-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 919
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add helm variables to choose controllers of karmada and kubernetes ma… #2542
Closed
fredgate
wants to merge
1
commit into
karmada-io:master
from
fredgate:feature/helm-value-controllers
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I prefer to use
controllers
directly.config
looks a bit redundant.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can use
controllers
directly instead ofconfig.controllers
, but I preferred the latter because it will be more organized if some additional parameters need to be added such ascluster-status-update-frequency
orv
...All these values will be clearly under
controllerManager.config
rather than directly at the root ofcontrollerManager
, which I find more readable.What do you think about it ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I got what you mean. I prefer to put some related configuration items under the same group. It's ok to use
controllers
directly when there are currently no other options.BTW, I don't think
config
is a good group name. All of them incontrollerManager
belong to the category of config.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that we may need to customize other parameters later, they are organized together would be great!
How about
args
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes
args
seems like a better name to me.Should we use it as
The latter makes it possible to better cover all the possibilities without modification.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the former is better. The latter may confuse users about which configuration items can be configured.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The latter option allows to configure all args of
karmada-controller-manager
, that allows the user to configure anything he wants, not just what we imagine : there can always be unimagined scenarios, like for example mine. And both current and future. And the chart will be compatible without change not only with current arguments but also with future ones.@RainbowMango What do you think about this two solutions ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The idea is great, but my concern is the user experience. The users might need to specify all args at here, even they just want to customize the
--controllers
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Kindly ping @fredgate .