027-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/T/#t * split the bits-iterator related patches from "Misc fixes for bpf" patch set * patch #1: use "!nr_bits || bits >= nr_bits" to stop the iteration * patch #2: add a new helper for the overflow problem * patch #3: decrease the limitation from 512 to 511 and check whether nr_bytes is too large for bpf memory allocator explicitly * patch #5: add two more test cases for bit iterator v2: http://lore.kernel.org/bpf/d49fa2f4-f743-c763-7579-c3cab4dd88cb@huaweicloud.com ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241030100516.3633640-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2024
Petr Machata says: ==================== mlxsw: Fixes In this patchset: - Tx header should be pushed for each packet which is transmitted via Spectrum ASICs. Patch #1 adds a missing call to skb_cow_head() to make sure that there is both enough room to push the Tx header and that the SKB header is not cloned and can be modified. - Commit b5b60bb ("mlxsw: pci: Use page pool for Rx buffers allocation") converted mlxsw to use page pool for Rx buffers allocation. Sync for CPU and for device should be done for Rx pages. In patches #2 and #3, add the missing calls to sync pages for, respectively, CPU and the device. - Patch #4 then fixes a bug to IPv6 GRE forwarding offload. Patch #5 adds a generic forwarding test that fails with mlxsw ports prior to the fix. ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/cover.1729866134.git.petrm@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2024
Its used from trace__run(), for the 'perf trace' live mode, i.e. its
strace-like, non-perf.data file processing mode, the most common one.
The trace__run() function will set trace->host using machine__new_host()
that is supposed to give a machine instance representing the running
machine, and since we'll use perf_env__arch_strerrno() to get the right
errno -> string table, we need to use machine->env, so initialize it in
machine__new_host().
Before the patch:
(gdb) run trace --errno-summary -a sleep 1
<SNIP>
Summary of events:
gvfs-afc-volume (3187), 2 events, 0.0%
syscall calls errors total min avg max stddev
(msec) (msec) (msec) (msec) (%)
--------------- -------- ------ -------- --------- --------- --------- ------
pselect6 1 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00%
GUsbEventThread (3519), 2 events, 0.0%
syscall calls errors total min avg max stddev
(msec) (msec) (msec) (msec) (%)
--------------- -------- ------ -------- --------- --------- --------- ------
poll 1 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00%
<SNIP>
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00000000005caba0 in perf_env__arch_strerrno (env=0x0, err=110) at util/env.c:478
478 if (env->arch_strerrno == NULL)
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00000000005caba0 in perf_env__arch_strerrno (env=0x0, err=110) at util/env.c:478
#1 0x00000000004b75d2 in thread__dump_stats (ttrace=0x14f58f0, trace=0x7fffffffa5b0, fp=0x7ffff6ff74e0 <_IO_2_1_stderr_>) at builtin-trace.c:4673
#2 0x00000000004b78bf in trace__fprintf_thread (fp=0x7ffff6ff74e0 <_IO_2_1_stderr_>, thread=0x10fa0b0, trace=0x7fffffffa5b0) at builtin-trace.c:4708
#3 0x00000000004b7ad9 in trace__fprintf_thread_summary (trace=0x7fffffffa5b0, fp=0x7ffff6ff74e0 <_IO_2_1_stderr_>) at builtin-trace.c:4747
#4 0x00000000004b656e in trace__run (trace=0x7fffffffa5b0, argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffde60) at builtin-trace.c:4456
#5 0x00000000004ba43e in cmd_trace (argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffde60) at builtin-trace.c:5487
#6 0x00000000004c0414 in run_builtin (p=0xec3068 <commands+648>, argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffde60) at perf.c:351
linux-sunxi#7 0x00000000004c06bb in handle_internal_command (argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffde60) at perf.c:404
linux-sunxi#8 0x00000000004c0814 in run_argv (argcp=0x7fffffffdc4c, argv=0x7fffffffdc40) at perf.c:448
linux-sunxi#9 0x00000000004c0b5d in main (argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffde60) at perf.c:560
(gdb)
After:
root@number:~# perf trace -a --errno-summary sleep 1
<SNIP>
pw-data-loop (2685), 1410 events, 16.0%
syscall calls errors total min avg max stddev
(msec) (msec) (msec) (msec) (%)
--------------- -------- ------ -------- --------- --------- --------- ------
epoll_wait 188 0 983.428 0.000 5.231 15.595 8.68%
ioctl 94 0 0.811 0.004 0.009 0.016 2.82%
read 188 0 0.322 0.001 0.002 0.006 5.15%
write 141 0 0.280 0.001 0.002 0.018 8.39%
timerfd_settime 94 0 0.138 0.001 0.001 0.007 6.47%
gnome-control-c (179406), 1848 events, 20.9%
syscall calls errors total min avg max stddev
(msec) (msec) (msec) (msec) (%)
--------------- -------- ------ -------- --------- --------- --------- ------
poll 222 0 959.577 0.000 4.322 21.414 11.40%
recvmsg 150 0 0.539 0.001 0.004 0.013 5.12%
write 300 0 0.442 0.001 0.001 0.007 3.29%
read 150 0 0.183 0.001 0.001 0.009 5.53%
getpid 102 0 0.101 0.000 0.001 0.008 7.82%
root@number:~#
Fixes: 54373b5 ("perf env: Introduce perf_env__arch_strerrno()")
Reported-by: Veronika Molnarova <vmolnaro@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Veronika Molnarova <vmolnaro@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z0XffUgNSv_9OjOi@x1
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2024
This reworks hci_cb_list to not use mutex hci_cb_list_lock to avoid bugs
like the bellow:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:585
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 5070, name: kworker/u9:2
preempt_count: 0, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 0
4 locks held by kworker/u9:2/5070:
#0: ffff888015be3948 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3229 [inline]
#0: ffff888015be3948 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x8e0/0x1770 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
#1: ffffc90003b6fd00 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3230 [inline]
#1: ffffc90003b6fd00 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x91b/0x1770 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
#2: ffff8880665d0078 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_le_create_big_complete_evt+0xcf/0xae0 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:6914
#3: ffffffff8e132020 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:298 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e132020 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:750 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e132020 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: hci_le_create_big_complete_evt+0xdb/0xae0 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:6915
CPU: 0 PID: 5070 Comm: kworker/u9:2 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-08073-g480e035fc4c7 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024
Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
__might_resched+0x5d4/0x780 kernel/sched/core.c:10187
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0xc1/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
hci_connect_cfm include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h:2004 [inline]
hci_le_create_big_complete_evt+0x3d9/0xae0 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:6939
hci_event_func net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:7514 [inline]
hci_event_packet+0xa53/0x1540 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:7569
hci_rx_work+0x3e8/0xca0 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:4171
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xa00/0x1770 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416
kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243
</TASK>
Reported-by: syzbot+2fb0835e0c9cefc34614@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+2fb0835e0c9cefc34614@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2fb0835e0c9cefc34614
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2024
This fixes the circular locking dependency warning below, by releasing the socket lock before enterning iso_listen_bis, to avoid any potential deadlock with hdev lock. [ 75.307983] ====================================================== [ 75.307984] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 75.307985] 6.12.0-rc6+ linux-sunxi#22 Not tainted [ 75.307987] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 75.307987] kworker/u81:2/2623 is trying to acquire lock: [ 75.307988] ffff8fde1769da58 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO) at: iso_connect_cfm+0x253/0x840 [bluetooth] [ 75.308021] but task is already holding lock: [ 75.308022] ffff8fdd61a10078 (&hdev->lock) at: hci_le_per_adv_report_evt+0x47/0x2f0 [bluetooth] [ 75.308053] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 75.308054] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 75.308055] -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 75.308057] __mutex_lock+0xad/0xc50 [ 75.308061] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 75.308063] iso_sock_listen+0x143/0x5c0 [bluetooth] [ 75.308085] __sys_listen_socket+0x49/0x60 [ 75.308088] __x64_sys_listen+0x4c/0x90 [ 75.308090] x64_sys_call+0x2517/0x25f0 [ 75.308092] do_syscall_64+0x87/0x150 [ 75.308095] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 75.308098] -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 75.308100] __lock_acquire+0x155e/0x25f0 [ 75.308103] lock_acquire+0xc9/0x300 [ 75.308105] lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x90 [ 75.308107] iso_connect_cfm+0x253/0x840 [bluetooth] [ 75.308128] hci_connect_cfm+0x6c/0x190 [bluetooth] [ 75.308155] hci_le_per_adv_report_evt+0x27b/0x2f0 [bluetooth] [ 75.308180] hci_le_meta_evt+0xe7/0x200 [bluetooth] [ 75.308206] hci_event_packet+0x21f/0x5c0 [bluetooth] [ 75.308230] hci_rx_work+0x3ae/0xb10 [bluetooth] [ 75.308254] process_one_work+0x212/0x740 [ 75.308256] worker_thread+0x1bd/0x3a0 [ 75.308258] kthread+0xe4/0x120 [ 75.308259] ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 [ 75.308261] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 75.308263] other info that might help us debug this: [ 75.308264] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 75.308264] CPU0 CPU1 [ 75.308265] ---- ---- [ 75.308265] lock(&hdev->lock); [ 75.308267] lock(sk_lock- AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO); [ 75.308268] lock(&hdev->lock); [ 75.308269] lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO); [ 75.308270] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 75.308271] 4 locks held by kworker/u81:2/2623: [ 75.308272] #0: ffff8fdd66e52148 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0x740 [ 75.308276] #1: ffffafb488b7fe48 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)), at: process_one_work+0x1ce/0x740 [ 75.308280] #2: ffff8fdd61a10078 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3} at: hci_le_per_adv_report_evt+0x47/0x2f0 [bluetooth] [ 75.308304] #3: ffffffffb6ba4900 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: hci_connect_cfm+0x29/0x190 [bluetooth] Fixes: 02171da ("Bluetooth: ISO: Add hcon for listening bis sk") Signed-off-by: Iulia Tanasescu <iulia.tanasescu@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2024
…s_lock For storing a value to a queue attribute, the queue_attr_store function first freezes the queue (->q_usage_counter(io)) and then acquire ->sysfs_lock. This seems not correct as the usual ordering should be to acquire ->sysfs_lock before freezing the queue. This incorrect ordering causes the following lockdep splat which we are able to reproduce always simply by accessing /sys/kernel/debug file using ls command: [ 57.597146] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 57.597154] 6.12.0-10553-gb86545e02e8c linux-sunxi#20 Tainted: G W [ 57.597162] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 57.597168] ls/4605 is trying to acquire lock: [ 57.597176] c00000003eb56710 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: __might_fault+0x58/0xc0 [ 57.597200] but task is already holding lock: [ 57.597207] c0000018e27c6810 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}-{4:4}, at: iterate_dir+0x94/0x1d4 [ 57.597226] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 57.597233] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 57.597241] -> #5 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}-{4:4}: [ 57.597255] down_write+0x6c/0x18c [ 57.597264] start_creating+0xb4/0x24c [ 57.597274] debugfs_create_dir+0x2c/0x1e8 [ 57.597283] blk_register_queue+0xec/0x294 [ 57.597292] add_disk_fwnode+0x2e4/0x548 [ 57.597302] brd_alloc+0x2c8/0x338 [ 57.597309] brd_init+0x100/0x178 [ 57.597317] do_one_initcall+0x88/0x3e4 [ 57.597326] kernel_init_freeable+0x3cc/0x6e0 [ 57.597334] kernel_init+0x34/0x1cc [ 57.597342] ret_from_kernel_user_thread+0x14/0x1c [ 57.597350] -> #4 (&q->debugfs_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 57.597362] __mutex_lock+0xfc/0x12a0 [ 57.597370] blk_register_queue+0xd4/0x294 [ 57.597379] add_disk_fwnode+0x2e4/0x548 [ 57.597388] brd_alloc+0x2c8/0x338 [ 57.597395] brd_init+0x100/0x178 [ 57.597402] do_one_initcall+0x88/0x3e4 [ 57.597410] kernel_init_freeable+0x3cc/0x6e0 [ 57.597418] kernel_init+0x34/0x1cc [ 57.597426] ret_from_kernel_user_thread+0x14/0x1c [ 57.597434] -> #3 (&q->sysfs_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 57.597446] __mutex_lock+0xfc/0x12a0 [ 57.597454] queue_attr_store+0x9c/0x110 [ 57.597462] sysfs_kf_write+0x70/0xb0 [ 57.597471] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1b0/0x2ac [ 57.597480] vfs_write+0x3dc/0x6e8 [ 57.597488] ksys_write+0x84/0x140 [ 57.597495] system_call_exception+0x130/0x360 [ 57.597504] system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4 [ 57.597516] -> #2 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)linux-sunxi#21){++++}-{0:0}: [ 57.597530] __submit_bio+0x5ec/0x828 [ 57.597538] submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x1e4/0x4f0 [ 57.597547] iomap_readahead+0x2a0/0x448 [ 57.597556] xfs_vm_readahead+0x28/0x3c [ 57.597564] read_pages+0x88/0x41c [ 57.597571] page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x1ac/0x2d8 [ 57.597580] filemap_get_pages+0x188/0x984 [ 57.597588] filemap_read+0x13c/0x4bc [ 57.597596] xfs_file_buffered_read+0x88/0x17c [ 57.597605] xfs_file_read_iter+0xac/0x158 [ 57.597614] vfs_read+0x2d4/0x3b4 [ 57.597622] ksys_read+0x84/0x144 [ 57.597629] system_call_exception+0x130/0x360 [ 57.597637] system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4 [ 57.597647] -> #1 (mapping.invalidate_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}: [ 57.597661] down_read+0x6c/0x220 [ 57.597669] filemap_fault+0x870/0x100c [ 57.597677] xfs_filemap_fault+0xc4/0x18c [ 57.597684] __do_fault+0x64/0x164 [ 57.597693] __handle_mm_fault+0x1274/0x1dac [ 57.597702] handle_mm_fault+0x248/0x484 [ 57.597711] ___do_page_fault+0x428/0xc0c [ 57.597719] hash__do_page_fault+0x30/0x68 [ 57.597727] do_hash_fault+0x90/0x35c [ 57.597736] data_access_common_virt+0x210/0x220 [ 57.597745] _copy_from_user+0xf8/0x19c [ 57.597754] sel_write_load+0x178/0xd54 [ 57.597762] vfs_write+0x108/0x6e8 [ 57.597769] ksys_write+0x84/0x140 [ 57.597777] system_call_exception+0x130/0x360 [ 57.597785] system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4 [ 57.597794] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}: [ 57.597806] __lock_acquire+0x17cc/0x2330 [ 57.597814] lock_acquire+0x138/0x400 [ 57.597822] __might_fault+0x7c/0xc0 [ 57.597830] filldir64+0xe8/0x390 [ 57.597839] dcache_readdir+0x80/0x2d4 [ 57.597846] iterate_dir+0xd8/0x1d4 [ 57.597855] sys_getdents64+0x88/0x2d4 [ 57.597864] system_call_exception+0x130/0x360 [ 57.597872] system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4 [ 57.597881] other info that might help us debug this: [ 57.597888] Chain exists of: &mm->mmap_lock --> &q->debugfs_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3 [ 57.597905] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 57.597911] CPU0 CPU1 [ 57.597917] ---- ---- [ 57.597922] rlock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3); [ 57.597932] lock(&q->debugfs_mutex); [ 57.597940] lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3); [ 57.597950] rlock(&mm->mmap_lock); [ 57.597958] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 57.597965] 2 locks held by ls/4605: [ 57.597971] #0: c0000000137c12f8 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: fdget_pos+0xcc/0x154 [ 57.597989] #1: c0000018e27c6810 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}-{4:4}, at: iterate_dir+0x94/0x1d4 Prevent the above lockdep warning by acquiring ->sysfs_lock before freezing the queue while storing a queue attribute in queue_attr_store function. Later, we also found[1] another function __blk_mq_update_nr_ hw_queues where we first freeze queue and then acquire the ->sysfs_lock. So we've also updated lock ordering in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues function and ensured that in all code paths we follow the correct lock ordering i.e. acquire ->sysfs_lock before freezing the queue. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAFj5m9Ke8+EHKQBs_Nk6hqd=LGXtk4mUxZUN5==ZcCjnZSBwHw@mail.gmail.com/ Reported-by: kjain@linux.ibm.com Fixes: af28141 ("block: freeze the queue in queue_attr_store") Tested-by: kjain@linux.ibm.com Cc: hch@lst.de Cc: axboe@kernel.dk Cc: ritesh.list@gmail.com Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: gjoyce@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210144222.1066229-1-nilay@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2025
syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now) raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f linux-sunxi#29 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock: ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094: #0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0 #1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0 #2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180 #3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180 #4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 #5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f linux-sunxi#29 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work Call trace: show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C) __dump_stack+0x24/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8 lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0 eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108 io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430 __io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270 io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288 io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388 io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550 process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0 worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80 kthread+0x24c/0x300 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the raw timeout spinlock. Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock, split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock. Reported-by: syzbot+b1fc199a40b65d601b65@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 020b40f ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2025
…le_direct_reclaim() The task sometimes continues looping in throttle_direct_reclaim() because allow_direct_reclaim(pgdat) keeps returning false. #0 [ffff80002cb6f8d0] __switch_to at ffff8000080095ac #1 [ffff80002cb6f900] __schedule at ffff800008abbd1c #2 [ffff80002cb6f990] schedule at ffff800008abc50c #3 [ffff80002cb6f9b0] throttle_direct_reclaim at ffff800008273550 #4 [ffff80002cb6fa20] try_to_free_pages at ffff800008277b68 #5 [ffff80002cb6fae0] __alloc_pages_nodemask at ffff8000082c4660 #6 [ffff80002cb6fc50] alloc_pages_vma at ffff8000082e4a98 linux-sunxi#7 [ffff80002cb6fca0] do_anonymous_page at ffff80000829f5a8 linux-sunxi#8 [ffff80002cb6fce0] __handle_mm_fault at ffff8000082a5974 linux-sunxi#9 [ffff80002cb6fd90] handle_mm_fault at ffff8000082a5bd4 At this point, the pgdat contains the following two zones: NODE: 4 ZONE: 0 ADDR: ffff00817fffe540 NAME: "DMA32" SIZE: 20480 MIN/LOW/HIGH: 11/28/45 VM_STAT: NR_FREE_PAGES: 359 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_ANON: 18813 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_ANON: 0 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_FILE: 50 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_FILE: 0 NR_ZONE_UNEVICTABLE: 0 NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING: 0 NR_MLOCK: 0 NR_BOUNCE: 0 NR_ZSPAGES: 0 NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES: 0 NODE: 4 ZONE: 1 ADDR: ffff00817fffec00 NAME: "Normal" SIZE: 8454144 PRESENT: 98304 MIN/LOW/HIGH: 68/166/264 VM_STAT: NR_FREE_PAGES: 146 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_ANON: 94668 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_ANON: 3 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_FILE: 735 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_FILE: 78 NR_ZONE_UNEVICTABLE: 0 NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING: 0 NR_MLOCK: 0 NR_BOUNCE: 0 NR_ZSPAGES: 0 NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES: 0 In allow_direct_reclaim(), while processing ZONE_DMA32, the sum of inactive/active file-backed pages calculated in zone_reclaimable_pages() based on the result of zone_page_state_snapshot() is zero. Additionally, since this system lacks swap, the calculation of inactive/ active anonymous pages is skipped. crash> p nr_swap_pages nr_swap_pages = $1937 = { counter = 0 } As a result, ZONE_DMA32 is deemed unreclaimable and skipped, moving on to the processing of the next zone, ZONE_NORMAL, despite ZONE_DMA32 having free pages significantly exceeding the high watermark. The problem is that the pgdat->kswapd_failures hasn't been incremented. crash> px ((struct pglist_data *) 0xffff00817fffe540)->kswapd_failures $1935 = 0x0 This is because the node deemed balanced. The node balancing logic in balance_pgdat() evaluates all zones collectively. If one or more zones (e.g., ZONE_DMA32) have enough free pages to meet their watermarks, the entire node is deemed balanced. This causes balance_pgdat() to exit early before incrementing the kswapd_failures, as it considers the overall memory state acceptable, even though some zones (like ZONE_NORMAL) remain under significant pressure. The patch ensures that zone_reclaimable_pages() includes free pages (NR_FREE_PAGES) in its calculation when no other reclaimable pages are available (e.g., file-backed or anonymous pages). This change prevents zones like ZONE_DMA32, which have sufficient free pages, from being mistakenly deemed unreclaimable. By doing so, the patch ensures proper node balancing, avoids masking pressure on other zones like ZONE_NORMAL, and prevents infinite loops in throttle_direct_reclaim() caused by allow_direct_reclaim(pgdat) repeatedly returning false. The kernel hangs due to a task stuck in throttle_direct_reclaim(), caused by a node being incorrectly deemed balanced despite pressure in certain zones, such as ZONE_NORMAL. This issue arises from zone_reclaimable_pages() returning 0 for zones without reclaimable file- backed or anonymous pages, causing zones like ZONE_DMA32 with sufficient free pages to be skipped. The lack of swap or reclaimable pages results in ZONE_DMA32 being ignored during reclaim, masking pressure in other zones. Consequently, pgdat->kswapd_failures remains 0 in balance_pgdat(), preventing fallback mechanisms in allow_direct_reclaim() from being triggered, leading to an infinite loop in throttle_direct_reclaim(). This patch modifies zone_reclaimable_pages() to account for free pages (NR_FREE_PAGES) when no other reclaimable pages exist. This ensures zones with sufficient free pages are not skipped, enabling proper balancing and reclaim behavior. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style cleanups] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241130164346.436469-1-snishika@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241130161236.433747-2-snishika@redhat.com Fixes: 5a1c84b ("mm: remove reclaim and compaction retry approximations") Signed-off-by: Seiji Nishikawa <snishika@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2025
…nt message
Address a bug in the kernel that triggers a "sleeping function called from
invalid context" warning when /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak is printed under
specific conditions:
- CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y
- Set SELinux as the LSM for the system
- Set kptr_restrict to 1
- kmemleak buffer contains at least one item
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 136, name: cat
preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 2, expected: 2
6 locks held by cat/136:
#0: ffff32e64bcbf950 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: seq_read_iter+0xb8/0xe30
#1: ffffafe6aaa9dea0 (scan_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kmemleak_seq_start+0x34/0x128
#3: ffff32e6546b1cd0 (&object->lock){....}-{2:2}, at: kmemleak_seq_show+0x3c/0x1e0
#4: ffffafe6aa8d8560 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: has_ns_capability_noaudit+0x8/0x1b0
#5: ffffafe6aabbc0f8 (notif_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: avc_compute_av+0xc4/0x3d0
irq event stamp: 136660
hardirqs last enabled at (136659): [<ffffafe6a80fd7a0>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0xa8/0xd8
hardirqs last disabled at (136660): [<ffffafe6a80fd85c>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x8c/0xb0
softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffafe6a5d50b28>] copy_process+0x11d8/0x3df8
softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
Preemption disabled at:
[<ffffafe6a6598a4c>] kmemleak_seq_show+0x3c/0x1e0
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 136 Comm: cat Tainted: G E 6.11.0-rt7+ linux-sunxi#34
Tainted: [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0xa0/0x128
show_stack+0x1c/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0xe8/0x198
dump_stack+0x18/0x20
rt_spin_lock+0x8c/0x1a8
avc_perm_nonode+0xa0/0x150
cred_has_capability.isra.0+0x118/0x218
selinux_capable+0x50/0x80
security_capable+0x7c/0xd0
has_ns_capability_noaudit+0x94/0x1b0
has_capability_noaudit+0x20/0x30
restricted_pointer+0x21c/0x4b0
pointer+0x298/0x760
vsnprintf+0x330/0xf70
seq_printf+0x178/0x218
print_unreferenced+0x1a4/0x2d0
kmemleak_seq_show+0xd0/0x1e0
seq_read_iter+0x354/0xe30
seq_read+0x250/0x378
full_proxy_read+0xd8/0x148
vfs_read+0x190/0x918
ksys_read+0xf0/0x1e0
__arm64_sys_read+0x70/0xa8
invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0xd4/0x1d8
el0_svc+0x50/0x158
el0t_64_sync+0x17c/0x180
%pS and %pK, in the same back trace line, are redundant, and %pS can void
%pK service in certain contexts.
%pS alone already provides the necessary information, and if it cannot
resolve the symbol, it falls back to printing the raw address voiding
the original intent behind the %pK.
Additionally, %pK requires a privilege check CAP_SYSLOG enforced through
the LSM, which can trigger a "sleeping function called from invalid
context" warning under RT_PREEMPT kernels when the check occurs in an
atomic context. This issue may also affect other LSMs.
This change avoids the unnecessary privilege check and resolves the
sleeping function warning without any loss of information.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241217142032.55793-1-acarmina@redhat.com
Fixes: 3a6f33d ("mm/kmemleak: use %pK to display kernel pointers in backtrace")
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Carminati <acarmina@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Clément Léger <clement.leger@bootlin.com>
Cc: Alessandro Carminati <acarmina@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Chanudet <echanude@redhat.com>
Cc: Gabriele Paoloni <gpaoloni@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
repojohnray
pushed a commit
to repojohnray/linux-sunxi-4.7.y
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2025
commit 667574e upstream. When tries to demote 1G hugetlb folios, a lockdep warning is observed: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.10.0-rc6-00452-ga4d0275fa660-dirty linux-sunxi#79 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- bash/710 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff8f0a7850 (&h->resize_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: demote_store+0x244/0x460 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8f0a6f48 (&h->resize_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: demote_store+0xae/0x460 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&h->resize_lock); lock(&h->resize_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by bash/710: #0: ffff8f118439c3f0 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x64/0xe0 jwrdegoede#1: ffff8f11893b9e88 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xf8/0x1d0 jwrdegoede#2: ffff8f1183dc4428 (kn->active#98){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x100/0x1d0 jwrdegoede#3: ffffffff8f0a6f48 (&h->resize_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: demote_store+0xae/0x460 stack backtrace: CPU: 3 PID: 710 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.10.0-rc6-00452-ga4d0275fa660-dirty linux-sunxi#79 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0 __lock_acquire+0x10f2/0x1ca0 lock_acquire+0xbe/0x2d0 __mutex_lock+0x6d/0x400 demote_store+0x244/0x460 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x12c/0x1d0 vfs_write+0x380/0x540 ksys_write+0x64/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0xb9/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fa61db14887 RSP: 002b:00007ffc56c48358 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007fa61db14887 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 000055a030050220 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 000055a030050220 R08: 00007fa61dbd1460 R09: 000000007fffffff R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002 R13: 00007fa61dc1b780 R14: 00007fa61dc17600 R15: 00007fa61dc16a00 </TASK> Lockdep considers this an AA deadlock because the different resize_lock mutexes reside in the same lockdep class, but this is a false positive. Place them in distinct classes to avoid these warnings. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240712031314.2570452-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: 8531fc6 ("hugetlb: add hugetlb demote page support") Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Acked-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
repojohnray
pushed a commit
to repojohnray/linux-sunxi-4.7.y
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2025
[ Upstream commit 86a41ea ] When l2tp tunnels use a socket provided by userspace, we can hit lockdep splats like the below when data is transmitted through another (unrelated) userspace socket which then gets routed over l2tp. This issue was previously discussed here: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/87sfialu2n.fsf@cloudflare.com/ The solution is to have lockdep treat socket locks of l2tp tunnel sockets separately than those of standard INET sockets. To do so, use a different lockdep subclass where lock nesting is possible. ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.10.0+ linux-sunxi#34 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- iperf3/771 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8881027601d8 (slock-AF_INET/1){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0 but task is already holding lock: ffff888102650d98 (slock-AF_INET/1){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: tcp_v4_rcv+0x1848/0x1e10 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_INET/1); lock(slock-AF_INET/1); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 10 locks held by iperf3/771: #0: ffff888102650258 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: tcp_sendmsg+0x1a/0x40 jwrdegoede#1: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x4b/0xbc0 jwrdegoede#2: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x17a/0x1130 jwrdegoede#3: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x28b/0x9f0 jwrdegoede#4: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0xf9/0x260 jwrdegoede#5: ffff888102650d98 (slock-AF_INET/1){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: tcp_v4_rcv+0x1848/0x1e10 jwrdegoede#6: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x4b/0xbc0 linux-sunxi#7: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x17a/0x1130 linux-sunxi#8: ffffffff822ac1e0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0xcc/0x1450 linux-sunxi#9: ffff888101f33258 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock#2){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x513/0x1450 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 771 Comm: iperf3 Not tainted 6.10.0+ linux-sunxi#34 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x69/0xa0 dump_stack+0xc/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x135d/0x2600 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 lock_acquire+0xc4/0x2a0 ? l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0 ? __skb_checksum+0xa3/0x540 _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x35/0x50 ? l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0 l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0 l2tp_eth_dev_xmit+0x3c/0xc0 dev_hard_start_xmit+0x11e/0x420 sch_direct_xmit+0xc3/0x640 __dev_queue_xmit+0x61c/0x1450 ? ip_finish_output2+0xf4c/0x1130 ip_finish_output2+0x6b6/0x1130 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380 ip_output+0x99/0x120 __ip_queue_xmit+0xae4/0xbc0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? tcp_options_write.constprop.0+0xcb/0x3e0 ip_queue_xmit+0x34/0x40 __tcp_transmit_skb+0x1625/0x1890 __tcp_send_ack+0x1b8/0x340 tcp_send_ack+0x23/0x30 __tcp_ack_snd_check+0xa8/0x530 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 tcp_rcv_established+0x412/0xd70 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x299/0x420 tcp_v4_rcv+0x1991/0x1e10 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x50/0x220 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x158/0x260 ip_local_deliver+0xc8/0xe0 ip_rcv+0xe5/0x1d0 ? __pfx_ip_rcv+0x10/0x10 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0xce/0xe0 ? process_backlog+0x28b/0x9f0 __netif_receive_skb+0x34/0xd0 ? process_backlog+0x28b/0x9f0 process_backlog+0x2cb/0x9f0 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0x61/0x280 net_rx_action+0x332/0x670 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 handle_softirqs+0xda/0x480 ? __dev_queue_xmit+0xa2c/0x1450 do_softirq+0xa1/0xd0 </IRQ> <TASK> __local_bh_enable_ip+0xc8/0xe0 ? __dev_queue_xmit+0xa2c/0x1450 __dev_queue_xmit+0xa48/0x1450 ? ip_finish_output2+0xf4c/0x1130 ip_finish_output2+0x6b6/0x1130 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380 ip_output+0x99/0x120 __ip_queue_xmit+0xae4/0xbc0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? tcp_options_write.constprop.0+0xcb/0x3e0 ip_queue_xmit+0x34/0x40 __tcp_transmit_skb+0x1625/0x1890 tcp_write_xmit+0x766/0x2fb0 ? __entry_text_end+0x102ba9/0x102bad ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __might_fault+0x74/0xc0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x56/0x190 tcp_push+0x117/0x310 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x14c1/0x1740 tcp_sendmsg+0x28/0x40 inet_sendmsg+0x5d/0x90 sock_write_iter+0x242/0x2b0 vfs_write+0x68d/0x800 ? __pfx_sock_write_iter+0x10/0x10 ksys_write+0xc8/0xf0 __x64_sys_write+0x3d/0x50 x64_sys_call+0xfaf/0x1f50 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f4d143af992 Code: c3 8b 07 85 c0 75 24 49 89 fb 48 89 f0 48 89 d7 48 89 ce 4c 89 c2 4d 89 ca 4c 8b 44 24 08 4c 8b 4c 24 10 4c 89 5c 24 08 0f 05 <c3> e9 01 cc ff ff 41 54 b8 02 00 00 0 RSP: 002b:00007ffd65032058 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f4d143af992 RDX: 0000000000000025 RSI: 00007f4d143f3bcc RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007f4d143f2b28 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f4d143f3bcc R13: 0000000000000005 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007ffd650323f0 </TASK> Fixes: 0b2c597 ("l2tp: close all race conditions in l2tp_tunnel_register()") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: syzbot+6acef9e0a4d1f46c83d4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=6acef9e0a4d1f46c83d4 CC: gnault@redhat.com CC: cong.wang@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240806160626.1248317-1-jchapman@katalix.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
repojohnray
pushed a commit
to repojohnray/linux-sunxi-4.7.y
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2025
[ Upstream commit 83f4414 ] Test case: 2 threads write short inline data to a file. In ext4_page_mkwrite the resulting inline data is converted. Handling ext4_grp_locked_error with description "block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent: X vs Y free clusters" calls ext4_force_shutdown. The conversion clears EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA but fails for ext4_destroy_inline_data_nolock and ext4_mark_iloc_dirty due to ext4_forced_shutdown. The restoration of inline data fails for the same reason not setting EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA. Without the flag set a regular process path in ext4_da_write_end follows trying to dereference page folio private pointer that has not been set. The fix calls early return with -EIO error shall the pointer to private be NULL. Sample crash report: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address dfff800000000004 KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000020-0x0000000000000027] Mem abort info: ESR = 0x0000000096000005 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000 CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [dfff800000000004] address between user and kernel address ranges Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [jwrdegoede#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 20274 Comm: syz-executor185 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-gfda5695d692c #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : __block_commit_write+0x64/0x2b0 fs/buffer.c:2167 lr : __block_commit_write+0x3c/0x2b0 fs/buffer.c:2160 sp : ffff8000a1957600 x29: ffff8000a1957610 x28: dfff800000000000 x27: ffff0000e30e34b0 x26: 0000000000000000 x25: dfff800000000000 x24: dfff800000000000 x23: fffffdffc397c9e0 x22: 0000000000000020 x21: 0000000000000020 x20: 0000000000000040 x19: fffffdffc397c9c0 x18: 1fffe000367bd196 x17: ffff80008eead000 x16: ffff80008ae89e3c x15: 00000000200000c0 x14: 1fffe0001cbe4e04 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000ff0100 x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 0000000000000004 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000 x5 : fffffdffc397c9c0 x4 : 0000000000000020 x3 : 0000000000000020 x2 : 0000000000000040 x1 : 0000000000000020 x0 : fffffdffc397c9c0 Call trace: __block_commit_write+0x64/0x2b0 fs/buffer.c:2167 block_write_end+0xb4/0x104 fs/buffer.c:2253 ext4_da_do_write_end fs/ext4/inode.c:2955 [inline] ext4_da_write_end+0x2c4/0xa40 fs/ext4/inode.c:3028 generic_perform_write+0x394/0x588 mm/filemap.c:3985 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x2c0/0x4ec fs/ext4/file.c:299 ext4_file_write_iter+0x188/0x1780 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2110 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline] vfs_write+0x968/0xc3c fs/read_write.c:590 ksys_write+0x15c/0x26c fs/read_write.c:643 __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:655 [inline] __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:652 [inline] __arm64_sys_write+0x7c/0x90 fs/read_write.c:652 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:34 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:48 el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:133 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:152 el0_svc+0x54/0x168 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:712 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:730 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:598 Code: 97f85911 f94002da 91008356 d343fec8 (38796908) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- ---------------- Code disassembly (best guess): 0: 97f85911 bl 0xffffffffffe16444 4: f94002da ldr x26, [x22] 8: 91008356 add x22, x26, #0x20 c: d343fec8 lsr x8, x22, jwrdegoede#3 * 10: 38796908 ldrb w8, [x8, x25] <-- trapping instruction Reported-by: syzbot+18df508cf00a0598d9a6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=18df508cf00a0598d9a6 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000f19a1406109eb5c5@google.com/T/ Signed-off-by: Wojciech Gładysz <wojciech.gladysz@infogain.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240703070112.10235-1-wojciech.gladysz@infogain.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
repojohnray
pushed a commit
to repojohnray/linux-sunxi-4.7.y
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2025
[ Upstream commit b313a8c ] Lockdep reported a warning in Linux version 6.6: [ 414.344659] ================================ [ 414.345155] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 414.345658] 6.6.0-07439-gba2303cacfda jwrdegoede#6 Not tainted [ 414.346221] -------------------------------- [ 414.346712] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage. [ 414.347545] kworker/u10:3/1152 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes: [ 414.349245] ffff88810edd1098 (&sbq->ws[i].wait){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x131c/0x1ee0 [ 414.351204] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at: [ 414.351751] lock_acquire+0x18d/0x460 [ 414.352218] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x39/0x60 [ 414.352769] __wake_up_common_lock+0x22/0x60 [ 414.353289] sbitmap_queue_wake_up+0x375/0x4f0 [ 414.353829] sbitmap_queue_clear+0xdd/0x270 [ 414.354338] blk_mq_put_tag+0xdf/0x170 [ 414.354807] __blk_mq_free_request+0x381/0x4d0 [ 414.355335] blk_mq_free_request+0x28b/0x3e0 [ 414.355847] __blk_mq_end_request+0x242/0xc30 [ 414.356367] scsi_end_request+0x2c1/0x830 [ 414.345155] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 414.345658] 6.6.0-07439-gba2303cacfda jwrdegoede#6 Not tainted [ 414.346221] -------------------------------- [ 414.346712] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage. [ 414.347545] kworker/u10:3/1152 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes: [ 414.349245] ffff88810edd1098 (&sbq->ws[i].wait){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x131c/0x1ee0 [ 414.351204] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at: [ 414.351751] lock_acquire+0x18d/0x460 [ 414.352218] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x39/0x60 [ 414.352769] __wake_up_common_lock+0x22/0x60 [ 414.353289] sbitmap_queue_wake_up+0x375/0x4f0 [ 414.353829] sbitmap_queue_clear+0xdd/0x270 [ 414.354338] blk_mq_put_tag+0xdf/0x170 [ 414.354807] __blk_mq_free_request+0x381/0x4d0 [ 414.355335] blk_mq_free_request+0x28b/0x3e0 [ 414.355847] __blk_mq_end_request+0x242/0xc30 [ 414.356367] scsi_end_request+0x2c1/0x830 [ 414.356863] scsi_io_completion+0x177/0x1610 [ 414.357379] scsi_complete+0x12f/0x260 [ 414.357856] blk_complete_reqs+0xba/0xf0 [ 414.358338] __do_softirq+0x1b0/0x7a2 [ 414.358796] irq_exit_rcu+0x14b/0x1a0 [ 414.359262] sysvec_call_function_single+0xaf/0xc0 [ 414.359828] asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0x1a/0x20 [ 414.360426] default_idle+0x1e/0x30 [ 414.360873] default_idle_call+0x9b/0x1f0 [ 414.361390] do_idle+0x2d2/0x3e0 [ 414.361819] cpu_startup_entry+0x55/0x60 [ 414.362314] start_secondary+0x235/0x2b0 [ 414.362809] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0x18f/0x19b [ 414.363413] irq event stamp: 428794 [ 414.363825] hardirqs last enabled at (428793): [<ffffffff816bfd1c>] ktime_get+0x1dc/0x200 [ 414.364694] hardirqs last disabled at (428794): [<ffffffff85470177>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x47/0x50 [ 414.365629] softirqs last enabled at (428444): [<ffffffff85474780>] __do_softirq+0x540/0x7a2 [ 414.366522] softirqs last disabled at (428419): [<ffffffff813f65ab>] irq_exit_rcu+0x14b/0x1a0 [ 414.367425] other info that might help us debug this: [ 414.368194] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 414.368900] CPU0 [ 414.369225] ---- [ 414.369548] lock(&sbq->ws[i].wait); [ 414.370000] <Interrupt> [ 414.370342] lock(&sbq->ws[i].wait); [ 414.370802] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 414.371569] 5 locks held by kworker/u10:3/1152: [ 414.372088] #0: ffff88810130e938 ((wq_completion)writeback){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x357/0x13f0 [ 414.373180] jwrdegoede#1: ffff88810201fdb8 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x3a3/0x13f0 [ 414.374384] jwrdegoede#2: ffffffff86ffbdc0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x637/0xa00 [ 414.375342] jwrdegoede#3: ffff88810edd1098 (&sbq->ws[i].wait){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x131c/0x1ee0 [ 414.376377] jwrdegoede#4: ffff888106205a08 (&hctx->dispatch_wait_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x1337/0x1ee0 [ 414.378607] stack backtrace: [ 414.379177] CPU: 0 PID: 1152 Comm: kworker/u10:3 Not tainted 6.6.0-07439-gba2303cacfda jwrdegoede#6 [ 414.380032] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 414.381177] Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-253:0) [ 414.381805] Call Trace: [ 414.382136] <TASK> [ 414.382429] dump_stack_lvl+0x91/0xf0 [ 414.382884] mark_lock_irq+0xb3b/0x1260 [ 414.383367] ? __pfx_mark_lock_irq+0x10/0x10 [ 414.383889] ? stack_trace_save+0x8e/0xc0 [ 414.384373] ? __pfx_stack_trace_save+0x10/0x10 [ 414.384903] ? graph_lock+0xcf/0x410 [ 414.385350] ? save_trace+0x3d/0xc70 [ 414.385808] mark_lock.part.20+0x56d/0xa90 [ 414.386317] mark_held_locks+0xb0/0x110 [ 414.386791] ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 414.387320] lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x297/0x3f0 [ 414.387901] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x28/0x50 [ 414.388422] trace_hardirqs_on+0x58/0x100 [ 414.388917] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x28/0x50 [ 414.389422] __blk_mq_tag_busy+0x1d6/0x2a0 [ 414.389920] __blk_mq_get_driver_tag+0x761/0x9f0 [ 414.390899] blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x1780/0x1ee0 [ 414.391473] ? __pfx_blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x10/0x10 [ 414.392070] ? sbitmap_get+0x2b8/0x450 [ 414.392533] ? __blk_mq_get_driver_tag+0x210/0x9f0 [ 414.393095] __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0xd99/0x1690 [ 414.393730] ? elv_attempt_insert_merge+0x1b1/0x420 [ 414.394302] ? __pfx___blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x10/0x10 [ 414.394970] ? lock_acquire+0x18d/0x460 [ 414.395456] ? blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x637/0xa00 [ 414.395986] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 414.396499] blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x109/0x190 [ 414.397100] blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x66e/0xa00 [ 414.397616] blk_mq_flush_plug_list.part.17+0x614/0x2030 [ 414.398244] ? __pfx_blk_mq_flush_plug_list.part.17+0x10/0x10 [ 414.398897] ? writeback_sb_inodes+0x241/0xcc0 [ 414.399429] blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x65/0x80 [ 414.399957] __blk_flush_plug+0x2f1/0x530 [ 414.400458] ? __pfx___blk_flush_plug+0x10/0x10 [ 414.400999] blk_finish_plug+0x59/0xa0 [ 414.401467] wb_writeback+0x7cc/0x920 [ 414.401935] ? __pfx_wb_writeback+0x10/0x10 [ 414.402442] ? mark_held_locks+0xb0/0x110 [ 414.402931] ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 414.403462] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x297/0x3f0 [ 414.404062] wb_workfn+0x2b3/0xcf0 [ 414.404500] ? __pfx_wb_workfn+0x10/0x10 [ 414.404989] process_scheduled_works+0x432/0x13f0 [ 414.405546] ? __pfx_process_scheduled_works+0x10/0x10 [ 414.406139] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x101/0x2a0 [ 414.406641] ? assign_work+0x19b/0x240 [ 414.407106] ? lock_is_held_type+0x9d/0x110 [ 414.407604] worker_thread+0x6f2/0x1160 [ 414.408075] ? __kthread_parkme+0x62/0x210 [ 414.408572] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x297/0x3f0 [ 414.409168] ? __kthread_parkme+0x13c/0x210 [ 414.409678] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 414.410191] kthread+0x33c/0x440 [ 414.410602] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 414.411068] ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 [ 414.411526] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 414.411993] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 [ 414.412489] </TASK> When interrupt is turned on while a lock holding by spin_lock_irq it throws a warning because of potential deadlock. blk_mq_prep_dispatch_rq blk_mq_get_driver_tag __blk_mq_get_driver_tag __blk_mq_alloc_driver_tag blk_mq_tag_busy -> tag is already busy // failed to get driver tag blk_mq_mark_tag_wait spin_lock_irq(&wq->lock) -> lock A (&sbq->ws[i].wait) __add_wait_queue(wq, wait) -> wait queue active blk_mq_get_driver_tag __blk_mq_tag_busy -> 1) tag must be idle, which means there can't be inflight IO spin_lock_irq(&tags->lock) -> lock B (hctx->tags) spin_unlock_irq(&tags->lock) -> unlock B, turn on interrupt accidentally -> 2) context must be preempt by IO interrupt to trigger deadlock. As shown above, the deadlock is not possible in theory, but the warning still need to be fixed. Fix it by using spin_lock_irqsave to get lockB instead of spin_lock_irq. Fixes: 4f1731d ("blk-mq: fix potential io hang by wrong 'wake_batch'") Signed-off-by: Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240815024736.2040971-1-lilingfeng@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
jwrdegoede
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2025
Since commit 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") there is the following ABBA deadlock (simplified) between the LED trigger code and the power-supply code: 1) When registering a power-supply class device, power_supply_register() calls led_trigger_register() from power_supply_create_triggers() in a scoped_guard(rwsem_read, &psy->extensions_sem) context. led_trigger_register() then in turn takes a LED subsystem lock. So here we have the following locking order: * Read-lock extensions_sem * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) 2) When registering a LED class device, with its default trigger set to a power-supply LED trigger (which has already been registered) The LED class code calls power_supply_led_trigger_activate() when setting up the default trigger. power_supply_led_trigger_activate() calls power_supply_get_property() to determine the initial value of to assign to the LED and that read-locks extensions_sem. So now we have the following locking order: * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) * Read-lock extensions_sem Fixing this is easy, there is no need to hold the extensions_sem when calling power_supply_create_triggers() since all triggers are always created rather then checking for the presence of certain attributes as power_supply_add_hwmon_sysfs() does. Move power_supply_create_triggers() out of the guard block to fix this. Here is the lockdep report fixed by this change: [ 31.249343] ====================================================== [ 31.249378] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 31.249413] 6.13.0-rc6+ linux-sunxi#251 Tainted: G C E [ 31.249440] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 31.249471] (udev-worker)/553 is trying to acquire lock: [ 31.249501] ffff892adbcaf660 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.249574] but task is already holding lock: [ 31.249603] ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249657] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 31.249696] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 31.249735] -> #2 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 31.249778] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.249803] led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249833] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.249863] input_leds_connect+0x1dc/0x2a0 [ 31.249889] input_attach_handler.isra.0+0x75/0x90 [ 31.249921] input_register_device.cold+0xa1/0x150 [ 31.249955] hidinput_connect+0x8a2/0xb80 [ 31.249982] hid_connect+0x582/0x5c0 [ 31.250007] hid_hw_start+0x3f/0x60 [ 31.250030] hid_device_probe+0x122/0x1f0 [ 31.250053] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250080] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250105] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250132] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250160] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250184] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250207] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250230] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250252] hid_add_device+0xe5/0x240 [ 31.250279] usbhid_probe+0x4dc/0x620 [ 31.250303] usb_probe_interface+0xe4/0x2a0 [ 31.250329] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250353] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250377] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250404] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250431] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250455] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250478] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250501] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250523] usb_set_configuration+0x606/0x8a0 [ 31.250552] usb_generic_driver_probe+0x3e/0x60 [ 31.250579] usb_probe_device+0x3d/0x120 [ 31.250605] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250629] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250653] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250680] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250707] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250731] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250753] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250776] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250798] usb_new_device.cold+0x141/0x38f [ 31.250828] hub_event+0x1166/0x1980 [ 31.250854] process_one_work+0x20f/0x580 [ 31.250879] worker_thread+0x1d1/0x3b0 [ 31.250904] kthread+0xee/0x120 [ 31.250926] ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 [ 31.250954] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 31.250982] -> #1 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}: [ 31.251022] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.251045] led_trigger_register+0x40/0x1b0 [ 31.251074] power_supply_register_led_trigger+0x88/0x150 [ 31.251107] power_supply_create_triggers+0x55/0xe0 [ 31.251135] __power_supply_register.part.0+0x34e/0x4a0 [ 31.251164] devm_power_supply_register+0x70/0xc0 [ 31.251190] bq27xxx_battery_setup+0x1a1/0x6d0 [bq27xxx_battery] [ 31.251235] bq27xxx_battery_i2c_probe+0xe5/0x17f [bq27xxx_battery_i2c] [ 31.251272] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.251299] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.251324] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.251348] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.251375] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.251398] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.251421] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.251445] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.251470] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.251498] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.251522] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.251550] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.251575] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.251598] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.251629] -> #0 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}: [ 31.251668] __lock_acquire+0x13ce/0x21c0 [ 31.251694] lock_acquire+0xcf/0x2e0 [ 31.251719] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 31.251741] power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.251774] power_supply_update_leds+0x8d/0x230 [ 31.251804] power_supply_led_trigger_activate+0x18/0x20 [ 31.251837] led_trigger_set+0x1fc/0x300 [ 31.251863] led_trigger_set_default+0x90/0xe0 [ 31.251892] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.251921] devm_led_classdev_multicolor_register_ext+0x6e/0xb80 [led_class_multicolor] [ 31.251969] ktd202x_probe+0x464/0x5c0 [leds_ktd202x] [ 31.252002] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.252027] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.252052] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.252076] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.252103] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.252125] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.252148] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.252172] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.252197] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.252225] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.252248] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.252274] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.253986] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.255826] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.257614] other info that might help us debug this: [ 31.257619] Chain exists of: &psy->extensions_sem --> triggers_list_lock --> &led_cdev->trigger_lock [ 31.257630] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 31.257632] CPU0 CPU1 [ 31.257633] ---- ---- [ 31.257634] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257637] lock(triggers_list_lock); [ 31.257640] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257643] rlock(&psy->extensions_sem); [ 31.257646] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 31.289433] 4 locks held by (udev-worker)/553: [ 31.289443] #0: ffff892ad9658108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __driver_attach+0xaf/0x1c0 [ 31.289463] #1: ffff892adbc0bbc8 (&led_cdev->led_access){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_classdev_register_ext+0x1c7/0x3a0 [ 31.289476] #2: ffffffffad0e30b0 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x2c/0xe0 [ 31.289487] #3: ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 Fixes: 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Cc: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2025
If GuC fails to load, the driver wedges, but in the process it tries to do stuff that may not be initialized yet. This moves the xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_init() to be done earlier: as its own doc says, it's a software-only initialization and should had been named with the _early() suffix. Move it to be called by xe_gt_init_early(), so the locks and seqno are initialized, avoiding a NULL ptr deref when wedging: xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* GT0: load failed: status: Reset = 0, BootROM = 0x50, UKernel = 0x00, MIA = 0x00, Auth = 0x01 xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* GT0: firmware signature verification failed xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* CRITICAL: Xe has declared device 0000:03:00.0 as wedged. ... BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 9 UID: 0 PID: 3908 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G U W 6.13.0-rc4-xe+ #3 Tainted: [U]=USER, [W]=WARN Hardware name: Intel Corporation Alder Lake Client Platform/AlderLake-S ADP-S DDR5 UDIMM CRB, BIOS ADLSFWI1.R00.3275.A00.2207010640 07/01/2022 RIP: 0010:xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_reset+0x75/0x110 [xe] This can be easily triggered by poking the GuC binary to force a signature failure. There will still be an extra message, xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* GT0: GuC mmio request 0x4100: no reply 0x4100 but that's better than a NULL ptr deref. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/3956 Fixes: c9474b7 ("drm/xe: Wedge the entire device") Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250103001111.331684-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> (cherry picked from commit 5001ef3) Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2025
We found a timeout problem with the pldm command on our system. The reason is that the MCTP-I3C driver has a race condition when receiving multiple-packet messages in multi-thread, resulting in a wrong packet order problem. We identified this problem by adding a debug message to the mctp_i3c_read function. According to the MCTP spec, a multiple-packet message must be composed in sequence, and if there is a wrong sequence, the whole message will be discarded and wait for the next SOM. For example, SOM → Pkt Seq #2 → Pkt Seq #1 → Pkt Seq #3 → EOM. Therefore, we try to solve this problem by adding a mutex to the mctp_i3c_read function. Before the modification, when a command requesting a multiple-packet message response is sent consecutively, an error usually occurs within 100 loops. After the mutex, it can go through 40000 loops without any error, and it seems to run well. Fixes: c8755b2 ("mctp i3c: MCTP I3C driver") Signed-off-by: Leo Yang <Leo-Yang@quantatw.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250107031529.3296094-1-Leo-Yang@quantatw.com [pabeni@redhat.com: dropped already answered question from changelog] Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2025
…ux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 changes for 6.13, part #3 - Always check page state in hyp_ack_unshare() - Align set_id_regs selftest with the fact that ASIDBITS field is RO - Various vPMU fixes for bugs that only affect nested virt
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2025
irq_chip functions may be called in raw spinlock context. Therefore, we must also use a raw spinlock for our own internal locking. This fixes the following lockdep splat: [ 5.349336] ============================= [ 5.353349] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 5.357361] 6.13.0-rc5+ linux-sunxi#69 Tainted: G W [ 5.363031] ----------------------------- [ 5.367045] kworker/u17:1/44 is trying to lock: [ 5.371587] ffffff88018b02c0 (&chip->gpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: xgpio_irq_unmask (drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:433 (discriminator 8)) [ 5.380079] other info that might help us debug this: [ 5.385138] context-{5:5} [ 5.387762] 5 locks held by kworker/u17:1/44: [ 5.392123] #0: ffffff8800014958 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3204) [ 5.402260] #1: ffffffc082fcbdd8 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3205) [ 5.411528] #2: ffffff880172c900 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_attach (drivers/base/dd.c:1006) [ 5.419929] #3: ffffff88039c8268 (request_class#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq (kernel/irq/internals.h:156 kernel/irq/manage.c:1596) [ 5.428331] #4: ffffff88039c80c8 (lock_class#2){....}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:1614) [ 5.436472] stack backtrace: [ 5.439359] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 44 Comm: kworker/u17:1 Tainted: G W 6.13.0-rc5+ linux-sunxi#69 [ 5.448690] Tainted: [W]=WARN [ 5.451656] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) [ 5.455845] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func [ 5.461699] Call trace: [ 5.464147] show_stack+0x18/0x24 C [ 5.467821] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123) [ 5.471501] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:130) [ 5.474824] __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4828 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176) [ 5.478758] lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:467 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5814) [ 5.482429] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave (include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:111 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162) [ 5.486797] xgpio_irq_unmask (drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:433 (discriminator 8)) [ 5.490737] irq_enable (kernel/irq/internals.h:236 kernel/irq/chip.c:170 kernel/irq/chip.c:439 kernel/irq/chip.c:432 kernel/irq/chip.c:345) [ 5.494060] __irq_startup (kernel/irq/internals.h:241 kernel/irq/chip.c:180 kernel/irq/chip.c:250) [ 5.497645] irq_startup (kernel/irq/chip.c:270) [ 5.501143] __setup_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:1807) [ 5.504728] request_threaded_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:2208) Fixes: a32c7ca ("gpio: gpio-xilinx: Add interrupt support") Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250110163354.2012654-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2025
This commit addresses a circular locking dependency issue within the GFX isolation mechanism. The problem was identified by a warning indicating a potential deadlock due to inconsistent lock acquisition order. - The `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use` and `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_end_use` functions previously acquired `enforce_isolation_mutex` and called `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl`, leading to potential deadlocks. ie., If `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called while `enforce_isolation_mutex` is held, and `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler` is called while `kfd_sch_mutex` is held, it can create a circular dependency. By ensuring consistent lock usage, this fix resolves the issue: [ 606.297333] ====================================================== [ 606.297343] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 606.297353] 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof linux-sunxi#19 Tainted: G OE [ 606.297365] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 606.297375] kworker/u96:3/3825 is trying to acquire lock: [ 606.297385] ffff9aa64e431cb8 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.297413] but task is already holding lock: [ 606.297423] ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.297725] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 606.297738] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 606.297749] -> #2 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 606.297765] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930 [ 606.297776] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 606.297786] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298007] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298225] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.298412] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298603] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298866] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.298880] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.298890] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.298899] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.298908] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.298919] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.298929] -> #1 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 606.298947] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930 [ 606.298956] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 606.298966] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler+0x87/0x370 [amdgpu] [ 606.299190] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.299199] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.299208] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.299217] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.299227] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.299236] -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 606.299257] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810 [ 606.299267] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 606.299276] __flush_work+0x250/0x610 [ 606.299286] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80 [ 606.299296] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.299509] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.299723] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.299909] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300101] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300355] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.300369] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.300378] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.300387] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.300396] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.300406] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.300416] other info that might help us debug this: [ 606.300428] Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work) --> &adev->enforce_isolation_mutex --> &adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex [ 606.300458] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 606.300468] CPU0 CPU1 [ 606.300476] ---- ---- [ 606.300484] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex); [ 606.300494] lock(&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex); [ 606.300508] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex); [ 606.300521] lock((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)); [ 606.300536] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 606.300546] 5 locks held by kworker/u96:3/3825: [ 606.300555] #0: ffff9aa5aa1f5d58 ((wq_completion)comp_1.1.0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x3f5/0x680 [ 606.300577] #1: ffffaa53c3c97e40 ((work_completion)(&sched->work_run_job)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d6/0x680 [ 606.300600] #2: ffff9aa64e463c98 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x1c3/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300837] #3: ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.301062] #4: ffffffff8c1a5660 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __flush_work+0x70/0x610 [ 606.301083] stack backtrace: [ 606.301092] CPU: 14 PID: 3825 Comm: kworker/u96:3 Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof linux-sunxi#19 [ 606.301109] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570S GAMING X/X570S GAMING X, BIOS F7 03/22/2024 [ 606.301124] Workqueue: comp_1.1.0 drm_sched_run_job_work [gpu_sched] [ 606.301140] Call Trace: [ 606.301146] <TASK> [ 606.301154] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0 [ 606.301166] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [ 606.301175] print_circular_bug+0x26c/0x340 [ 606.301187] check_noncircular+0x157/0x170 [ 606.301197] ? register_lock_class+0x48/0x490 [ 606.301213] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810 [ 606.301230] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 606.301239] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301250] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.301261] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 606.301274] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301284] __flush_work+0x250/0x610 [ 606.301293] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301305] ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10 [ 606.301318] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 606.301331] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.301345] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80 [ 606.301356] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.301661] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.302050] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.302069] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.302452] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.302862] ? drm_sched_entity_error+0x82/0x190 [gpu_sched] [ 606.302890] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.303366] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.303388] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.303409] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.303424] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303437] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.303449] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303463] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.303476] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303489] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.303512] </TASK> v2: Refactor lock handling to resolve circular dependency (Alex) - Introduced a `sched_work` flag to defer the call to `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` until after releasing `enforce_isolation_mutex`. - This change ensures that `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called outside the critical section, preventing the circular dependency and deadlock. - The `sched_work` flag is set within the mutex-protected section if conditions are met, and the actual function call is made afterward. - This approach ensures consistent lock acquisition order. Fixes: afefd6f ("drm/amdgpu: Implement Enforce Isolation Handler for KGD/KFD serialization") Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com> Suggested-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (cherry picked from commit 0b6b2dd) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2025
Fix a lockdep warning [1] observed during the write combining test.
The warning indicates a potential nested lock scenario that could lead
to a deadlock.
However, this is a false positive alarm because the SF lock and its
parent lock are distinct ones.
The lockdep confusion arises because the locks belong to the same object
class (i.e., struct mlx5_core_dev).
To resolve this, the code has been refactored to avoid taking both
locks. Instead, only the parent lock is acquired.
[1]
raw_ethernet_bw/2118 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 213.619032] ffff88811dd75e08 (&dev->wc_state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.620270]
[ 213.620270] but task is already holding lock:
[ 213.620943] ffff88810b585e08 (&dev->wc_state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
mlx5_wc_support_get+0x10c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.622045]
[ 213.622045] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 213.622778] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 213.622778]
[ 213.623465] CPU0
[ 213.623815] ----
[ 213.624148] lock(&dev->wc_state_lock);
[ 213.624615] lock(&dev->wc_state_lock);
[ 213.625071]
[ 213.625071] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 213.625071]
[ 213.625805] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 213.625805]
[ 213.626522] 4 locks held by raw_ethernet_bw/2118:
[ 213.627019] #0: ffff88813f80d578 (&uverbs_dev->disassociate_srcu){.+.+}-{0:0},
at: ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xc4/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.628088] #1: ffff88810fb23930 (&file->hw_destroy_rwsem){.+.+}-{3:3},
at: ib_init_ucontext+0x2d/0xf0 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.629094] #2: ffff88810fb23878 (&file->ucontext_lock){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: ib_init_ucontext+0x49/0xf0 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.630106] #3: ffff88810b585e08 (&dev->wc_state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: mlx5_wc_support_get+0x10c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.631185]
[ 213.631185] stack backtrace:
[ 213.631718] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2118 Comm: raw_ethernet_bw Not tainted
6.12.0-rc7_internal_net_next_mlx5_89a0ad0 #1
[ 213.632722] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS
rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 213.633785] Call Trace:
[ 213.634099]
[ 213.634393] dump_stack_lvl+0x7e/0xc0
[ 213.634806] print_deadlock_bug+0x278/0x3c0
[ 213.635265] __lock_acquire+0x15f4/0x2c40
[ 213.635712] lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2d0
[ 213.636120] ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.636722] ? mlx5_ib_enable_lb+0x24/0xa0 [mlx5_ib]
[ 213.637277] __mutex_lock+0x81/0xda0
[ 213.637697] ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.638305] ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.638902] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70
[ 213.639400] ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.640016] mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.640615] set_ucontext_resp+0x68/0x2b0 [mlx5_ib]
[ 213.641144] ? debug_mutex_init+0x33/0x40
[ 213.641586] mlx5_ib_alloc_ucontext+0x18e/0x7b0 [mlx5_ib]
[ 213.642145] ib_init_ucontext+0xa0/0xf0 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.642679] ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_GET_CONTEXT+0x95/0xc0
[ib_uverbs]
[ 213.643426] ? _copy_from_user+0x46/0x80
[ 213.643878] ib_uverbs_cmd_verbs+0xa6b/0xc80 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.644426] ? ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_INVOKE_WRITE+0x130/0x130
[ib_uverbs]
[ 213.645213] ? __lock_acquire+0xa99/0x2c40
[ 213.645675] ? lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2d0
[ 213.646101] ? ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xc4/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.646625] ? reacquire_held_locks+0xcf/0x1f0
[ 213.647102] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x45d/0x770
[ 213.647586] ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xe0/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.648102] ? ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xc4/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.648632] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x4d3/0xaa0
[ 213.649060] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x4a8/0x770
[ 213.649528] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140
[ 213.649947] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
[ 213.650478] RIP: 0033:0x7fa179b0737b
[ 213.650893] Code: ff ff ff 85 c0 79 9b 49 c7 c4 ff ff ff ff 5b 5d 4c
89 e0 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8
10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d
7d 2a 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ 213.652619] RSP: 002b:00007ffd2e6d46e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000010
[ 213.653390] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd2e6d47f8 RCX:
00007fa179b0737b
[ 213.654084] RDX: 00007ffd2e6d47e0 RSI: 00000000c0181b01 RDI:
0000000000000003
[ 213.654767] RBP: 00007ffd2e6d47c0 R08: 00007fa1799be010 R09:
0000000000000002
[ 213.655453] R10: 00007ffd2e6d4960 R11: 0000000000000246 R12:
00007ffd2e6d487c
[ 213.656170] R13: 0000000000000027 R14: 0000000000000001 R15:
00007ffd2e6d4f70
Fixes: d98995b ("net/mlx5: Reimplement write combining test")
Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
jwrdegoede
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2025
Since commit 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") there is the following ABBA deadlock (simplified) between the LED trigger code and the power-supply code: 1) When registering a power-supply class device, power_supply_register() calls led_trigger_register() from power_supply_create_triggers() in a scoped_guard(rwsem_read, &psy->extensions_sem) context. led_trigger_register() then in turn takes a LED subsystem lock. So here we have the following locking order: * Read-lock extensions_sem * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) 2) When registering a LED class device, with its default trigger set to a power-supply LED trigger (which has already been registered) The LED class code calls power_supply_led_trigger_activate() when setting up the default trigger. power_supply_led_trigger_activate() calls power_supply_get_property() to determine the initial value of to assign to the LED and that read-locks extensions_sem. So now we have the following locking order: * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) * Read-lock extensions_sem Fixing this is easy, there is no need to hold the extensions_sem when calling power_supply_create_triggers() since all triggers are always created rather then checking for the presence of certain attributes as power_supply_add_hwmon_sysfs() does. Move power_supply_create_triggers() out of the guard block to fix this. Here is the lockdep report fixed by this change: [ 31.249343] ====================================================== [ 31.249378] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 31.249413] 6.13.0-rc6+ linux-sunxi#251 Tainted: G C E [ 31.249440] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 31.249471] (udev-worker)/553 is trying to acquire lock: [ 31.249501] ffff892adbcaf660 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.249574] but task is already holding lock: [ 31.249603] ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249657] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 31.249696] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 31.249735] -> #2 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 31.249778] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.249803] led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249833] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.249863] input_leds_connect+0x1dc/0x2a0 [ 31.249889] input_attach_handler.isra.0+0x75/0x90 [ 31.249921] input_register_device.cold+0xa1/0x150 [ 31.249955] hidinput_connect+0x8a2/0xb80 [ 31.249982] hid_connect+0x582/0x5c0 [ 31.250007] hid_hw_start+0x3f/0x60 [ 31.250030] hid_device_probe+0x122/0x1f0 [ 31.250053] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250080] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250105] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250132] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250160] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250184] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250207] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250230] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250252] hid_add_device+0xe5/0x240 [ 31.250279] usbhid_probe+0x4dc/0x620 [ 31.250303] usb_probe_interface+0xe4/0x2a0 [ 31.250329] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250353] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250377] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250404] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250431] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250455] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250478] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250501] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250523] usb_set_configuration+0x606/0x8a0 [ 31.250552] usb_generic_driver_probe+0x3e/0x60 [ 31.250579] usb_probe_device+0x3d/0x120 [ 31.250605] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250629] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250653] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250680] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250707] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250731] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250753] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250776] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250798] usb_new_device.cold+0x141/0x38f [ 31.250828] hub_event+0x1166/0x1980 [ 31.250854] process_one_work+0x20f/0x580 [ 31.250879] worker_thread+0x1d1/0x3b0 [ 31.250904] kthread+0xee/0x120 [ 31.250926] ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 [ 31.250954] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 31.250982] -> #1 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}: [ 31.251022] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.251045] led_trigger_register+0x40/0x1b0 [ 31.251074] power_supply_register_led_trigger+0x88/0x150 [ 31.251107] power_supply_create_triggers+0x55/0xe0 [ 31.251135] __power_supply_register.part.0+0x34e/0x4a0 [ 31.251164] devm_power_supply_register+0x70/0xc0 [ 31.251190] bq27xxx_battery_setup+0x1a1/0x6d0 [bq27xxx_battery] [ 31.251235] bq27xxx_battery_i2c_probe+0xe5/0x17f [bq27xxx_battery_i2c] [ 31.251272] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.251299] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.251324] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.251348] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.251375] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.251398] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.251421] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.251445] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.251470] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.251498] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.251522] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.251550] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.251575] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.251598] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.251629] -> #0 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}: [ 31.251668] __lock_acquire+0x13ce/0x21c0 [ 31.251694] lock_acquire+0xcf/0x2e0 [ 31.251719] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 31.251741] power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.251774] power_supply_update_leds+0x8d/0x230 [ 31.251804] power_supply_led_trigger_activate+0x18/0x20 [ 31.251837] led_trigger_set+0x1fc/0x300 [ 31.251863] led_trigger_set_default+0x90/0xe0 [ 31.251892] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.251921] devm_led_classdev_multicolor_register_ext+0x6e/0xb80 [led_class_multicolor] [ 31.251969] ktd202x_probe+0x464/0x5c0 [leds_ktd202x] [ 31.252002] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.252027] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.252052] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.252076] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.252103] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.252125] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.252148] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.252172] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.252197] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.252225] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.252248] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.252274] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.253986] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.255826] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.257614] other info that might help us debug this: [ 31.257619] Chain exists of: &psy->extensions_sem --> triggers_list_lock --> &led_cdev->trigger_lock [ 31.257630] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 31.257632] CPU0 CPU1 [ 31.257633] ---- ---- [ 31.257634] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257637] lock(triggers_list_lock); [ 31.257640] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257643] rlock(&psy->extensions_sem); [ 31.257646] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 31.289433] 4 locks held by (udev-worker)/553: [ 31.289443] #0: ffff892ad9658108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __driver_attach+0xaf/0x1c0 [ 31.289463] #1: ffff892adbc0bbc8 (&led_cdev->led_access){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_classdev_register_ext+0x1c7/0x3a0 [ 31.289476] #2: ffffffffad0e30b0 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x2c/0xe0 [ 31.289487] #3: ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 Fixes: 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Cc: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2025
When COWing a relocation tree path, at relocation.c:replace_path(), we can trigger a lockdep splat while we are in the btrfs_search_slot() call against the relocation root. This happens in that callchain at ctree.c:read_block_for_search() when we happen to find a child extent buffer already loaded through the fs tree with a lockdep class set to the fs tree. So when we attempt to lock that extent buffer through a relocation tree we have to reset the lockdep class to the class for a relocation tree, since a relocation tree has extent buffers that used to belong to a fs tree and may currently be already loaded (we swap extent buffers between the two trees at the end of replace_path()). However we are missing calls to btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() to reset the lockdep class at ctree.c:read_block_for_search() before we read lock an extent buffer, just like we did for btrfs_search_slot() in commit b40130b ("btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers"). So add the missing btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() calls before the attempts to read lock an extent buffer at ctree.c:read_block_for_search(). The lockdep splat was reported by syzbot and it looks like this: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz.0.0/5335 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880545dbc38 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: reacquire_held_locks+0x3eb/0x690 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5374 __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5563 [inline] lock_release+0x396/0xa30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5870 up_write+0x79/0x590 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1629 btrfs_force_cow_block+0x14b3/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:660 btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755 btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #1 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_write_nested+0xa2/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1693 btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 btrfs_init_new_buffer fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5052 [inline] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x41c/0x1440 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5132 btrfs_force_cow_block+0x526/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:573 btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755 btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x1a0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4351 btrfs_insert_empty_item fs/btrfs/ctree.h:688 [inline] btrfs_insert_inode_ref+0x2bb/0xf80 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:330 btrfs_rename_exchange fs/btrfs/inode.c:7990 [inline] btrfs_rename2+0xcb7/0x2b90 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8374 vfs_rename+0xbdb/0xf00 fs/namei.c:5067 do_renameat2+0xd94/0x13f0 fs/namei.c:5224 __do_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5258 [inline] __se_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5255 [inline] __x64_sys_renameat2+0xce/0xe0 fs/namei.c:5255 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline] validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904 __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649 btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline] read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610 btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-tree-01 --> btrfs-tree-01/1 --> btrfs-treloc-02/1 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1); lock(btrfs-tree-01/1); lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1); rlock(btrfs-tree-01); *** DEADLOCK *** 8 locks held by syz.0.0/5335: #0: ffff88801e3ae420 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x5e/0x200 fs/namespace.c:559 #1: ffff888052c760d0 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_balance+0x4c2/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4183 #2: ffff888052c74850 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x775/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4086 #3: ffff88801e3ae610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: merge_reloc_root+0xf11/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1659 #4: ffff888052c76470 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288 #5: ffff888052c76498 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288 #6: ffff8880545db878 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 linux-sunxi#7: ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5335 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline] validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904 __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649 btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline] read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610 btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f1ac6985d29 Code: ff ff c3 (...) RSP: 002b:00007f1ac63fe038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f1ac6b76160 RCX: 00007f1ac6985d29 RDX: 0000000020000180 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: 00007f1ac6a01b08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f1ac6b76160 R15: 00007fffda145a88 </TASK> Reported-by: syzbot+63913e558c084f7f8fdc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/677b3014.050a0220.3b53b0.0064.GAE@google.com/ Fixes: 9978599 ("btrfs: reduce lock contention when eb cache miss for btree search") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
jwrdegoede
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2025
Since commit 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") there is the following ABBA deadlock (simplified) between the LED trigger code and the power-supply code: 1) When registering a power-supply class device, power_supply_register() calls led_trigger_register() from power_supply_create_triggers() in a scoped_guard(rwsem_read, &psy->extensions_sem) context. led_trigger_register() then in turn takes a LED subsystem lock. So here we have the following locking order: * Read-lock extensions_sem * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) 2) When registering a LED class device, with its default trigger set to a power-supply LED trigger (which has already been registered) The LED class code calls power_supply_led_trigger_activate() when setting up the default trigger. power_supply_led_trigger_activate() calls power_supply_get_property() to determine the initial value of to assign to the LED and that read-locks extensions_sem. So now we have the following locking order: * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) * Read-lock extensions_sem Fixing this is easy, there is no need to hold the extensions_sem when calling power_supply_create_triggers() since all triggers are always created rather then checking for the presence of certain attributes as power_supply_add_hwmon_sysfs() does. Move power_supply_create_triggers() out of the guard block to fix this. Here is the lockdep report fixed by this change: [ 31.249343] ====================================================== [ 31.249378] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 31.249413] 6.13.0-rc6+ linux-sunxi#251 Tainted: G C E [ 31.249440] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 31.249471] (udev-worker)/553 is trying to acquire lock: [ 31.249501] ffff892adbcaf660 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.249574] but task is already holding lock: [ 31.249603] ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249657] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 31.249696] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 31.249735] -> #2 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 31.249778] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.249803] led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249833] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.249863] input_leds_connect+0x1dc/0x2a0 [ 31.249889] input_attach_handler.isra.0+0x75/0x90 [ 31.249921] input_register_device.cold+0xa1/0x150 [ 31.249955] hidinput_connect+0x8a2/0xb80 [ 31.249982] hid_connect+0x582/0x5c0 [ 31.250007] hid_hw_start+0x3f/0x60 [ 31.250030] hid_device_probe+0x122/0x1f0 [ 31.250053] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250080] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250105] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250132] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250160] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250184] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250207] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250230] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250252] hid_add_device+0xe5/0x240 [ 31.250279] usbhid_probe+0x4dc/0x620 [ 31.250303] usb_probe_interface+0xe4/0x2a0 [ 31.250329] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250353] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250377] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250404] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250431] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250455] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250478] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250501] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250523] usb_set_configuration+0x606/0x8a0 [ 31.250552] usb_generic_driver_probe+0x3e/0x60 [ 31.250579] usb_probe_device+0x3d/0x120 [ 31.250605] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250629] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250653] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250680] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250707] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250731] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250753] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250776] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250798] usb_new_device.cold+0x141/0x38f [ 31.250828] hub_event+0x1166/0x1980 [ 31.250854] process_one_work+0x20f/0x580 [ 31.250879] worker_thread+0x1d1/0x3b0 [ 31.250904] kthread+0xee/0x120 [ 31.250926] ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 [ 31.250954] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 31.250982] -> #1 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}: [ 31.251022] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.251045] led_trigger_register+0x40/0x1b0 [ 31.251074] power_supply_register_led_trigger+0x88/0x150 [ 31.251107] power_supply_create_triggers+0x55/0xe0 [ 31.251135] __power_supply_register.part.0+0x34e/0x4a0 [ 31.251164] devm_power_supply_register+0x70/0xc0 [ 31.251190] bq27xxx_battery_setup+0x1a1/0x6d0 [bq27xxx_battery] [ 31.251235] bq27xxx_battery_i2c_probe+0xe5/0x17f [bq27xxx_battery_i2c] [ 31.251272] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.251299] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.251324] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.251348] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.251375] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.251398] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.251421] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.251445] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.251470] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.251498] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.251522] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.251550] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.251575] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.251598] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.251629] -> #0 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}: [ 31.251668] __lock_acquire+0x13ce/0x21c0 [ 31.251694] lock_acquire+0xcf/0x2e0 [ 31.251719] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 31.251741] power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.251774] power_supply_update_leds+0x8d/0x230 [ 31.251804] power_supply_led_trigger_activate+0x18/0x20 [ 31.251837] led_trigger_set+0x1fc/0x300 [ 31.251863] led_trigger_set_default+0x90/0xe0 [ 31.251892] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.251921] devm_led_classdev_multicolor_register_ext+0x6e/0xb80 [led_class_multicolor] [ 31.251969] ktd202x_probe+0x464/0x5c0 [leds_ktd202x] [ 31.252002] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.252027] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.252052] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.252076] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.252103] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.252125] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.252148] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.252172] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.252197] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.252225] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.252248] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.252274] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.253986] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.255826] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.257614] other info that might help us debug this: [ 31.257619] Chain exists of: &psy->extensions_sem --> triggers_list_lock --> &led_cdev->trigger_lock [ 31.257630] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 31.257632] CPU0 CPU1 [ 31.257633] ---- ---- [ 31.257634] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257637] lock(triggers_list_lock); [ 31.257640] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257643] rlock(&psy->extensions_sem); [ 31.257646] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 31.289433] 4 locks held by (udev-worker)/553: [ 31.289443] #0: ffff892ad9658108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __driver_attach+0xaf/0x1c0 [ 31.289463] #1: ffff892adbc0bbc8 (&led_cdev->led_access){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_classdev_register_ext+0x1c7/0x3a0 [ 31.289476] #2: ffffffffad0e30b0 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x2c/0xe0 [ 31.289487] #3: ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 Fixes: 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Cc: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
jwrdegoede
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2025
Since commit 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") there is the following ABBA deadlock (simplified) between the LED trigger code and the power-supply code: 1) When registering a power-supply class device, power_supply_register() calls led_trigger_register() from power_supply_create_triggers() in a scoped_guard(rwsem_read, &psy->extensions_sem) context. led_trigger_register() then in turn takes a LED subsystem lock. So here we have the following locking order: * Read-lock extensions_sem * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) 2) When registering a LED class device, with its default trigger set to a power-supply LED trigger (which has already been registered) The LED class code calls power_supply_led_trigger_activate() when setting up the default trigger. power_supply_led_trigger_activate() calls power_supply_get_property() to determine the initial value of to assign to the LED and that read-locks extensions_sem. So now we have the following locking order: * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) * Read-lock extensions_sem Fixing this is easy, there is no need to hold the extensions_sem when calling power_supply_create_triggers() since all triggers are always created rather then checking for the presence of certain attributes as power_supply_add_hwmon_sysfs() does. Move power_supply_create_triggers() out of the guard block to fix this. Here is the lockdep report fixed by this change: [ 31.249343] ====================================================== [ 31.249378] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 31.249413] 6.13.0-rc6+ linux-sunxi#251 Tainted: G C E [ 31.249440] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 31.249471] (udev-worker)/553 is trying to acquire lock: [ 31.249501] ffff892adbcaf660 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.249574] but task is already holding lock: [ 31.249603] ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249657] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 31.249696] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 31.249735] -> #2 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 31.249778] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.249803] led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249833] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.249863] input_leds_connect+0x1dc/0x2a0 [ 31.249889] input_attach_handler.isra.0+0x75/0x90 [ 31.249921] input_register_device.cold+0xa1/0x150 [ 31.249955] hidinput_connect+0x8a2/0xb80 [ 31.249982] hid_connect+0x582/0x5c0 [ 31.250007] hid_hw_start+0x3f/0x60 [ 31.250030] hid_device_probe+0x122/0x1f0 [ 31.250053] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250080] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250105] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250132] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250160] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250184] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250207] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250230] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250252] hid_add_device+0xe5/0x240 [ 31.250279] usbhid_probe+0x4dc/0x620 [ 31.250303] usb_probe_interface+0xe4/0x2a0 [ 31.250329] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250353] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250377] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250404] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250431] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250455] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250478] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250501] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250523] usb_set_configuration+0x606/0x8a0 [ 31.250552] usb_generic_driver_probe+0x3e/0x60 [ 31.250579] usb_probe_device+0x3d/0x120 [ 31.250605] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250629] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250653] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250680] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250707] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250731] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250753] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250776] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250798] usb_new_device.cold+0x141/0x38f [ 31.250828] hub_event+0x1166/0x1980 [ 31.250854] process_one_work+0x20f/0x580 [ 31.250879] worker_thread+0x1d1/0x3b0 [ 31.250904] kthread+0xee/0x120 [ 31.250926] ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 [ 31.250954] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 31.250982] -> #1 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}: [ 31.251022] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.251045] led_trigger_register+0x40/0x1b0 [ 31.251074] power_supply_register_led_trigger+0x88/0x150 [ 31.251107] power_supply_create_triggers+0x55/0xe0 [ 31.251135] __power_supply_register.part.0+0x34e/0x4a0 [ 31.251164] devm_power_supply_register+0x70/0xc0 [ 31.251190] bq27xxx_battery_setup+0x1a1/0x6d0 [bq27xxx_battery] [ 31.251235] bq27xxx_battery_i2c_probe+0xe5/0x17f [bq27xxx_battery_i2c] [ 31.251272] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.251299] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.251324] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.251348] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.251375] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.251398] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.251421] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.251445] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.251470] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.251498] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.251522] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.251550] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.251575] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.251598] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.251629] -> #0 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}: [ 31.251668] __lock_acquire+0x13ce/0x21c0 [ 31.251694] lock_acquire+0xcf/0x2e0 [ 31.251719] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 31.251741] power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.251774] power_supply_update_leds+0x8d/0x230 [ 31.251804] power_supply_led_trigger_activate+0x18/0x20 [ 31.251837] led_trigger_set+0x1fc/0x300 [ 31.251863] led_trigger_set_default+0x90/0xe0 [ 31.251892] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.251921] devm_led_classdev_multicolor_register_ext+0x6e/0xb80 [led_class_multicolor] [ 31.251969] ktd202x_probe+0x464/0x5c0 [leds_ktd202x] [ 31.252002] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.252027] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.252052] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.252076] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.252103] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.252125] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.252148] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.252172] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.252197] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.252225] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.252248] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.252274] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.253986] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.255826] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.257614] other info that might help us debug this: [ 31.257619] Chain exists of: &psy->extensions_sem --> triggers_list_lock --> &led_cdev->trigger_lock [ 31.257630] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 31.257632] CPU0 CPU1 [ 31.257633] ---- ---- [ 31.257634] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257637] lock(triggers_list_lock); [ 31.257640] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257643] rlock(&psy->extensions_sem); [ 31.257646] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 31.289433] 4 locks held by (udev-worker)/553: [ 31.289443] #0: ffff892ad9658108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __driver_attach+0xaf/0x1c0 [ 31.289463] #1: ffff892adbc0bbc8 (&led_cdev->led_access){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_classdev_register_ext+0x1c7/0x3a0 [ 31.289476] #2: ffffffffad0e30b0 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x2c/0xe0 [ 31.289487] #3: ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 Fixes: 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Cc: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
jwrdegoede
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2025
Since commit 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") there is the following ABBA deadlock (simplified) between the LED trigger code and the power-supply code: 1) When registering a power-supply class device, power_supply_register() calls led_trigger_register() from power_supply_create_triggers() in a scoped_guard(rwsem_read, &psy->extensions_sem) context. led_trigger_register() then in turn takes a LED subsystem lock. So here we have the following locking order: * Read-lock extensions_sem * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) 2) When registering a LED class device, with its default trigger set to a power-supply LED trigger (which has already been registered) The LED class code calls power_supply_led_trigger_activate() when setting up the default trigger. power_supply_led_trigger_activate() calls power_supply_get_property() to determine the initial value of to assign to the LED and that read-locks extensions_sem. So now we have the following locking order: * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) * Read-lock extensions_sem Fixing this is easy, there is no need to hold the extensions_sem when calling power_supply_create_triggers() since all triggers are always created rather then checking for the presence of certain attributes as power_supply_add_hwmon_sysfs() does. Move power_supply_create_triggers() out of the guard block to fix this. Here is the lockdep report fixed by this change: [ 31.249343] ====================================================== [ 31.249378] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 31.249413] 6.13.0-rc6+ linux-sunxi#251 Tainted: G C E [ 31.249440] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 31.249471] (udev-worker)/553 is trying to acquire lock: [ 31.249501] ffff892adbcaf660 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.249574] but task is already holding lock: [ 31.249603] ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249657] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 31.249696] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 31.249735] -> #2 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 31.249778] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.249803] led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249833] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.249863] input_leds_connect+0x1dc/0x2a0 [ 31.249889] input_attach_handler.isra.0+0x75/0x90 [ 31.249921] input_register_device.cold+0xa1/0x150 [ 31.249955] hidinput_connect+0x8a2/0xb80 [ 31.249982] hid_connect+0x582/0x5c0 [ 31.250007] hid_hw_start+0x3f/0x60 [ 31.250030] hid_device_probe+0x122/0x1f0 [ 31.250053] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250080] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250105] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250132] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250160] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250184] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250207] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250230] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250252] hid_add_device+0xe5/0x240 [ 31.250279] usbhid_probe+0x4dc/0x620 [ 31.250303] usb_probe_interface+0xe4/0x2a0 [ 31.250329] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250353] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250377] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250404] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250431] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250455] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250478] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250501] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250523] usb_set_configuration+0x606/0x8a0 [ 31.250552] usb_generic_driver_probe+0x3e/0x60 [ 31.250579] usb_probe_device+0x3d/0x120 [ 31.250605] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250629] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250653] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250680] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250707] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250731] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250753] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250776] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250798] usb_new_device.cold+0x141/0x38f [ 31.250828] hub_event+0x1166/0x1980 [ 31.250854] process_one_work+0x20f/0x580 [ 31.250879] worker_thread+0x1d1/0x3b0 [ 31.250904] kthread+0xee/0x120 [ 31.250926] ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 [ 31.250954] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 31.250982] -> #1 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}: [ 31.251022] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.251045] led_trigger_register+0x40/0x1b0 [ 31.251074] power_supply_register_led_trigger+0x88/0x150 [ 31.251107] power_supply_create_triggers+0x55/0xe0 [ 31.251135] __power_supply_register.part.0+0x34e/0x4a0 [ 31.251164] devm_power_supply_register+0x70/0xc0 [ 31.251190] bq27xxx_battery_setup+0x1a1/0x6d0 [bq27xxx_battery] [ 31.251235] bq27xxx_battery_i2c_probe+0xe5/0x17f [bq27xxx_battery_i2c] [ 31.251272] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.251299] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.251324] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.251348] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.251375] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.251398] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.251421] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.251445] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.251470] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.251498] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.251522] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.251550] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.251575] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.251598] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.251629] -> #0 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}: [ 31.251668] __lock_acquire+0x13ce/0x21c0 [ 31.251694] lock_acquire+0xcf/0x2e0 [ 31.251719] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 31.251741] power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.251774] power_supply_update_leds+0x8d/0x230 [ 31.251804] power_supply_led_trigger_activate+0x18/0x20 [ 31.251837] led_trigger_set+0x1fc/0x300 [ 31.251863] led_trigger_set_default+0x90/0xe0 [ 31.251892] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.251921] devm_led_classdev_multicolor_register_ext+0x6e/0xb80 [led_class_multicolor] [ 31.251969] ktd202x_probe+0x464/0x5c0 [leds_ktd202x] [ 31.252002] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.252027] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.252052] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.252076] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.252103] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.252125] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.252148] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.252172] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.252197] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.252225] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.252248] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.252274] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.253986] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.255826] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.257614] other info that might help us debug this: [ 31.257619] Chain exists of: &psy->extensions_sem --> triggers_list_lock --> &led_cdev->trigger_lock [ 31.257630] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 31.257632] CPU0 CPU1 [ 31.257633] ---- ---- [ 31.257634] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257637] lock(triggers_list_lock); [ 31.257640] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257643] rlock(&psy->extensions_sem); [ 31.257646] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 31.289433] 4 locks held by (udev-worker)/553: [ 31.289443] #0: ffff892ad9658108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __driver_attach+0xaf/0x1c0 [ 31.289463] #1: ffff892adbc0bbc8 (&led_cdev->led_access){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_classdev_register_ext+0x1c7/0x3a0 [ 31.289476] #2: ffffffffad0e30b0 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x2c/0xe0 [ 31.289487] #3: ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 Fixes: 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Cc: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
jwrdegoede
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2025
Since commit 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") there is the following ABBA deadlock (simplified) between the LED trigger code and the power-supply code: 1) When registering a power-supply class device, power_supply_register() calls led_trigger_register() from power_supply_create_triggers() in a scoped_guard(rwsem_read, &psy->extensions_sem) context. led_trigger_register() then in turn takes a LED subsystem lock. So here we have the following locking order: * Read-lock extensions_sem * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) 2) When registering a LED class device, with its default trigger set to a power-supply LED trigger (which has already been registered) The LED class code calls power_supply_led_trigger_activate() when setting up the default trigger. power_supply_led_trigger_activate() calls power_supply_get_property() to determine the initial value of to assign to the LED and that read-locks extensions_sem. So now we have the following locking order: * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) * Read-lock extensions_sem Fixing this is easy, there is no need to hold the extensions_sem when calling power_supply_create_triggers() since all triggers are always created rather then checking for the presence of certain attributes as power_supply_add_hwmon_sysfs() does. Move power_supply_create_triggers() out of the guard block to fix this. Here is the lockdep report fixed by this change: [ 31.249343] ====================================================== [ 31.249378] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 31.249413] 6.13.0-rc6+ linux-sunxi#251 Tainted: G C E [ 31.249440] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 31.249471] (udev-worker)/553 is trying to acquire lock: [ 31.249501] ffff892adbcaf660 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.249574] but task is already holding lock: [ 31.249603] ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249657] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 31.249696] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 31.249735] -> #2 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 31.249778] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.249803] led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249833] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.249863] input_leds_connect+0x1dc/0x2a0 [ 31.249889] input_attach_handler.isra.0+0x75/0x90 [ 31.249921] input_register_device.cold+0xa1/0x150 [ 31.249955] hidinput_connect+0x8a2/0xb80 [ 31.249982] hid_connect+0x582/0x5c0 [ 31.250007] hid_hw_start+0x3f/0x60 [ 31.250030] hid_device_probe+0x122/0x1f0 [ 31.250053] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250080] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250105] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250132] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250160] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250184] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250207] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250230] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250252] hid_add_device+0xe5/0x240 [ 31.250279] usbhid_probe+0x4dc/0x620 [ 31.250303] usb_probe_interface+0xe4/0x2a0 [ 31.250329] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250353] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250377] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250404] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250431] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250455] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250478] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250501] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250523] usb_set_configuration+0x606/0x8a0 [ 31.250552] usb_generic_driver_probe+0x3e/0x60 [ 31.250579] usb_probe_device+0x3d/0x120 [ 31.250605] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250629] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250653] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250680] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250707] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250731] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250753] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250776] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250798] usb_new_device.cold+0x141/0x38f [ 31.250828] hub_event+0x1166/0x1980 [ 31.250854] process_one_work+0x20f/0x580 [ 31.250879] worker_thread+0x1d1/0x3b0 [ 31.250904] kthread+0xee/0x120 [ 31.250926] ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 [ 31.250954] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 31.250982] -> #1 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}: [ 31.251022] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.251045] led_trigger_register+0x40/0x1b0 [ 31.251074] power_supply_register_led_trigger+0x88/0x150 [ 31.251107] power_supply_create_triggers+0x55/0xe0 [ 31.251135] __power_supply_register.part.0+0x34e/0x4a0 [ 31.251164] devm_power_supply_register+0x70/0xc0 [ 31.251190] bq27xxx_battery_setup+0x1a1/0x6d0 [bq27xxx_battery] [ 31.251235] bq27xxx_battery_i2c_probe+0xe5/0x17f [bq27xxx_battery_i2c] [ 31.251272] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.251299] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.251324] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.251348] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.251375] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.251398] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.251421] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.251445] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.251470] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.251498] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.251522] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.251550] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.251575] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.251598] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.251629] -> #0 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}: [ 31.251668] __lock_acquire+0x13ce/0x21c0 [ 31.251694] lock_acquire+0xcf/0x2e0 [ 31.251719] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 31.251741] power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.251774] power_supply_update_leds+0x8d/0x230 [ 31.251804] power_supply_led_trigger_activate+0x18/0x20 [ 31.251837] led_trigger_set+0x1fc/0x300 [ 31.251863] led_trigger_set_default+0x90/0xe0 [ 31.251892] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.251921] devm_led_classdev_multicolor_register_ext+0x6e/0xb80 [led_class_multicolor] [ 31.251969] ktd202x_probe+0x464/0x5c0 [leds_ktd202x] [ 31.252002] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.252027] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.252052] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.252076] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.252103] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.252125] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.252148] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.252172] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.252197] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.252225] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.252248] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.252274] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.253986] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.255826] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.257614] other info that might help us debug this: [ 31.257619] Chain exists of: &psy->extensions_sem --> triggers_list_lock --> &led_cdev->trigger_lock [ 31.257630] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 31.257632] CPU0 CPU1 [ 31.257633] ---- ---- [ 31.257634] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257637] lock(triggers_list_lock); [ 31.257640] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257643] rlock(&psy->extensions_sem); [ 31.257646] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 31.289433] 4 locks held by (udev-worker)/553: [ 31.289443] #0: ffff892ad9658108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __driver_attach+0xaf/0x1c0 [ 31.289463] #1: ffff892adbc0bbc8 (&led_cdev->led_access){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_classdev_register_ext+0x1c7/0x3a0 [ 31.289476] #2: ffffffffad0e30b0 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x2c/0xe0 [ 31.289487] #3: ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 Fixes: 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Cc: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
jwrdegoede
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2025
We have several places across the kernel where we want to access another
task's syscall arguments, such as ptrace(2), seccomp(2), etc., by making
a call to syscall_get_arguments().
This works for register arguments right away by accessing the task's
`regs' member of `struct pt_regs', however for stack arguments seen with
32-bit/o32 kernels things are more complicated. Technically they ought
to be obtained from the user stack with calls to an access_remote_vm(),
but we have an easier way available already.
So as to be able to access syscall stack arguments as regular function
arguments following the MIPS calling convention we copy them over from
the user stack to the kernel stack in arch/mips/kernel/scall32-o32.S, in
handle_sys(), to the current stack frame's outgoing argument space at
the top of the stack, which is where the handler called expects to see
its incoming arguments. This area is also pointed at by the `pt_regs'
pointer obtained by task_pt_regs().
Make the o32 stack argument space a proper member of `struct pt_regs'
then, by renaming the existing member from `pad0' to `args' and using
generated offsets to access the space. No functional change though.
With the change in place the o32 kernel stack frame layout at the entry
to a syscall handler invoked by handle_sys() is therefore as follows:
$sp + 68 -> | ... | <- pt_regs.regs[9]
+---------------------+
$sp + 64 -> | $t0 | <- pt_regs.regs[8]
+---------------------+
$sp + 60 -> | $a3/argument #4 | <- pt_regs.regs[7]
+---------------------+
$sp + 56 -> | $a2/argument #3 | <- pt_regs.regs[6]
+---------------------+
$sp + 52 -> | $a1/argument #2 | <- pt_regs.regs[5]
+---------------------+
$sp + 48 -> | $a0/argument #1 | <- pt_regs.regs[4]
+---------------------+
$sp + 44 -> | $v1 | <- pt_regs.regs[3]
+---------------------+
$sp + 40 -> | $v0 | <- pt_regs.regs[2]
+---------------------+
$sp + 36 -> | $at | <- pt_regs.regs[1]
+---------------------+
$sp + 32 -> | $zero | <- pt_regs.regs[0]
+---------------------+
$sp + 28 -> | stack argument linux-sunxi#8 | <- pt_regs.args[7]
+---------------------+
$sp + 24 -> | stack argument linux-sunxi#7 | <- pt_regs.args[6]
+---------------------+
$sp + 20 -> | stack argument #6 | <- pt_regs.args[5]
+---------------------+
$sp + 16 -> | stack argument #5 | <- pt_regs.args[4]
+---------------------+
$sp + 12 -> | psABI space for $a3 | <- pt_regs.args[3]
+---------------------+
$sp + 8 -> | psABI space for $a2 | <- pt_regs.args[2]
+---------------------+
$sp + 4 -> | psABI space for $a1 | <- pt_regs.args[1]
+---------------------+
$sp + 0 -> | psABI space for $a0 | <- pt_regs.args[0]
+---------------------+
holding user data received and with the first 4 frame slots reserved by
the psABI for the compiler to spill the incoming arguments from $a0-$a3
registers (which it sometimes does according to its needs) and the next
4 frame slots designated by the psABI for any stack function arguments
that follow. This data is also available for other tasks to peek/poke
at as reqired and where permitted.
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
jwrdegoede
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2025
Since commit 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") there is the following ABBA deadlock (simplified) between the LED trigger code and the power-supply code: 1) When registering a power-supply class device, power_supply_register() calls led_trigger_register() from power_supply_create_triggers() in a scoped_guard(rwsem_read, &psy->extensions_sem) context. led_trigger_register() then in turn takes a LED subsystem lock. So here we have the following locking order: * Read-lock extensions_sem * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) 2) When registering a LED class device, with its default trigger set to a power-supply LED trigger (which has already been registered) The LED class code calls power_supply_led_trigger_activate() when setting up the default trigger. power_supply_led_trigger_activate() calls power_supply_get_property() to determine the initial value of to assign to the LED and that read-locks extensions_sem. So now we have the following locking order: * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) * Read-lock extensions_sem Fixing this is easy, there is no need to hold the extensions_sem when calling power_supply_create_triggers() since all triggers are always created rather then checking for the presence of certain attributes as power_supply_add_hwmon_sysfs() does. Move power_supply_create_triggers() out of the guard block to fix this. Here is the lockdep report fixed by this change: [ 31.249343] ====================================================== [ 31.249378] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 31.249413] 6.13.0-rc6+ linux-sunxi#251 Tainted: G C E [ 31.249440] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 31.249471] (udev-worker)/553 is trying to acquire lock: [ 31.249501] ffff892adbcaf660 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.249574] but task is already holding lock: [ 31.249603] ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249657] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 31.249696] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 31.249735] -> #2 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 31.249778] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.249803] led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249833] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.249863] input_leds_connect+0x1dc/0x2a0 [ 31.249889] input_attach_handler.isra.0+0x75/0x90 [ 31.249921] input_register_device.cold+0xa1/0x150 [ 31.249955] hidinput_connect+0x8a2/0xb80 [ 31.249982] hid_connect+0x582/0x5c0 [ 31.250007] hid_hw_start+0x3f/0x60 [ 31.250030] hid_device_probe+0x122/0x1f0 [ 31.250053] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250080] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250105] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250132] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250160] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250184] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250207] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250230] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250252] hid_add_device+0xe5/0x240 [ 31.250279] usbhid_probe+0x4dc/0x620 [ 31.250303] usb_probe_interface+0xe4/0x2a0 [ 31.250329] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250353] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250377] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250404] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250431] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250455] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250478] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250501] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250523] usb_set_configuration+0x606/0x8a0 [ 31.250552] usb_generic_driver_probe+0x3e/0x60 [ 31.250579] usb_probe_device+0x3d/0x120 [ 31.250605] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250629] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250653] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250680] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250707] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250731] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250753] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250776] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250798] usb_new_device.cold+0x141/0x38f [ 31.250828] hub_event+0x1166/0x1980 [ 31.250854] process_one_work+0x20f/0x580 [ 31.250879] worker_thread+0x1d1/0x3b0 [ 31.250904] kthread+0xee/0x120 [ 31.250926] ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 [ 31.250954] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 31.250982] -> #1 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}: [ 31.251022] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.251045] led_trigger_register+0x40/0x1b0 [ 31.251074] power_supply_register_led_trigger+0x88/0x150 [ 31.251107] power_supply_create_triggers+0x55/0xe0 [ 31.251135] __power_supply_register.part.0+0x34e/0x4a0 [ 31.251164] devm_power_supply_register+0x70/0xc0 [ 31.251190] bq27xxx_battery_setup+0x1a1/0x6d0 [bq27xxx_battery] [ 31.251235] bq27xxx_battery_i2c_probe+0xe5/0x17f [bq27xxx_battery_i2c] [ 31.251272] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.251299] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.251324] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.251348] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.251375] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.251398] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.251421] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.251445] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.251470] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.251498] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.251522] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.251550] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.251575] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.251598] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.251629] -> #0 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}: [ 31.251668] __lock_acquire+0x13ce/0x21c0 [ 31.251694] lock_acquire+0xcf/0x2e0 [ 31.251719] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 31.251741] power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.251774] power_supply_update_leds+0x8d/0x230 [ 31.251804] power_supply_led_trigger_activate+0x18/0x20 [ 31.251837] led_trigger_set+0x1fc/0x300 [ 31.251863] led_trigger_set_default+0x90/0xe0 [ 31.251892] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.251921] devm_led_classdev_multicolor_register_ext+0x6e/0xb80 [led_class_multicolor] [ 31.251969] ktd202x_probe+0x464/0x5c0 [leds_ktd202x] [ 31.252002] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.252027] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.252052] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.252076] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.252103] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.252125] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.252148] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.252172] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.252197] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.252225] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.252248] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.252274] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.253986] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.255826] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.257614] other info that might help us debug this: [ 31.257619] Chain exists of: &psy->extensions_sem --> triggers_list_lock --> &led_cdev->trigger_lock [ 31.257630] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 31.257632] CPU0 CPU1 [ 31.257633] ---- ---- [ 31.257634] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257637] lock(triggers_list_lock); [ 31.257640] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257643] rlock(&psy->extensions_sem); [ 31.257646] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 31.289433] 4 locks held by (udev-worker)/553: [ 31.289443] #0: ffff892ad9658108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __driver_attach+0xaf/0x1c0 [ 31.289463] #1: ffff892adbc0bbc8 (&led_cdev->led_access){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_classdev_register_ext+0x1c7/0x3a0 [ 31.289476] #2: ffffffffad0e30b0 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x2c/0xe0 [ 31.289487] #3: ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 Fixes: 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Cc: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
jwrdegoede
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2025
Since commit 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") there is the following ABBA deadlock (simplified) between the LED trigger code and the power-supply code: 1) When registering a power-supply class device, power_supply_register() calls led_trigger_register() from power_supply_create_triggers() in a scoped_guard(rwsem_read, &psy->extensions_sem) context. led_trigger_register() then in turn takes a LED subsystem lock. So here we have the following locking order: * Read-lock extensions_sem * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) 2) When registering a LED class device, with its default trigger set to a power-supply LED trigger (which has already been registered) The LED class code calls power_supply_led_trigger_activate() when setting up the default trigger. power_supply_led_trigger_activate() calls power_supply_get_property() to determine the initial value of to assign to the LED and that read-locks extensions_sem. So now we have the following locking order: * Lock LED subsystem lock(s) * Read-lock extensions_sem Fixing this is easy, there is no need to hold the extensions_sem when calling power_supply_create_triggers() since all triggers are always created rather then checking for the presence of certain attributes as power_supply_add_hwmon_sysfs() does. Move power_supply_create_triggers() out of the guard block to fix this. Here is the lockdep report fixed by this change: [ 31.249343] ====================================================== [ 31.249378] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 31.249413] 6.13.0-rc6+ linux-sunxi#251 Tainted: G C E [ 31.249440] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 31.249471] (udev-worker)/553 is trying to acquire lock: [ 31.249501] ffff892adbcaf660 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.249574] but task is already holding lock: [ 31.249603] ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249657] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 31.249696] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 31.249735] -> #2 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 31.249778] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.249803] led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 [ 31.249833] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.249863] input_leds_connect+0x1dc/0x2a0 [ 31.249889] input_attach_handler.isra.0+0x75/0x90 [ 31.249921] input_register_device.cold+0xa1/0x150 [ 31.249955] hidinput_connect+0x8a2/0xb80 [ 31.249982] hid_connect+0x582/0x5c0 [ 31.250007] hid_hw_start+0x3f/0x60 [ 31.250030] hid_device_probe+0x122/0x1f0 [ 31.250053] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250080] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250105] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250132] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250160] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250184] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250207] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250230] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250252] hid_add_device+0xe5/0x240 [ 31.250279] usbhid_probe+0x4dc/0x620 [ 31.250303] usb_probe_interface+0xe4/0x2a0 [ 31.250329] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250353] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250377] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250404] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250431] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250455] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250478] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250501] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250523] usb_set_configuration+0x606/0x8a0 [ 31.250552] usb_generic_driver_probe+0x3e/0x60 [ 31.250579] usb_probe_device+0x3d/0x120 [ 31.250605] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.250629] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.250653] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.250680] __device_attach_driver+0x85/0x110 [ 31.250707] bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xc0 [ 31.250731] __device_attach+0xb0/0x1b0 [ 31.250753] bus_probe_device+0x94/0xb0 [ 31.250776] device_add+0x64a/0x860 [ 31.250798] usb_new_device.cold+0x141/0x38f [ 31.250828] hub_event+0x1166/0x1980 [ 31.250854] process_one_work+0x20f/0x580 [ 31.250879] worker_thread+0x1d1/0x3b0 [ 31.250904] kthread+0xee/0x120 [ 31.250926] ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 [ 31.250954] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 31.250982] -> #1 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}: [ 31.251022] down_write+0x3b/0xd0 [ 31.251045] led_trigger_register+0x40/0x1b0 [ 31.251074] power_supply_register_led_trigger+0x88/0x150 [ 31.251107] power_supply_create_triggers+0x55/0xe0 [ 31.251135] __power_supply_register.part.0+0x34e/0x4a0 [ 31.251164] devm_power_supply_register+0x70/0xc0 [ 31.251190] bq27xxx_battery_setup+0x1a1/0x6d0 [bq27xxx_battery] [ 31.251235] bq27xxx_battery_i2c_probe+0xe5/0x17f [bq27xxx_battery_i2c] [ 31.251272] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.251299] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.251324] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.251348] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.251375] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.251398] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.251421] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.251445] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.251470] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.251498] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.251522] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.251550] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.251575] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.251598] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.251629] -> #0 (&psy->extensions_sem){.+.+}-{4:4}: [ 31.251668] __lock_acquire+0x13ce/0x21c0 [ 31.251694] lock_acquire+0xcf/0x2e0 [ 31.251719] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 31.251741] power_supply_get_property.part.0+0x22/0x150 [ 31.251774] power_supply_update_leds+0x8d/0x230 [ 31.251804] power_supply_led_trigger_activate+0x18/0x20 [ 31.251837] led_trigger_set+0x1fc/0x300 [ 31.251863] led_trigger_set_default+0x90/0xe0 [ 31.251892] led_classdev_register_ext+0x311/0x3a0 [ 31.251921] devm_led_classdev_multicolor_register_ext+0x6e/0xb80 [led_class_multicolor] [ 31.251969] ktd202x_probe+0x464/0x5c0 [leds_ktd202x] [ 31.252002] i2c_device_probe+0x125/0x2b0 [ 31.252027] really_probe+0xde/0x340 [ 31.252052] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110 [ 31.252076] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0xa0 [ 31.252103] __driver_attach+0xba/0x1c0 [ 31.252125] bus_for_each_dev+0x6b/0xb0 [ 31.252148] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x1f0 [ 31.252172] driver_register+0x6e/0xc0 [ 31.252197] i2c_register_driver+0x41/0xb0 [ 31.252225] do_one_initcall+0x5e/0x3a0 [ 31.252248] do_init_module+0x60/0x220 [ 31.252274] __do_sys_init_module+0x15f/0x190 [ 31.253986] do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 [ 31.255826] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 31.257614] other info that might help us debug this: [ 31.257619] Chain exists of: &psy->extensions_sem --> triggers_list_lock --> &led_cdev->trigger_lock [ 31.257630] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 31.257632] CPU0 CPU1 [ 31.257633] ---- ---- [ 31.257634] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257637] lock(triggers_list_lock); [ 31.257640] lock(&led_cdev->trigger_lock); [ 31.257643] rlock(&psy->extensions_sem); [ 31.257646] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 31.289433] 4 locks held by (udev-worker)/553: [ 31.289443] #0: ffff892ad9658108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __driver_attach+0xaf/0x1c0 [ 31.289463] #1: ffff892adbc0bbc8 (&led_cdev->led_access){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_classdev_register_ext+0x1c7/0x3a0 [ 31.289476] #2: ffffffffad0e30b0 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x2c/0xe0 [ 31.289487] #3: ffff892adbc0bad0 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: led_trigger_set_default+0x34/0xe0 Fixes: 6037802 ("power: supply: core: implement extension API") Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Cc: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
in A20_User_Manual_v1.4_20150510, 1.19.2.
Port Configuration Table, a column is missing, maybe that
is why there is a bad value here. it is "6" in
PI_CFG1 descrition for EINT funcs though
tested on bananapi, pi17 is on ExtCon-15, pi18 on ExtCon-13...
Signed-off-by: Frederic Germain frederic.germain@gmail.com