-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump to Go 1.23 #512
Bump to Go 1.23 #512
Conversation
d6a8308
to
c0996b6
Compare
Warning Rate limit exceeded@evenh has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 28 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces an upgrade to the Go programming language version across multiple GitHub Actions workflow files and the Dockerfile. The Go version has been updated from Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (6)
- .github/workflows/build-and-deploy.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/deploy-sandbox-dispatch.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/release-version.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
- Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- go.mod (8 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- .github/workflows/build-and-deploy.yaml
- .github/workflows/release-version.yaml
- .github/workflows/test.yml
- go.mod
Additional comments not posted (2)
Dockerfile (1)
1-1
: Approved: Dockerfile updated to Go 1.23.The change to update the Go version in the Dockerfile is approved. Ensure to verify the build process and application behavior with the new Go version to catch any potential compatibility issues early.
Run the following script to verify the build process:
.github/workflows/deploy-sandbox-dispatch.yaml (1)
33-33
: Approved: Updated Go version in GitHub Actions workflow.The update to Go 1.23.1 in the GitHub Actions workflow is approved. Ensure to verify the workflow execution to catch any potential compatibility issues with the new Go version.
Run the following script to verify the workflow execution:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
config/rbac/role.yaml (1)
7-38
: Approve the addition of new permissions but recommend a security review.The new permissions added to the
ClusterRole
skiperator
significantly expand its capabilities, allowing it to manage a wider range of Kubernetes resources. While these changes are approved, it is recommended to conduct a thorough security review to ensure that the permissions are necessary and do not expose the system to potential security risks.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- config/crd/skiperator.kartverket.no_applications.yaml (1 hunks)
- config/crd/skiperator.kartverket.no_routings.yaml (1 hunks)
- config/crd/skiperator.kartverket.no_skipjobs.yaml (1 hunks)
- config/rbac/role.yaml (2 hunks)
- tests/application/access-policy/multiple-ns-same-label-assert.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/application/cloudsql-auth-proxy/application-no-cloudsql-patch.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/application/cloudsql-auth-proxy/application.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- config/crd/skiperator.kartverket.no_applications.yaml
- config/crd/skiperator.kartverket.no_routings.yaml
- config/crd/skiperator.kartverket.no_skipjobs.yaml
- tests/application/access-policy/multiple-ns-same-label-assert.yaml
Additional comments not posted (2)
tests/application/cloudsql-auth-proxy/application-no-cloudsql-patch.yaml (1)
Line range hint
1-10
: Verify the default behavior of Cloud SQL Proxy after removing theenabled
property.The removal of the
enabled
property from thecloudSqlProxy
configuration simplifies the setup but could alter how the application connects to Google Cloud SQL. It's crucial to verify whether this change disables the proxy by default or if other settings within the application or environment override this behavior.tests/application/cloudsql-auth-proxy/application.yaml (1)
Line range hint
1-10
: Verify the default behavior of Cloud SQL Proxy after removing theenabled
property.The removal of the
enabled
property from thecloudSqlProxy
configuration could potentially disable the proxy by default or alter its enabling mechanism. It is essential to verify the new default behavior to ensure that the application's connectivity to the Cloud SQL instance is not adversely affected.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/application/access-policy/chainsaw-test.yaml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
tests/application/access-policy/chainsaw-test.yaml (1)
7-7
: Confirm the change to sequential execution.The modification from
concurrent: true
toconcurrent: false
changes the execution behavior of the access policy to be sequential. This change can significantly impact performance and resource utilization, especially in environments where parallel processing is critical.Please ensure that this change aligns with the intended behavior and verify its impact on the system. Consider running performance benchmarks or simulations to assess the effects of disabling concurrent processing.
Pending kyverno/chainsaw#1869
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
Improvements
skiperator
role, allowing for more comprehensive management of Kubernetes resources.