Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust the exclusivity of the restore and archive job #174

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2020

Conversation

Kidswiss
Copy link
Contributor

@Kidswiss Kidswiss commented Dec 3, 2020

Restores aren't exclusive in upstream Restic:
https://github.com/restic/restic/blob/master/cmd/restic/cmd_restore.go#L105

The exclusivity of the various job types should match what's defined in
the upstream Restic project.

Resolves: #173

@Kidswiss Kidswiss requested a review from ccremer December 3, 2020 07:43
Restores aren't exclusive in upstream Restic:
https://github.com/restic/restic/blob/master/cmd/restic/cmd_restore.go#L
105

The exclusivity of the various job types should match what's defined in
the upstream Restic project.
@Kidswiss Kidswiss merged commit fc8f39d into master Dec 3, 2020
@Kidswiss Kidswiss deleted the fix/exclusive_locks branch December 3, 2020 09:40
@ccremer ccremer added the change Generic change that is neither a fix or feature label Dec 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
change Generic change that is neither a fix or feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Operator treats restores and archives as exclusive
2 participants